Bleach Wiki talk:Image Gallery

Profile Picture Changes
As per the Image Policy, nominate and discuss changes to the profile pictures of the character articles here and only here. The typical requirements for a profile picture are that it shows the character facing forward, in their typical attire and should not be battle-worn. They should be centered, have good lighting, and be of good quality. Candidates also must have valid and complete and  templates attached to them or else they will be rejected.

Suggestion for '5 y/o ghost boy' new profile pic
WD  Talk to me  16:32, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

Amagai
I'm going to finish overhauling Amagai's article soon, but before I do, I think we need to change his profile image, as the lighting in it is off. I found 2 shots that I liked, but if anyone else wants to put up any other options, that's cool, but I think we should change it to something with Amagai in the daylight, facing the camera (before using his Bankai). Arrancar109 (Talk)  16:54, June 27, 2010 (UTC)

I like 187 as it is a little closer and I like the expression but 168 is good as well--God (Pray)  17:18, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

Tosen
I don't like Tosen much but I do think he deserves a better profile picture then he current has. How about Option A from episode 280? Tinni  (Talk)  14:13, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

lol. im usually quite biased of my own pics, but that one is really good too. hmm id go with either one, honestly.--RexGodwin 16:23, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

Option B is not suitable imo (too heavily shadowed). A is alright, but I'd prefer to see if we get any better ones before he pulls out his Hollow mask. 20:51, July 20, 2010 (UTC)

I'm with Yyp on this. Let's wait for at least another episode or so (depending on how long it takes for Tosen to get his mask) before voting. I mean, out of these two, I'd say A is the way to go, since B is heavily shadowed, but I want to wait until after the next episode(s) come out, so we can possibly get better options in the future before picking something. Arrancar109 (Talk)  04:30, July 22, 2010 (UTC)

Byakuya
I'm proposing for a better pic of him because hes not exactly facing forward so could people suggest some pictures and the admins could decideKaran8 (talk) 23:28, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

The current one is fine. Besides, none of these would work any better than the current one. He's visibly battle-worn in some of them, and all of them are not in daylight lighting. Arrancar109 (Talk)  00:22, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

I agree that none of these will work. First, not a single one of them has valid or  templates, plus they are all too dark, some are not facing the camera, have background distractions, battledamage. 11:16, August 7, 2010 (UTC)

I dislike these pictures as well!! They're dull and not the best images they can show!! SunXia (talk) 01:31, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

ive added an option 6 if the admins want to delete the rest they can and how do you change the name of the pictureKaran8 (talk) 02:06, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Still doesn't have him facing the camera. The current image is fine. Arrancar109 (Talk)  05:38, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Agreed, it is not an improvement on the current, imo, which should be left up. 16:04, August 8, 2010 (UTC)

Aizen
Possible replacement for Aizen's profile pic. I didn't place it but thats what it was listed for in a incorrect area. --Salubri (Talk)  04:45, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

I vote no, something is... off about it. I just don't like it--God (Pray)  03:53, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

I think it could work because it shows off the mysterious feeling that Aizen gives off. The current one just shows off his face while this one shows a bit more of his body. --Hammer Bro. Mike (talk) 04:07, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

The eyes are off, blurry and horrible. I don't see a problem with the current picture, seriously. Some characters need change (Tosen, for example) and some characters don't. Aizen's picture is from FKT, even if it's from last year (if I recall correctly), it depicts Aizen's usual expression perfectly and the drawing is just perfect (and I'm always complaining about the drawing, so that's quite something). Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  04:56, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

I agree. It is certainly not better than the current one. And I don't think Aizen's pic needs to be changed. 17:43, August 28, 2010 (UTC)

Image request
I think the image on the right already can replace the manga version. Apekiller96 (talk) 07:14, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Which image are you wanting to replace this with? GinIchimaru (talk) 08:05, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Maybe what he/she means is to put this on his page or to replece the manga pic of when he first dons this mask. Tensa Zabimaru (talk) 09:34, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, I wanted to replace the manga version of when Ichigo dons his new mask. Apekiller96 (talk) 12:50, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

I think the picture might do better in the powers section, to compliment the other mask picture. That way we have a picture of his first (last version) and second mask. Mohrpheus (talk) 13:03, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

I gotta agree with Mohrpheus on this one, the picture you want to replace in the plot section not only shows the new mask but also an action shot of Yammy being hit by a GT so i dont think it would be sufficiently replaced by this new picture alone. So i'd go with Mohrpheus's idea. GinIchimaru (talk) 13:16, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

I went ahead and put it up, since it's the clearest shot of the mask, and it actually has the Fair Use tags on it. If a better shot is made available in the future, then we might replace it, but it'll be awhile before that comes up. Arrancar109 (Talk)  17:22, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

The current manga shot of Ichigo hitting Yammy with GT & new mask does not have a great anime equivalent. There weren't great shots of that fight at all, imo. Any thoughts on a replacement for it? 20:42, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

i wanted to ask if you could use this image instead of the manga one even though it doesnt show ichigoKaran8 (talk) 22:37, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Putting aside the logo etc, it is not a great picture. I think we'd be better off using something else, a different scene. 22:50, September 1, 2010 (UTC)


 * I uploaded a newer version of the photo without the logo and without the white specs that are in Karan8's version but it's not turning-up properly. I don't think the image is half bad in the high definition. It's just that Karan8's version was very low quality that the image looks terrible. Tinni   (Talk)  23:06, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

That's not too bad. I could go with that, though I have no objection to changing it to a different scene if that is what people want. I'll leave that up to you. 23:29, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

I'm for the Yammy Getsuga'ed pic. It looks pretty good to me. <font color="teal" size="2px">Arrancar109 <font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)  05:50, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

It's not exactly a fair fight; the manga image has two panels, and there's not been such a thing in the anime. The important question is what the more important of the two panels is. Do we really need another shot of another black getsuga tensho? Because there already is an example of the technique from the anime in the Powers section. I vote for the shot of the new mask, since it represents a truly new phenomenon that we don't really understand yet, and since it isn't already pictured somewhere else. Lemikam (talk) 06:48, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Can this image helps you? Apekiller96 (talk) 04:33, September 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * Speaking only for myself, I have a supreme dislike of jointed images. Especially vertically jointed images. No body said that we have to recreate the manga image perfectly. We just have to pick the best image from the anime. The Yammy one is good enough. Tinni   (Talk)  08:57, September 4, 2010 (UTC)


 * I really don't like that combined picture. The Yammy Getsuga'ed one is alright (certainly better than the joined image). My second choice would be Rukia & Ichigo. 21:39, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Heh. My term was used. Anyway, I looked into the scene, and it looks possible to pan the entire shot together (Ichigo performing the Getsuga Tensho and Yammy being hit by it), but unfortunately, it would take someone very, very good at panning images together in order to do it. I tried doing it myself, but it was actually a lot harder than I initially thought. If it can be done, then someone do it, but otherwise, my vote remains for the Yammy Getsuga'ed pic. <font color="teal" size="2px">Arrancar109 <font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)  21:42, September 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Nope, panning is near impossible because of the action lines. I did the best I could but...  Tinni   (Talk)  08:55, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Hm. At this rate, we might have to settle for Yammy just getting hit by the Getsuga, but it just doesn't seem right without Ichigo. Perhaps we should just use the one with Ichigo and Rukia; we typically use the anime equivalents, but in this case, it just doesn't seem like it'll work out. Mohrpheus (talk) 13:05, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Cataloguing
Place any images that are to be catalogued in the Image Galleries here.

Episode 149, Anime Summary Project
Logged, 20:15, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Episode 147, Anime Summary Project
Catalogued, 20:15, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Ashido Kanō Images
Logged, 11:24, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Kon Images
Logged 11:34, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Omake Image Gallery
I would like for an Omake Image Gallery setup to go with Omake Segments article. We have a number of images from omakes that have been uploaded for feature picture and/or personal use and I think an Omake Gallery could useful. Tinni  (Talk)  23:14, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Volume Sketch Gallery
I think it's a good idea to have a designated gallery for all the volume sketches. I realize there are few (if any) in actual use, but I believe as the Bleach Wiki we should have all these images in stock. WD  Talk to me  20:33, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Fraccion Image Gallery
I was wondering if there were any plans for an image gallery for the various Fraccion.

I think it would be a good idea as I've seen lots of spare images hanging around the wiki and some are pretty cool.

Also would it be a big image gallery, with all the Fraccion sharing one? Or would they each get individual galleries.

If any admins would like to discuss this, I would be happy to respond quickly. :)TotalDrama22121. When worlds collide...it's dramatic. 22:32, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Each individual Fracción member would have their own image galleries. I don't see what good it'll do to group them all together. It'll be like grouping Ikkaku, Yumichika, and Aramaki's pages together, just because they all serve under Kenpachi Zaraki and Yachiru Kusajishi. I think the only individuals who will have their pages grouped together are Shinigami and their respective Zanpakuto Spirits with them, generic Hollows, generic Toju, and generic Arrancar. I think that would be it. Every other character would have their own image gallery. <font color="teal" size="2px">Arrancar109 <font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)  22:51, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for clearing that up. :) TotalDrama22121. When worlds collide...it's dramatic. 22:56, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Zanpakuto Image Gallery
I think that a Zanpakuto Image Gallery would be useful. It would have their Sword/Sealed forms, Shikai, Bankai (if any), their Spirit forms, and the video clip of their special abilities, all with seperate galleries, but in the same category.

It could shown them with their masters, or seperately, but a Zanpakuto Image Gallery would be really useful.

All zanpakutō are in their respective shinigami's pages. Such as Byakuya's page has pics of his sowrd sealed, shikia, bankai and different bankai forms along with gifs of his abilities and Senbonzakura's spirit.--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  19:14, September 3, 2010 (UTC)

I think there is merit in this request. We could have an image gallery that is the sub-article of the Zanpakutō article. I think it would be nice to be able to see all the different zanpakutos in the one gallery. Tinni  (Talk)  19:38, September 3, 2010 (UTC)