Bleach Wiki:Featured Article

'''Please, do not vote for a character ONLY because he/she is recently featured or you like him/her. Instead, vote for an article that is of good quality (i.e. it is informative, referenced properly, up to date, etc).''' (Note : Please, wait for four months before re-adding an already featured article to the list, thanks). Feel free to add characters we forgot to add, but consider that they MUST have been recently featured in the anime or manga.

The deadline is September 29, 2010. Any unsigned vote will be REMOVED before vote counting.

Votes
How to vote:


 * Vote by typing either of the following in the relevant sections:

Only one "Support" vote per user.

The "Oppose" option is to be used only to highlight issues with a candidate.

See the Voting Policy for more rules and guidelines on voting.


 * Apparently How to vote isn't clear. Everyone is asked to check the Voting Policy before engaging in votes. It is obvious some will engage in voting only to vote for the favorite character. That is not a Valid vote. Voting on what information is in the featured articles (i.e. voting because a character has revealed their Bankai or backstory), is not a Valid reason. Votes should be based on the quality of the article (i.e. nicely organized, in-depth information, properly referenced, free of speculation, decent grammar). Voting for an article obviously flawed and claiming it is better than one that doesn't suffer the same issue is not a valid vote, that is voting for more preferred character again.

Sōsuke Aizen

 * 1) We have had so much information coming for Aizen in the past few weeks and it is insane how well it has all been handled. His transformation section is organized with all of his new powers and abilities listed properly and we have managed to keep it free of speculation. Aizen has always had an excellent article and it has only improved over the weeks.--God  (Pray)  15:27, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) I have voted for Aizen for the same reason for the past three months, and I will do so again for the very same reasons. Aizen's article has been constantly updated with new information from this month's chapters, which has all been well organized and properly referenced. His powers and abilities section in particular continues to flourish, and his personality section has expanded to reflect how he has developed. The staff did particularly well with preventing speculation on the article, particularly about his fourth transformation. Aizen may not be Aizen anymore, but his article is certainly one of the best on the wiki, and worthy of being featured this month. Edit:I couldn't add this before, but I can think of no better way to send off the main villain than to feature his article - have fun in limbo, Aizen. Mohrpheus (talk) 15:49, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Byakuya Kuchiki

 * 1) He has a good article. Well referenced, with excellent image-text balance, there is nothing missing from his article, all sections are complete. It's an all round, nice, balanced article.  Tinni   (Talk)  15:50, September 22, 2010 (UTC)
 * 2) yeah I am in agreement here, an awesome article for Byakuya well referenced and lovely pictures!! SunXia (talk) 10:28, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Kaname Tōsen

 * 1)  This is one of the easiest votes to make, since the character is long dead and most of the edits in his page are for new images from the anime. I believe his article to be in great shape: full history and plot sections, detailed P&A section as well as appearances in other media and quotes - all well referenced. This month is probably the last time in canon Bleach where his character is active, so I think it should go to him this month.   WD   Talk to me  15:11, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Deleted Votes
Any vote that is deemed invalid is moved here. Reasons why a vote may not be considered valid are set out in the Voting Policy.


 * 1)  Coincidence the recent events in the manga, it would be a good idea (as Aizen has finally met his end) it would be both a tribute and a way of showing how complete the article is. I agree with both above that the Article is one of the best on the wikia, as we soon see someone of the development (maybe) stop with them unless he is referenced, It is also both free of speculation and is very well maintained Desruprot (talk) 22:27, September 22, 2010 (UTC) User does not meet criteria to vote as set out in the Voting Policy (has not been actively contributing to the Wiki's articles this month)

Articles Already Been Featured
(Bleach Wiki:Featured Article/Archive)