User talk:Reenachii

Grimmjow edit
Hi, I'm Timjer, one of the mods here. I just wanted to explain why Xillinoc undid your Grimmjow edit. See, Grimmjow's flashback with his Fraccion (back as Hollows) confirmed that Grimmjow was in fact an Adjuchas back then. While I agree that Grimmjow was trying to evolve into a Vasto Lorde, the manga never confirmed if he actually succeeded by the time he first appeared. So, calling him an Adjuchas is still the most accurate thing we can do. Timjer (talk) 10:00, 24 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Why would it create confusion? It is outright established that Grimmjow was indeed an Adjuchas in the past. Anything else is either speculation or omitting information. The reason Nnoitra or Yammy for example aren't listed as such is because we have literally NO IDEA at all which they used to be, as opposed to Aaroniero, Harribel, or Grimmjow. Now, I know CFYOW states that Grimmjow was a VL by then, but even IF the novel is 100% canon, who's to say Grimmjow hadn't achieved VL status ONLY then, not earlier? Timjer (talk) 15:26, 24 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Alright since this is still a thing, for us to add something into our articles you must be able to reference it. As in, there must be a page from the Manga that says "Grimmjow is a Vasto Lorde." You cannot provide this.


 * "Grimmjow was never confirmed to be an Adjuchas Arrancar, this is purely a fan assumption."


 * "the rhetoric in Grimmjow’s background chapters imply he would go on to become a Vasto Lorde. We see him first as an adjuchas (just like most of his partner hollows), but the wording of his monologue implied he evolved beyond this. This also makes sense of Kubo’s statements in Data Book 2 that “most” of the Espada are vasto lorde-level."


 * And the Act of Accord guaranteed Richard of York would be King of England next. Spoiler alert, he wasn't. But maybe he was, maybe they removed all mention and/or he wasn't crowned because he certainly acted like he had the throne until, because a King is only as powerful as his Lords allow him to be, they checked him because just weren't ready for the "depose a king" step. So who knows, it was never ever really confirmed what happened in those few days when people bicker behind closed doors. Does not mean we should list him as Richard III and his son Richard IV right? As in, potential and outcome are not always the same thing?