Board Thread:Improvements and Issues/@comment-24415673-20140625125933/@comment-5398287-20140701002513

Azuchi67 wrote: yea i did a quick look through the obvious chapters and it isnt specifically referanced so its buried somewhere amongst the other esoteric information, but this isnt something im simply making up its really easy to realise and figure out if you look at the information and do some figuring xD, ill keep digging though got a good idea where its buried.

as for stefan, nice use of taking only JUST enough to make an arguement and ignoring the rest while at the same time offering nothing whatsoever and simply making it soundlike your a bigman i love when one of you guys comes about, besides its not exactly hard to figure out things about stuff kubo practically hands to us on a plate >.> seriously just do a bit of digging on your own and you'll probably notice things people havent pointed out either Allow me to step in. There was one and only one instance in the flashback arc where White's composition was discussed.

Tousen: I would rather you not refer to him as "the prototype". His name is "White". // He is on an entirely different level from the various Hollows we have created up until now. // After all... // He is the first Hollow we have created from the soul of a Shinigami.

There is no mention of Vasto Lordes, or even other Hollows, being involved in his creation.

Nimaiya also briefly noted White's composition:

Nimaiya: I'm saying this Hollow... // ...is your Zanpakutou, simple as that. // The Hollow that Aizen created - he called it "White" - was formed from the souls of many Shinigami. / And ironically enough... / That's pretty much the same as how my Asauchi are created. // That Hollow went on to enter your soul... / ...where it fused with your own natural Shinigami powers... // ...and became your Zanpakutou.

Again, there is NOTHING about Vasto Lordes or Hollows in general. In fact, it appears White was made entirely of Shinigami souls.

These are the only two times in the entire manga that White's composition has been discussed, and nothing in either of these two instances supports your claim. So I see no reason to believe what you're claiming when I've been able to find concrete evidence against what you've said, which you have still failed to properly back up beyond "no I'm sure it's there believe me guys I'll just keep looking but it's true I promise".