Talk:Tōshirō Hitsugaya

Pictures about Hitsugaya's tecniques


Can I add these pictures about Ryuusenka, and Sennen Hyourou to Hitsugaya's zanpakutou tecniques?

I don't really think those pics show anything, they are just ice. I think for his techniques we really do need gifs to explain what is going on--Godisme (Talk)  16:51, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

I agree. Strange, I could swear that the article had a gif of Hitsugaya stabbing "Aizen" and using Ryuusenka. And I suppose a gif of him using Sennen Hyoro on Luppi would be the best way to show that technique. Mohrpheus 16:55, April 27, 2010 (UTC)

Censorship and More Trivia?
I've noticed that when Hitsugaya's ice clone is slashed in the anime, it doesn't bleed, while in the manga, it does. I think we need the old picture of the clone being slashed back and put it and the anime version together to show the differences. Also as it seems, you don't see petals behind Hitsugaya in the anime anymore. It's sorta speculative, but I think it is worth noting as the petals do appear in the manga once more and it's odd to see that they don't in the anime. Gold3263301 23:18, June 8, 2010 (UTC)

I noticed that there were no petals during their fight in the anime as well. That would go to the trivia section. As for the bleeding clone, I don't think that it would necessarily be put into a censorship section as the anime tends to be a bit less bloody than the manga. A note could be placed in the Ice Clone section that in the anime, the clone doesn't bleed or something. Censorship is more of a drastic change like when Matsumoto loses her midsection in the manga but gets hit for internal damage in the anime.

That's my opinion anyways. --Shinitenshi 03:20, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

It can't really fit into the abilities section, since that part of the article is supposed to be in-universe. But Shinitenshi's right about the trivia section - the ice flower thing is a pretty significant oversight. Mohrpheus 04:12, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Urahara Kisuke, a prodigy?
I was wondering why, under HItsugaya's "Child-Genius" heading, that Urahara Kisuke is mentioned as the only person who is equally as gifted, when no reference to Urahara being a particular prodigy in anything but intelligence is ever noted in the manga. Meanwhile, both Gin and Kaien have been called geniuses, and are the only characters to date to have been called as such. Curious91 (talk) 08:43, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

As far as I know the last prodigy to enter the Gotei 13 before Hitsugaya according to the manga is Gin. Urahara while stated to be the smartest person in bleach may have been a prodigy but such a thing was never confirmed. That should be changed to reflect that.--Salubri (Talk)  08:54, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Bankai
In Hitsugaya's fight with Luppi, he states that as long there is water in the atmosphere, he can replenish his Bankai. Doesn't this contradict those petals?? BlazeUchiha (Talk)  16:44, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Hitsugaya never confirmed that the petals were a time limit for his Bankai - that was just Shawlong speculating. So we can't really say for sure. Even so, both statements can be true - just because he can only be in his Bankai for a limited time (seems unlikely at this point) doesn't mean that he can't regenerate it with water. Mohrpheus (talk) 13:24, September 16, 2010 (UTC)

yeah but he did say in his battle with tia hallibel that he new his bankias weaknesses better than anyone as the facusses is on his deteriorating pedals. Rigoberto60 (talk) 14:29, January 8, 2011 (UTC)

Something I noticed
I'm rather new to Bleach, so I'm still on about Chapter 180. But one thing I noticed is that Hitsugaya has a tendency to sneak up on people and scare the crap out of them (Hinamori and Matsumoto). Is that worth mentioning in the article? Waterdrop95 (talk) 05:59, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

Considering both characters were distracted by being deep in thought, it's really more about his timing at sneaking up on both of them, rather than it being a habit. Arrancar109 (Talk)  06:04, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

Either way its not really a personality trait and its junk trivia so it doesn't really have a place in the article--God (Pray)  06:20, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

Gif
There was a comment earlier on this page from Mohrpheus that maybe Hitsugaya's power section needed some gifs as we can't really have stills for his ability as they are just ice. I thought I would make some. Here is the first one. I figure they might be of use in the image gallery even if we don't use it in the article itself. Tinni  (Talk)  00:29, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

The gif looks pretty good; it captures the scope of the technique a lot better than the time he used it against Luppi. But now that I think about it, asides from the ordinary ice dragon flow from his sword, we don't have many pictures of Hyorinmaru's abilities at all. Do you by any chance have a gif of Hyoten Hyakkaso? Because now that I think about it, the current pic "just shows ice" like previously suggested ones for other techniques did. Mohrpheus  (Talk)  01:52, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

Here is it. I'll probably see about making one or two more when I sit down later tonight to make the half dozen or so gifs I have to from the latest episode. Tinni  (Talk)  09:49, December 7, 2010 (UTC)

Trivia
In Hitsugaya's trivia section, it mentions his rank in the popularity poll. But why does it mention that he beat Rukia by ___ votes. It is unecessary, and to me, it seems whoever wrote that has something personal against Rukia. I say that part should be removed. NightTrain (talk) 22:55, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

While I see your point, things aren't put in the articles in order to mock other characters, in fact, such fanboy-ism is frowned upon here!! The articles deal with simple facts and that piece of information is fact, not an opinion, he won the poll by that amount!! If something like so that mean she sucks or something equally degrading then yes, of course it would be removed, however, the Trivia section deals with interesting facts about the character and that's an intereting fact!! It's no different from stating that Rukia has consistently been the most popular female in the polls, because, as she has finished the highest female characters in the polls everytime, this information is also fact and not put in there to mock a character!! Fact is fact, not slandering another character in anyway!! SunXia (talk) 23:20, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

II am well aware of what is frowned upon here. But what I'm saying is that it shouldn't mention Rukia in particular. NightTrain (talk) 23:37, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

It mentions Rukia in particular because she came in right after him in second place (with Hitsugaya being in first). It has nothing to do with character preference; it has to do with fact. It's just elaborating on how much space there was between them for first place. If it had been Ichigo instead of Rukia, it would have said Hitsugaya beat Ichigo by ___ votes, just as it would have been if it had been any other character. It's a fact, it's interesting, some people might want to know it, so there's no reason it should be removed. .Seshat. (talk) 23:47, March 11, 2011 (UTC)

I have to agree with NightTrain, the rule for trivia is that it has to be directly relevant to the character. This is why trivia like "_______ was the first _______ to _______. ________ was the second to do this" is considered junk. The very fact that another character could be mentioned in Rukia's place demonstrates that mentioning her at all is pointless. No other character poll mention makes this comparison, anyway. Mohrpheus  (Talk)  00:06, March 12, 2011 (UTC)

I actually agree with NightTrain and Mohrph, there is really no point in mentioning who was second or how many difference in votes there was. All that is relevant to Hitsugaya's article is that he was first place and that he got X votes, if anyone wants to know anything else, we have the Popularity Polls article for further information on the topic. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  00:18, March 12, 2011 (UTC)