User talk:10X Kamehameha

Closed Discussions Conclusion
Actually, I'm an excitable person in real life you don't know me so don't call me rude, I address everyone with my exclamation points, don't think yourself so special or try to make it out like I am bullying you with them, though given your record, I should hardly be surprised you tried to pull that one!! Believe what you wish in your own world, you've been advised by two high ranking members of the Bleach Wiki:Policy & Standards Committee who have told you that you were wrong in the first place and that Salubri just deleted everything because it was a pointless discussion!! You were not right, your edit was referencing Gin's article so it did belong there, all you were doing was trying to look better, which nobody cares about, hence why it was wiped in end!! You were wrong, and God was wrong too but he removed your name when you stopped but you continued in a childish, immature fashion, which was squashed right away!! If you want to do something wothwhile, why not do something worthwhile insead of trying to interpret the rules to fit your own ends, otherwise I dn't see the point in this discussion unless your going to attempt to contibute, a waste of time really!! You have not proved you were right so just get over yourself and at least attempt to do something of good merit here!! SunXia  (Chat)  21:35, June 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't call you rude. I didn't say you were bullying me. Pull what? I deleted it because it was pointless too, that was the reason in the first place. I was right, it didn't, it was wiped because of the same reason I thought it should be. I didn't interpret the rules, I followed them to the letter (other than the edit warring). I don't see a point either, which is why I archived it. I only respond because it wouldn't be polite to ignore a post placed specifically on my talk page, the only reason for which would be for me to read it. Your posting is literally the only reason for my responding. 21:41, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

No one's trying to bully you, Kamehameha, but you continue to argue a point that we have been saying the same thing in different ways to try and help you understand us. The Policy and Standards Committee are this wiki's judiciary branch in effect, and Policy is the "law" here. The P & S interperets and enforces those laws. Their word IS Policy, in effect. You can't just run around this wiki shouting about Policy the way you see it. You ARE interpreting the rules. What you said on the talk page was legitimate. It wasn't irrelevant, it was just seemed kind of pointless to some but was nevertheless legit. We're not trying to say you're always wrong and the P & S is always right, but if everyone ran around with their own ideology of how the Policy should be viewed, then we'd have an extremely shabby wiki. So until the higher-ups sit down and discuss about something that might have to be reinterpreted, their word stands. I jumped in because I sympathized; I was a newbie editor just like you, and the first time God got the pounce on me, just like you I got kind of hurt. I understand how that feels, and am trying to tell you that I understand, and I'm trying to help you out. But you're shutting out a lot of the help we're trying to give you. Stop getting so defensive, man. We're only trying to help. Look, let's all calm down a little, maybe wait ten minutes before we talk again. Then maybe we'll actually make some headway. Aeron Solo wuz here (If you wanna talk)  21:49, June 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * I didn't say anyone was bullying me, SunXia just decided to say that he was not for some reason. I'm fine with the protocol being that a few non-admins can interpret the policies in a way other than is written, but if that isn't written in the rules somewhere, than new users will follow the policies as written, as I did, by default. What I said on the talk page was irrelevant, and Salubri said so, which means the admins, who are higher than the committee, think so too. I was just siding with the policy as written and the opinion of the admin, which unfortunately was not the side everyone was on at the time. As for headway, I am 100% content with leaving this matter behind us, but people continuing to bring it up on my talk page makes it impossible. To reiterate, if no one instigates a response from me, I will not respond. The ball is in the court of users other than me. 21:57, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

Ok, you don't have to respond to this one. It's totally fine if people start with their own interpretation, we're willing to correct people. That's what we're all here for. Even if we wrote what the P & S viewed it as, people are going to see that interpretation another way too. That's why the committee exists. Regardless of what everyone here said, we all agree that this issue is childish, so from here on out, let's talk about other things. Agreed? Aeron Solo wuz here (If you wanna talk)  22:04, June 24, 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes that's fine with me. If someone in a committee disagrees with an admin, who should I listen to though? I feel like I'm kind of getting mixed signals, and I know on other sites the admin would be right, but here I think it might be the committee member. I want to know for the future to avoid things like this again. Thanks! : ) 22:08, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

The Admins have the higher word, but typically the admins and Committee work as one group. Don't worry about all this, stuff like this more or less happens from time to time. Basically, if an admins specifically disagrees with what a committee member has said, then most of the time it's no contest. But the admins are more like the presidents here. They have more power, but they have to listen before they make any moves. This is an anomoly here; God and Sun normally doesn't allow such an issue to drag on so long. This is a rare case for them, so you can be sure it probably won't turn out like this again. Aeron Solo wuz here (If you wanna talk)  22:14, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

My original point was that there was no harrassment going on and there wasn't and then you criticised how I wrote and hinted that it was "rude" and that I was yelling at you which I wasn't!! I don't really care for the issue at hand, I thought I'd give you friendly advice but then you decided to ignore and tyr to tell me I don't know my the policies which I do!! Again, Salubri did not agree, he merely wiped the pointless argument, the original actio nwas correct!! If something ignotes over something silly, to keep the peace the Admins will wipe it clear!! I've been here longer and I know the protocol and have seen many similar things happen and does not mean the Policy member was wrong, it just means that it was not something that was wort the potential abuse given your new status!! Salubri never said "Godisme is rong and you were right", you chose to interpret it that way and label Godisme for blocking as a result, which was wrong and pointless!! But anyway, let's move on, as I said, familiarise yourself with the rules before contributing, if you actually intend on doing someting here, there are projects you could help out with!! SunXia  (Chat)  22:18, June 24, 2011 (UTC)

P.S. Sunxia is not giving you an order, she's pointing out in her enthusiastic way that there are a ton of projects here. Fight summaries, grammar corner, Chapter/Episode summaries, arc summaries, the list goes on. Aeron Solo wuz here (If you wanna talk)  22:22, June 24, 2011 (UTC)