Bleach Wiki talk:Image Gallery/Archive13

Sinner Szayelaporro
So with the release of the new story obviously come a lot of new character designs. One of the most notable is Szayelaporro Granz as a sinner/demon/hellbeast/whatever. Thing is, which image to you think is best to be added to his page? The first, larger one with the horns, or the second one in which he actually looks at the camera?


 * 1) For Option 1. Timjer (talk) 20:05, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) For Option 2. I'd go with option 2 because while it might be less detailed, it honestly shows a bit more and I don't think the horns are par of his default state. Ti9MK97s (talk) 20:22, 9 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 3) Option 2 is what I had in mind when I uploaded these - Option 1 is more fit for his appearance section to illustrate a more specific part of his new appearance, and one he can apparently turn on or off. Additionally, 2 is front-facing and 1 is more three-quarters.--Xilinoc (talk) 20:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

The Almighty/Expanded Universe
I'm gonna keep this short, but The Almighty/Expanded Universe originally had the profile pic of the SK as a demonstration (Both because of the eyes and because we have nothing better to show for it). But since it's primarily to show the SK's unusual eyes to demonstrate it (considering Haswalth and Yhwach gain similar eyes when activating The Almighty in canon), I was thinking of replacing it with an almost unused pic instead that focuses on the SK's eyes specifically. Timjer (talk) 12:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)


 * 1) As the proposer. Timjer (talk) 11:55, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) Whoops, only just caught this, my b. Anyway, I agree - the increased focus is better, and the rest of the SK's mannequin head isn't important. Plus, more use for forgotten files is always a win in my book.--Xilinoc (talk) 15:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Akon
So there's a lot of...not-great things about Akon's long-standing profile image. He's largely facing away from the camera, he's in poor lighting, and his mouth is just hanging open like a doofus. Now, the replacement I've found isn't perfect, but it fully or nearly rectifies at least those three issues to show him more properly, and if nothing else it's a decent placeholder till a more proper one can be located.--Xilinoc (talk) 15:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)


 * 1)  As proposer.--Xilinoc (talk) 15:25, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) While I don't feel particularly strong about the change, Xilinoc's reasoning makes sense. Timjer (talk) 15:35, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Hey a lil late to the party, how about this one?Edanakas (talk) 06:46, 2 September 2021 (UTC)


 * 1) Yeah, I like this one better lol. More akin to his usual look.--Xilinoc (talk) 06:50, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
 * 2) as proposer. dont you mean...more akon to his usual look. -shot-Edanakas (talk) 16:31, 3 September 2021 (UTC)