User talk:Godisme

Re: Sensless, mindless violence guy
All right, thanks for telling me. TheDevilHand888 (talk) 19:01, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Text Reduction: Aizen
I just added Aizen's article to the text reduction list. Since you are suppose to be his biggest fan on this wiki, consider yourself volunteered to do it. Have fun reducing the text on Aizen-taicho's page! ^.^ Tinni   (Talk)  20:10, August 10, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, in case you missed it, I talked it over with Lia and we agree that for the text reduction, a better guide might be the chapter. As in, within the profile, it is best not to collapse references to 306-308 etc. But to summarise the fight content of each chapter in as few a line as possible but still have a single reference per chapter the fight was in. This will help readers find the relevant chapter easily when they go to verify or simply reread the chapter and also will ensure that no vital information is lost. So I would say no more then three lines per chapter. Although I think the idea with be more 1-2 reasonable sized lines. I have re-expanded Kenpachi's article a bit, to the new "every chapter has a reference" model. But from here on out, I would like you and Lia to work together to figure out how best to do the text reduction since by now, you two have more experience in the matter then I do. Tinni  (Talk)  05:28, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism
Wasn't attempting to vandalize i wanted to prove to my friend that pretty much anyone can edit wiki information sorry for the inconveinance.

Re:User Neo Bahamut
Thanks for that. I've clarified a couple of points in the user page/discussion/what Bleach Wiki is not policies because of that. The spam/advert thing is a Wikia global policy - part of their terms of use. It wasn't written down locally before, but it is now. Now I can get back to my update to the community portal. 18:55, August 11, 2010 (UTC)

No Problem
Episode 155 it is, sure what parts would you like since it is your summary, i get worried incase others dont like my images but i try to include as many characters as possible, how many images wud u like in general and what of?? Will do my best SunXia (talk) 02:13, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

I'll get right on it, fats as possible, just remember, their fight's in a dark area so I'll do my best!! SunXia (talk) 02:44, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, Well here's some, above, I'll not submit them in the image catalogue until you tell me if they're ok, also there's already a pic of Kaien trapped, so even though I uploaded one, gunna mark it for deletion and just replace it up there with the one on the site!! I put up too pics of Aaroniero Arruruerie because I didn't know if you wanted a facial picture or bust picture!! Have a look!! SunXia (talk) 03:39, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Oops, the Nejibana thing needs to be changed, here, that one was already uploaded too, sorry, just change it to the one I have changed it to up there SunXia (talk) 03:52, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Text Reduction
Well, it does seem it's on us now. For the three I've done (Kenpachi, Ulquiorra and Ikkaku) I tend to take out what seems like senseless battle description and if there's some chatter that goes with it, I go to the chapter and check if it's really important and try to rephrase it to take out the battle and leave the text (if it's impossible then I murder the speech), I really try not to take out dialogue unless I feel like "This really is not important" or there's no other way around. It really is much easier when you're reading both the chapter and the article at the same time. I didn't do it with Ulquiorra because I can't bear reading those chapters and it was really hard to know what to cut (also, there wasn't much to cut there, I still have issues with the Fight vs Character article in that case, but I'm not going there). Anyway, I'm going to cut Starrk's article next. As for guidelines and stuff, I don't know, I just read it and keep whatever I think is relevant to understand what happened and the what the character tried to show of his powers, personlity and ideals during the fight (say Kenpachi always laughs when he fights because he enjoys it, but it shows his personality, so I didn't want to cut those even if it seemed a bit irrelevant), I also go to the chapters and try to keep the descriptions to those panels that the manga highlights, like I told Tinni, (like this one or this one  -just taking the ones I showed Tinni, lol), and keep the references untouched because they're sacred (sorta). That's all I can think of. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  02:24, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

OK, I'll give it a read when I have time, it does seem like you cut a ton judging by the byte-count but I won't know until I read it. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  00:35, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Anime Summary
Yeah, you should go from the title screen on. This goes for all other information in the episode as well. TheDevilHand888 (talk) 03:36, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Kaien's name should be added in there as well, along with a parenthesis added next to his name saying "Aaroniero's forecasting", since that's how the manga chapters in Volume 30 currently have it as. TheDevilHand888 (talk) 05:21, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Bleach Terms
Heh, thanks. It's been over a year since I joined this wiki, yet my User page has been almost empty all this time. So, I decided to try something a little new for a change. I'll probably add on to the list later on; maybe it will end up amusing more people one day. XD Mohrpheus (talk) 18:09, August 12, 2010 (UTC)

Good Question, please respond.
Well, you know how Aizen loves Hollows and Arrancar (I wouldn't say love,) but he gave them tea.....Now how do they drink it? They don't have hearts, and their hollow whole would just make the tea drip out of them (or spill out.) Since Aizen had the Hogyoku, then he shouldn've removed their Hollow wholes. Goooooooood question isn't it! Please respond -Morgan silve (talk) 21:48, August 12, 2010 (UTC)Morgan Silve

Cool


Got'cha their didn't I! It was also cool cause you responded when I landed on Aizens page, lol!--Morgan silve (talk) 21:56, August 12, 2010 (UTC)Morgan Silve

List of Shinigami Page
Hello, I noticed that on the list of Shinigami page that Isshin is listed as a former captain, with the division unknown. Has he been confirmed as a former captain? Northstar1012 (talk) 00:47, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Don't change things unilaterally. Isshin was declared a captain because he has a captain's haori. Tinni  (Talk)  01:01, August 13, 2010 (UTC)

Who would be stronger?
Between Aizen (without the hogyoku in him) and Kaname, who would be stronger?

Yah neva no
Kaname already had hollowfaction which already augments all of his strengths, has a ressureccion, too. Also, Aizen's Kyoka Suigetsu won't stand a chance against Kaname, because Aizen needs to see in the dark. He can't hear, smell, or see when he's fighting tousen either. Now, Aizen with the hogyoku will cut Kaname like a paper. He'll call his arts and crafts "How I see Kaname Better" -Kaname's head halfway decapitated, half of his body seperate from eachother, both arms cut off, and to be nice, he left one leg for him =P- please respond,

PS- Kaname is second to Aizen with the Hogyoku though, I don't know much about Gin though.Morgan silve (talk) 01:40, August 13, 2010 (UTC)Morgan Silve

Shinji's Zanpakuto, you can see, Kaname's you can't. You can even sense reiatsu. But I'm saying before the hogyoku was implanted into him. Morgan silve (talk) 01:50, August 13, 2010 (UTC)Morgan Silve

Yes/No. Yes- Aizen will surley kill him before he releases bankai. But theres always shikai. Kaname can use his shikai to knock aizen out. I have to make research on that though, but to me they're of equal strength.Morgan silve (talk) 01:57, August 13, 2010 (UTC)Morgan Silve

Please respond.

Momo and Aizen
If Aizen stayed in the Soul Society, would you think Momo and him would get married?Morgan silve (talk) 14:50, August 14, 2010 (UTC)Morgan Silve

Uh, being a fan of Momo's. For starters with the current events she would have to be insane to do such a thing. Even if they were still there, there is obviously a very large age gap between the two of them (seeing as she was practically a "teenager" when she first meet him and he was much older, easily middle aged). So it would be quite controversial. And lastly, I think she, even in Shinigami terms is a little to young to be getting married anyways. And lastly, with Aizen's plans, he would never do such a thing, knowing what he was planning to do in the first place. So in all honesty, never. Ltjuno (talk) 06:55, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Chad
I saw your edit. And actually, yes, you can call him "Chad" on the articles; it's just that most pages refer to him as "Sado". Arrancar109 (Talk)  16:45, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

It's cool. It's only a problem with characters with last names to refer to them by their last names if they happen to share their last names with other characters (Uryu as "Ishida", Rukia as "Kuchiki", Isane as "Kotetsu, etc.) since their last names traditionally link up to a disambiguation page that inform readers which characters contain that last name. Also, before it comes up, I'm not sure what's going to happen with Kotsubaki and Iba as they are. It's probably something that we'll work out after the rest of the info regarding MASKED is done. Arrancar109 (Talk)  16:57, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Well, like I said, it's probably something we'll work out after everything else on MASKED is done. I've always referred to them by their first names (you can thank the dub for that, lol). My guess is that once the Arrancar renamings and other MASKED issues are settled, we can discuss the potential issues with shared names (Omaeda, Yamada, Iba, Kotsubaki, Kenpachi). Arrancar109 (Talk)  17:17, August 14, 2010 (UTC)

Checkout my newest wikipedia
You can check out my newest wikipedia through this wedsite. Http://www.doradies.wikia.com enjoy! here are some characters Dora the explora boots the canibal monkey benny the fat canible bull iguana the ugly lizard!

Hope this gives you a laugh

Please read dora the exploras plot! And if you want, you can be part of the admin team, you can be the vice-captain Morgan silve (talk) 23:46, August 16, 2010 (UTC)Morgan Silve

Related to Kido article
I was thinking like how for the articles flash steps or hoho and Zanjutsu like how they give descriptions on levels example. Master to Expert, etc. Could the Kido pape be like that for because I have been seening characters like Mayuri Kurotsuchi being only an expert while have 100% in their power/abilites bar and yes I know that some of those character are give those description for being a master in those arts should be said in the manga/anime or shown in them just please let me now. Sorry for for the bad grammer bad keyboard.Creator5000 (talk) 08:24, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Buttons
The ō, ū etc are in the edit tools box underneath the edit window & show changes button, ("Characters" heading, bottom left). I've pointed it out to people in the past & added it to the tips widget, but it still is not that well known. When I added it to Bleach Answers, I though about adding it to here too, but I kinda thought that since custom edit buttons are only visible to users that have the rich text editor turned off, it would only benefit a small number of people. I'll add it to here. 15:33, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Ulquiorra Cifer
Since Ulquiorra is dead and no longer a central antagonist then wouldn't it make sense to change it to "was".

Ulquiorra Cifer
Since Ulquiorra is dead and no longer a central antagonist then wouldn't it make sense to change it to "was". Warya123456 (talk) 22:35, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

i know uliquiorra is dead and has been for a while but i edit and for forgive me for mis spelling his enhanced prequisa i added more detail as that is one of his noticeable powers and well i edited to the best info from manga, just plz before yu or the other admins undo it could yu read it as i just made it sound more in detail and i also tried to stay clear from guess work.Creator5000 (talk) 18:28, September 5, 2010 (UTC)

Link
Here you go. Hope you enjoy it! Tinni  (Talk)  03:50, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks! I am glad it made you laugh. I guess it says something about my obsession level with Gin that I can capture him rather well. ^.^ Tinni   (Talk)  12:35, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Tatsuki
Assuming Morgan silve does meet my deadline, could you do a grammar check on Tatsuki's page? A lot of what this user has done in the past needed checking and, in addition to lacking references, had more details than necessary, poor grammar, and incorrect tenses on the articles, so we need to keep an eye on anything this user's edits. Arrancar109 (Talk)  03:08, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Alright cool. Thanks a lot. Arrancar109 (Talk)  03:11, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Vanadlism
Listen my Uncle and his friend run a Manga shop/Gamers shop. I've been there for the release of the third bleach ds game and everyone says he looks like Urahara. I was doing them a big flippin favor and writing it. Oh and another thing, Godisme, that sounds like you are implying you are a god/godess.

opinion
It is just an opinion. Besides if I say I don't like you then you are one of the few people I rarely dislike. What ever happened to the freedom of speech and press in america.

You are striking my last nerve. Good night to all those who read this. I'm calling it a night. Let's pick the mess up tomorrow.

Does the person above genuinely believe that the internet is under United States jurisdiction!? hahahahahaha, wow. GinIchimaru (talk) 06:33, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

What is the Bill of Rights? It doesn't even exist in America, let alone a silly thing called the "Freedom of Speech". Go outside and speak your opinion and see what happens. Ltjuno (talk) 06:46, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

Ch417
Its there on their website and twitter feed. 22:39, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

They were probably fixing the mix-up with the page order they made. 22:51, August 25, 2010 (UTC)

User Pages.
Basically when it comes to user pages if there are people that want to just work on their page doing fan fiction and what not they can transition themselves over to the Bleach Fan Fiction wiki. Its not fair for others who put in alot of work on the site while others take up time and space on the sight. At first its harmless but thats another person not doing any editing with all the stuff we have to do. Then it becomes more of people trying to social network like this is facebook and then its adding onto pages with false information or fan fiction and then theres the issue of the constant uploads of useless pics. So if people dont want to contribute then we can do bad by ourself. So if you come across people who are just putting up pages to work on them rather then the actual articles then let them know this isn't facebook or myspace and that we appreciate them actually helping out and if they need help then point them in the right direction. If they dont wanna do that and it becomes a problem let the admin know of the admin request page, that simple. --Salubri (Talk)  03:39, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

Gin's page
Well I already made a point on his page and then closed it. I think its a point to make it known we aren't caving into fan pressure on this issue. Gin himself if not dead is dying and basically acknowledges that by saying he is leaving. He isn't talking or moving and only thinking at this point the Kubo death formula has been done so by that point his status aint changing unless he is up walking around or in possible recovery. There is no sufficient kido practioner to heal him in the area. No Unohana and no Orihime. Its not are fault these people can't deal.--Salubri (Talk)  22:02, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

The only thing that we have is the site notice that appears at the top of every page, but I just don't see putting anything there stopping these protests. These people are going to say it no matter what, as they go straight to the talk page or whatever upon seeing the status. Some of them don't even check to see if there is already a discussion on the page (Stevo). We just have to put up with it. 22:12, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah. There is a lot of huge Gin fans on other fan sites that are in a rage about his current condition. I can't think of anyways to prevent outburst on Gin's personal talk page without locking it. But if you do that, then people that have actual serious things that need to be changed, then they won't be able to discuss it on there. Best bet is to stay top of his page and as soon as someone brings it up. Close the discussion and tell them to take it to forums or to a blog. Once he is "clearly" shown dead or alive then people should ease up on it. The sooner the better. Ltjuno (talk) 22:24, August 26, 2010 (UTC)

Vandalism against you
Hey man, some idiot has created an account with the name godismeisAVIRGINDORKthatliviesinhisparentsbasement he also posted some rubbish about you on the Is Gin really dead blog. I will inform the admins aswell, just thought you should know about this imbecile GinIchimaru (talk) 00:35, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

I wouldnt think into it too much, i believe most people appreciate the hard work put in by the admins, the policy and standards comittee and as of recently yourself. I dont see why people are getting so heated over the Gins status thing, no matter what anyone believes is is such a trivial matter to argue over his status on a wiki article... theres no need to resort to vandalism. GinIchimaru (talk) 00:53, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Ironically, when people resort to this kind of trash, it usually means that you were doing your job rather well. Keep up the good work. Mohrpheus (talk) 01:09, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Haha, thanks.--God (Pray)  01:11, August 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Gin's status
I tell you what I will drop it if you and your staff members can knock off the stubbornness and actually start listening to us for once. So far this site has been far from “Everyone can edit” to “Moderately edit”. You guys cannot prove that Gin is dead. If he was dead... wouldn't his eyes be shut and unable to think? Dead people cant think. They will be laying there lifelessly. I'm not going to start insulting you guys, since I think that requires low class, but you sure bring some some of it yourselves. You do realize that a lot of people who once had respect for this site is now losing respect? You guys are quick to list people as deceased without waiting for the true facts. If you want us to drop it.... then allow us ALL to edit pages without locking it. That is what Wiki is about.. the right for all to edit... not only for a particular “chosen” people. If you guys want to play this game then why not build an actual website instead of using a wiki page? Not everyone here are idiots.. Theirs probably half of the people here who are not moderators or admins that probably knows Bleach a lot better then you guys. Just be glad that we are speaking up. Be glad that we are donating our time to pinpoint your mistakes. Be GRATEFUL. ByakuyaMayuri (talk) 02:25, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

The decision has already been made by us. And, the administrator. His status will remain unchanged until further notice. Ltjuno (talk) 02:46, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

I tried to look at it, and it said it's an invalid link. Also since what you are asking is a different question then Gin's status you might want to ask in another message next time instead of putting under one that is for a different topic, as not to confuse anyone. =) Ltjuno (talk) 04:04, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

If people who have nothing better to do but make an account to complain about a characters status let them. The point is not allowing fan opinion to dictate what is placed on the sight period. There is nothing ambiguous about Gin's status if its not one thing its another. One change is cause to question any change in status that any person doesn't agree with simply because its their favorite character and they refuse to believe their dead. Status is determined by what took place in the manga. In such an event we go with whats closest to the status we use we dont make up status or put incapacitated for people who are dying and have no future in the series. and only name it unknown if its ambiguous. seeing as no character has the same circumstance as another comparing is not accountable. My suggestion is let them say what they want on the forum short of violating policies. Ill talk to Arrancar109 and Yyp about this situation. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  06:15, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

People make the mistake of viewing you as an admin simply because you act like one. Look at what you wrote on my page for an example. You wrote: “'''Gin's status is deceased. We are keeping it that way.” If you're not in the category of of the admins then you need to use a different word, like for instance “Gin's status is deceased. The admins are keeping it that way until other wise.” You also used “ If Gin is shown to be alive we will change his status same as we did with Rangiku but for now we are going to list him as deceased.” Again you used the word “We'''”. Why don't you let the admins speak out for themselves instead of being their pet? Are you trying to kiss your way to the top? Is that how you become the admins on this wiki? If so then you're doing a pretty good job smooching yourself way up there :) I hope you do win the promotion of being on the committee for being a kisser :)

You also said this: “Insult this wiki all you want but you will not find a wiki of higher quality than this”

I am not insulting this wiki... just questioning the people who have the ability to change the status on the characters so quickly without waiting for the actual proof. I must say that the person/people who changed Rangiku's status to deceased was made out fools by a fictional character... Yes Gin owned them with his sarcasm! It was awesome. It's nice to say "Did I tell ya so" So far we won the battle and you guys lost. Granted Gin probably is going to die but he's not quite yet dead yet. :) ByakuyaMayuri (talk) 03:11, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

I know English quite well thank you very much :) Obviously I'm not under the "We" category including others who volunteered their time questioning the status of Gin and not that long ago Rangiku and wasn't able to edit their page because it was locked... probably still is too. Yeah it's truly unfortunate that that had to come... Took bad that the status part was removed. I thought it was exceptionally important to know the status of each character. Too bad certain people were in a rush to change the status and not wait. Impatience leaded to this whole argument. The damage has been done as some people actually believe it because Bleach wikia said so. ByakuyaMayuri (talk) 04:05, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Benihimes Original Sealed Form
I just wanted to get your opinion on this picture of Kisuke, is this the only picture of Benihime's original sealed form? If you know another please let me know. Thank you. UraharaHitsugaya (talk) 04:00, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Never mind you did. But, still it says the link is invalid. Ltjuno (talk) 04:05, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

To be more specific is says: No Thread specified. If you followed a valid link, please notify the administrator. Ltjuno (talk) 04:06, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re:User Troubles
Unfortunately, no, but I'll keep my eye on him. Yeah, I got the references in his name too, so all we can do is see what he does. I'll be watching him closely. <font color="teal" size="2px">Arrancar109 <font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)  05:37, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Gin's Forum
I was going to do it (I have yet to figure out how to do so, though), but Arrancar109 beat me to it. Though we can expect 10 more of those in the next week unless Gin is showed with his head missing or something super drastic like that (gross) Lia Schiffer   (Talk)  06:12, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

Ichimaru's Status
I closed the discussion. Yeah, it got way out of hand. I'm absolutely amazed on how much of a recurring theme this is. While this one is much more chaotic that Rangiku's was, I still find Rangiku a bit funnier. Thing is, some people demanded good guy blood for almost all of the Espada dying, and when we finally had Rangiku stated as dead, we have users complaining about it. Anyway, given what's been going on here, the only thing that I have been convinced of is not taking down Ichimaru's protection status, since some of these users-in-question will change it the first chance they get. If this thing pops up again and nobody has gotten to it, let me know. <font color="teal" size="2px">Arrancar109 <font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)  06:14, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

So I see. Well I am tired of talking about it so dont send them to me lol. I have more important things to do then talk something so ridiculous to death. If this is gonna be an issue ill remove status from every profile. Problem solved.--<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  06:33, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

So the issue is clear those with issue with character status on this site can all talk themselves to death now about nothing as the status for all character articles have been removed. --<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  07:16, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

If they complain that they want them back its simple to tell them that so fanatical people who aren't users of the sight decided to make this site a forum much like they do on other Bleach discussion sites and start altercations and thus messed it up for everyone. Not to mention the continuous bombardment of some who are actual users on the site. Everyone can have their own opinions but fanboys and girls will not dictate policy or content on this site period.--<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  22:42, August 29, 2010 (UTC)

I am in total agreement here, some of those users are way out of line!! It's like they all have less than 100 edits between them!! I'm sorry God, that guy was so rude!! SunXia (talk) 00:00, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

I know, people just can't get over this, it's getting so annoying. I'm starting to worry because some user mentioned how "other" character statuses were "biased" or whatever, I just hope old cases aren't going to be brought up again after it was so hard to "kill" them. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  03:57, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

No other ambiguous character fate has ever caused this much negative reaction on the wiki, not even the case with Rangiku. So it's easy to assume that most of these people are either overzealous Gin fans or just flat-out troublemakers, especially since several of them registered for the sole purpose of this argument. Heck, I'm pretty sure some of them (asides from the obvious ones) are the same people. They seem to have this delusion that they represent the silent majority. Anyway, good work handling all of the abuse Godisme; sorry this burden had to fall on your shoulders. Mohrpheus (talk) 04:05, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Hey do me a favor, could you help Haruhiisme with his signature problem and with uploading pics also show him the policies. I currently am working on the fight pages so i dont have much time to be helpful in that regard. Thank You. --<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  17:16, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks and LoL
Hey Thanks for the help, also I noticed your name and mine is almost the same thing, What a funny coincidence, I really like Haruhi and this is the only name I got on this site that did not involve me entering a bunch of numbers <font color="Red" face="Verdana">Haruhi <font color="black" face="Verdana">(im bored)  17:48, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

RE: User Troubles
Oh they are banned?? Meh!! Hehe felt good to rant, like if you are ranting at a wall, feels good to get it out!! I take it personal when the other me is insulted when I know he's an amazing contributor to the site that so many of those moaning winge-bags pale in comparison!! Which members are banned?? SunXia (talk) 20:44, August 30, 2010 (UTC)

but
but why does all other categories have capitals it should be Shinigami Captains not Shinigami captaians

I found your clones!
Haha took me a while but I finally found where your clones are coming from. It comes from |this forum, and pretty much has where all the people trying to revive Gin are from.

Here is confirmation that Haruhiisme is indeed the same person - http://www.bleachforums.com/showthread.php?44620-Gin-s-Status-on-Bleach-Wiki/page17

I know you aren't going to, but don't take anything these people say seriously. You do a lot of good work for this site, and as Mohrpheus said above, the more people that trash you like this, the better you are doing your job. Also, the main reason I'm showing you this in hopes that they'll stop trolling this wiki (since they seem to read everything that goes on here), and that things will finally become more peaceful here. TheDevilHand888 (talk) 18:04, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Haha, Devil they actually quoted you in their little insignificant thread, feel honoured my friend!! I love how they are so closed minded they think that Godisme actually thinks he is God!! At least they made me laugh, such brave souls insulting people on the internet and actually doing it behind their backs!! That thread link is in my favourites because it humoured me!! Thanks Devil!! And like Devil said and like we know you won't, don't listen to them, they deserve ity if anything else!! SunXia (talk) 00:34, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

My favourite part in the thread was the accusation of no lives yet they are the dudes that are commenting here then writing in that thread about if we reply!! Sorry you got the brunt of it, though Tinni and I both got called males, a fatty male in my case!! I'm keeping it favourited merely because their level of idiocy makes me chuckle!! SunXia (talk) 00:52, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Le sigh!! Tried making peace with those members but just too personally violated by simple rules!! Anyway, I'm doing text reduction in Orihime, I was a little too detailed!! But I'm not very good at it and Tinni said you're the master!! Would you read the first arc, removed some stuff but I dunno, mainly sticking to combining the References because they're like clogged flies!! SunXia (talk) 23:02, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

It's good to be back
Yeah I've been travelling for a while, finally got back to a stable internet connection so I thought I should stop the neglect of my duties. Yeah sure, I'm just going through what needs done as posted on the Grammar Corner page. I reckon I will get Barragan done tonight, but I will leave Aizen until tommorrow if thats fine. Enjoy your class. GinIchimaru (talk) 21:46, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

I've made a start on Aizen. But it's late here; I've got as far as the synopsis. <font color="red" face="Verdana">TomServo101 <font color="red" face="Verdana">(Talk)  22:07, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Turns out i wont be able to do Barragan tonight, got some stuff to do in the real world right now. But i'll get cracking with it first thing tommorrow. GinIchimaru (talk) 22:52, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

Actually I got stuff sorted, im free to do Baraggan now if you want or have you already started on his article? GinIchimaru (talk) 00:28, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Jeez, you seem to have your work cut out for you these days, I think it was Notorius B.I.G who said "Mo money mo problems" in your case it seems to be Mo edits Mo work haha.... anyway i will glady take Baraggans grammar workup off your hands if it lightens the load any. GinIchimaru (talk) 00:28, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

That sounds fair, I should be more active now so if you just leave me a message on any work that needs done then I will get on it asap GinIchimaru (talk) 00:55, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Response
No we dont need it as it undermines the site on the very policies that stablize the site. The rule set is for sites that can survive without vandalism or whatever have you which we do have a problem with Ill talk to the other admin about it. --<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  21:50, August 31, 2010 (UTC)

You know its funny when you first got on here we butted heads alot and you actually thought i was being mean and totalitarian which maybe partially true but after being here a while and seeing what has to be dealt with on the regular basis I suppose you see why we have the policies we have and why the admin or even Tinni comes down hard on people. Seeing as you have had to deal with it all first hand yourself. Note the frustration and the constant feeling of snapping because people can't comprehend simple things or follow simple rules. lol. --<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  01:31, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Admin Request User Block
Oh okay, I was just getting tired of all these troll accounts. But at least its done. L8er UraharaHitsugaya (talk) 02:26, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

Bleach Forums
Hey, I see you have made an account on Bleach Forums. I hope you enjoy it, there are some pretty funny and cool threads on there. Potterwatcher1997 (talk) 02:37, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

For future reference and as some constructive criticism, you probably could have avoided much of the immature antics of certain individuals had you used something like this instead of giving people a seemingly authoritarian impression of yourself.

"Thank you for trying to help us keep this wiki up to the highest standards of veracity, however, this issue is known and has been discussed several times already. The consensus regarding his [Gin's] status is that he is severely injured and is likely to die within the next issue or a following one if he has not passed on already. Unfortunately, we, the general consensus, are currently unable to precisely determine his status at this point in time, but due to limitations with the available choices for character status, the administrators believed that his current status is best reflected by being labeled as "deceased." Should new evidence be presented that directly contradicts this, the page will be updated accordingly to reflect this new information. Thank you and happy editing."

Granted that it is overly polite, but it would have prevented people being from antagonized and jumping to conclusions that inevitably let to an unnecessay fiasco. Kyrie Eleison (talk) 23:02, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

I'm an idiot too XD
Ah, don't worry about it. A lot of people have made the mistake over the years, some assuming I misspelled "Morpheus." I have to admit, I jacked up your name in my head pronunciation-wise. A few months back, I looked at it all as one word, and pronounced in my head as such - "Goh-dyez-may". And then I saw that you used the shortened sig "God" and realized that is was three separate words. D'oh! Mohrpheus (talk) 05:02, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

I won't say too much, but after Deicide20... I finally see that the Aizen you were a fan of truly is gone. Asides from being stupid powerful, Aizen now is... just plain stupid. Mohrpheus (talk) 00:06, September 2, 2010 (UTC)

Archiving
Thank you for the help. UraharaHitsugaya (talk) 12:58, September 1, 2010 (UTC)

What To Do
Hey, since your more likely to get this here even though I already sent this on the Bleach forums. Well, here. Hey, just wanted to say sorry for how everything turned out but I'm sure you understand why some of us took it this far. But that's behind us now, I would like to welcome you to the forums and hope you will stick around here for awhile. Also, I would like to help out with the Wiki. I am quite profound in grammar and can correct whatever needs correcting. If you let me know what I would need to do I shall do it. I'll head over and sign up for the Wiki now.

Do you know of anything that needs doing right now? Doesn't look like any pages need grammar correction atm and I would rather not do Fight Summaries right now until I'm more akin to exactly how to do everything. I'd rather start small but can't find any pages that need editing.

Me again, lol. Can you head to Ryūken's page and scroll down to his equipment section and tell me what you think of my edit on his Quincy bow. It had nothing prior to my edit, I can't think of anything else to add. I just want your opinion of my first edit.--PoquesAssistant (talk) 00:58, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Alright cool. It looks like it's lacking but the problem is that's the only time we see him use his powers, would really help to see more so we can edit more. I'll probably edit the Quincy Cross a bit too. Do I have to list my name and incomplete? I don't see much else I could change.

I'm not really sure what else needs to be done on Ryūken's page. I finished editing his Quincy Cross description which I think turned out quite well. I don't wanna mark it as complete since I'm not sure why exactly it was put up as needs editing although since his Equipment section was blank I assume that's all that needed it. --PoquesAssistant (talk) 04:35, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Kaname, again
I was watching ep.60 on youtube, and Aizen himself said the following, ''Those who can't see can't fall for Kyoka Suigetsu, and thats why Kaname is my subordinate. ''So can it be that Kaname is stronger than the pre-hogyoku Aizen? I also agree with you on the ressureccion though, as he is just asking for defeat, because he gains eye-sight. Morgan silve (talk) 21:44, September 5, 2010 (UTC)Morgan silve

Still, Kaname is a shinigami/hollow; a hybrid; to simplify it, a vizard. This will augment his strengths, and speed, thus matching him with the pre-hogyoku aizen. Kaname probrably follows him because of Justice, nothing else; though this justice thing is my opinion, I really think thats the case though.

PS- Check out my totaly weird wikia, http://doradies.wikia.com if you want, you can sign up on the Administrator's Project page, and I will consider you being an administrator. Feel free to bring other friends/accuaintenses to the site.....Morgan silve (talk) 21:53, September 5, 2010 (UTC)Morgan silve

Bonnie in episode 78
Hold on. I just watched the episode, and my edit is valid.

Sorry about not signing my post.

However, I'm not even talking about Bonnie, which is why I edited it. in episode 78, Ganju is in the world of the living, while Bonnie is in the Soul Society. the boar in episode 78 is not Bonnie, but a different boar that Ganju stole from the zoo in the world of the living. In fact, int the episode, he makes specific references to the boar not being as good as his boar back home. This is why I got rid of the reference to Bonnie. Ricorum (talk) 01:04, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm new at editing, so it's good to know what to do in detail. Ricorum (talk) 01:10, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:
Oh god, how did i forget that? i swear i knew not to reference those articles, guess is shouldnt edit when im up this late (3am here) thanks anyway.GinIchimaru (talk) 01:28, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Something Interesting
I noticed in the 13th and 0 Divisions image from the Masked book on the translation page, that under the Zero Division there is a picture of Rukia. Well I found out that the image is from chapter 48. Its page 8 of the manga scanlation, where she is talking about the Menos Grande. Now because this image is in the Masked book, does that prove a little more that the Zero Division takes care of the Menos Grande, or is that still speculation? Hisagi9 (talk) 03:07, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. Hisagi9 (talk) 03:16, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

Adam was in charge of the translation for that page, but I went ahead and did some independent research and posted on the MASKED talk page. Seems like Rukia was indeed talking about the Royal Guard - perhaps at the time Kubo was trying to build up hype for the Gillians. Not so different from the case with the Vasto Lordes, eh? Well, I suppose an admin or translator needs to check it out before it can be official. Mohrpheus (talk) 11:53, September 6, 2010 (UTC)

toshiro hitsugaya
When reading the outline of his zanpakuto, it came to my attention that one small part was missing in the description. That is the chain with a crescent blade that is attached. This is most evident in the fight against Gin Ichimaru.

Please edit this when you can.Evil 1 (talk) 03:53, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

My post on the grammar corner.
What did you find insulting?Licourtrix (talk) 01:39, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Grammar Check on Aizen's page
This message was left on Salubri's page:
 * "Hey Salubri, I wasn't talking about the content of what was being said itself. I was actually referring to grammatical errors and such. There is a lot in Aizen's page that needs looked at, especially in the part about his fourth form. So whenever it gets unlocked Grammar Corner needs to take a look at his page. Ltjuno (talk) 17:13, September 9, 2010 (UTC)"

Being a great fan of Aizen, I thought you might want look into this for yourself as soon as the page is open for editing again. <font color="teal" size="2px">Arrancar109 <font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)  17:16, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Kaname
Yes, I know that, but didn't they all say that Kaname was now a Hollow (not a Shinigami with Hollow powers, but a straight-up Hollow)? I know I'm not as familiar with Bleach as you guys, but isn't it possible for Shinigami's to become normal Hollows too, not just humans? Glorious  CHAOS!  20:08, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Aizen's game debut
Aizen's video game debut is wrong, he first appeared in ''Bleach GC: Death Gods Meeting in the Twilight which came out in 2005. Could you change it on his page?Naruto 45 (talk) 18:02, September 10, 2010 (UTC)''

RE game
I put in his page but the words are red not blue do you konw how I can change it Naruto 45 (talk) 18:40, September 10, 2010 (UTC)                                                                    their is an article for the game Naruto 45 (talk) 18:52, September 10, 2010 (UTC)

I apologize, Mr. Godisme
I do not have any intention of vandalizing Aizen's article at all. What can we do to High Intellent? It has been argued to death, and that he is not a genius. Excellent Intellect? <span style="border-left:1px solid red; border-top:1px solid red; border-right:1px solid red; border-bottom:1px solid red;">Dekoshu talk contrib 03:30, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

I truly do love Sosuke Aizen quite a lot, both his usual self (no Hougyoku at all) and his Hougyoku transformations. However, the fourth one is when Aizen claims it doesn't want him to lose to a mere human. He is one of the people that I love along with the others. I'm sorry about what happened to Aizen, man, and I don't mean this with sarcasm. I mean it with honesty. Now, he is going to suffer the "Final Getsuga Tenshou". Does he deserve better not just in pain, but also his role as a central antagonist? <span style="border-left:1px solid red; border-top:1px solid red; border-right:1px solid red; border-bottom:1px solid red;">Dekoshu talk contrib 03:45, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Absence
Hey man, just to let you know that i wont be on here for about a week and a half as im off to France for abit, so i wont be editing on the Grammar corner til i return. Have fun without me haha. GinIchimaru (talk) 13:52, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Ichigo and the magic lamp
Ichigo and the magic lamp was based on a colour spread from the Soul Society Arc. It was reprinted in All Colour But The Black and the comment for it read "2005 WJ #21/22 Double issue poster". I am not entirely sure which chapter that corresponds to though. If you want to have a look, the image can be found here. Tinni  (Talk)  14:12, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Tia's Profile Pic
Hey, God. (Lol)

I was wondering if any of the admins were going to sort out Tia's profile picture, as her current one isn't really that great.

If their is some sort of issue, do you think we should have a discussion.

I would do something about it but I've got no idea about getting images with all the rules of your Image Policy.

Hopefully this can be sorted quickly. Thanks dude. TotalDrama22121. When worlds collide...it's dramatic. 16:21, September 11, 2010 (UTC)

Why did you reply?
I believe I specifically said please do not reply, and that I wasn't going to get drawn into a pointless argument with you people. Now leave me alone, I don't care what you think, what I did was not junk trivia and was not wrong, stop arguing with me about it. Good day.

Seriosuly, I've been nice about this. BACK OFF. Leave me alone, it was not junk trivia, you guys are just a bunch of dictators. Now back off and stop bothering me with your pointless arguments, I have better things to do then waste my time arguing with you about something that was perfectly justifiable.

I don't care what your definition of junk trivia is, I already know it's wrong. I'm not making any edits on a wiki run by dictators, for the last time, LEAVE ME ALONE.

I did not say that I would add whatever I want, I said I'd add all the fun facts that is trivia I want, and that I would never post anything false. Block me and I'll just make a new account and do it all over again. But, instead of us constantly going at each others throats, perhaps we can come to an agreement. You don't want things involving fans in the triva, and I want to post things though you falsely accuse me of adding junk trivia. Is there perhaps a fan page? Or perhaps you need to make a new fan article? I know things would go much more smoothly between you and everyone else I suspect you've gotten into conflicts with if there was something part of the wiki that could have fan info posted on it. If there isn't one might I suggest making one, and if there already is one mind pointing me in the direction of it?

I didn't say fan info. Fanon wiki's are horrible, the characters there contain more plotholes than Dragon Ball Z, plus fanon wiki's are for fan's own characters, locations and powers, not actual Bleach characters or their opinions on them. What I mean is a wiki article based on what fans think about characters current status, and debates fans often have about characters. It should be fair to post what fan's think of the characters in the trivia section, but for whatever reason you people are against that. So I suggest making a new article about it on this wiki. Forum's are fine, but they're for talking about the characters. What I tried to do was state a fun fact about what many fans think, like how they often clash over the death of Tia Harribel simply because her wounds were some of the smallest wounds Bleach has ever offered. I think it is not only fair to have something like this, but it will also relieve some tension about this "junk trivia" thing you guys have going on. I know I'm not the only person you've clashed with over it.

RE: Trouble User
Well by his own admission he has no intentions of using this site any longer. Whether he chooses to understand why there are rules and guidelines here and why its necessary to be strict about them is his business. He chooses not to understand or follow said rules and chooses to lump every wiki together as if their content and criteria for doing things are the same. Then he chooses to be the type of user who feels people are being dictators because they wont allow you to do what you want on the site. Well we don't force anyone to be here and if he makes any edits in the future not in the line with the manual of style and the guidelines of the sight you can then inform an admin about the situation. --<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  03:42, September 12, 2010 (UTC)

Clones
Sorry about that.

I thought quasi- meant "up to four"

What is the difference between quasi-clones and clones then, just for definition sakes. :)

Re: Links
'Kay, whatever. --Reikson (talk) 03:38, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

I thought I had put an end to the obnoxious "we hate redirect" movement but apparently not. Do not tell editors they cannot use perfectly good redirects. I don't know where you got the impression that redirects were not okay but they are. The | thing should only be used when there is no redirect or is necessary. Where there is a redirect, editors are free to use it. Tinni  (Talk)  04:12, September 14, 2010 (UTC)

Only committee member that I know of who has issues with redirects is Weedefinition and he knows that whatever his own quark, he can't force others to use the | if they don't want to. That's the stance. If anyone wants to use the | that's fine. But it is not a "fix" and it is not required. We have had users in the past go around editing whole article taking out redirects and calling them fixes. That's an obnoxious waste of time edit and should be discouraged. However, if someone like to spell things out while they are writing stuff, that's fine. We don't require them to use redirects and we don't discourage the use of redirects. I have however made a note on the committee page. This should clear up this issue once and for all. Tinni  (Talk)  04:25, September 14, 2010 (UTC)