User talk:Yaujj75

Soul King edits
Look, I understand you mean well, but let me explain why me and Xilinoc undid your edits on the Soul King page. First of all, when Xilinoc asked you to reference your edits, he did not mean "copy paste a URL to a completely random Reddit post". That's not how we work around here. Secondly, your edits are not very necessary; they're just rewording existing lines that were already written well enough. And finally, your edits also contain some spelling and grammar errors. Hence why we prefer the older versions. Timjer (talk) 09:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, it is just that the wording can misinform people that the Soul King is destroying the world by killing the Hollows whereas it is actually Soul King stabilize the world and the five Noble Families seek to improve the stagnant world mentioned in the Reddit post. I am sorry I made a mess here. I just wish to make sure there is no misunderstanding. Yau JJ the Editor (talk) 10:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Actually, that is wrong. The SK did not stabilize the world by killing the Hollows, quite the opposite. To literally quote CFYOW: "However, it was not as though the stagnation of the world had been averted by the simple act of destroying the Hollows. The Reio continued in that way to protect the world that would have slowly melted into chaos." So you see, the world was already stagnant thanks to the Hollows. The SK's actions only made things worse. Timjer (talk) 11:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that is the debatable part which the Reddit post argued. Perhaps the world is going to chaos but not in a immediate sense. The Five Families wanted to improve the world, not fix it although perspective to tell whether improve the world is consider a fix. Of course, the Soul King is neither improving or worsening the situation in my opinion. But I guess there are many interpretation to that quote, and I just follow one that I just read from the Reddit post. Yau JJ the Editor (talk) 11:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Well, I read that Reddit post by now, and I realized they have a point. While I cannot know what the OG Japanese version of the novel says exactly, I fully understand that even in official translations some of the nuances can be lost. Hence why I carefully reworded the SK article myself, to better represent what is most likely meant by the text without deviating from the translations too much. Timjer (talk) 11:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you and sorry for the business. To be honest, I am not a great of an editor which I accidentally mess up the edit there. Have a nice day. Yau JJ the Editor (talk) 12:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Re: Lost Agent Arc Timeline Minor Discussion
Hi there. So the timeline statement in the manga is slightly ambiguous - Ichigo muses that it's been 17 months since the White War, and you can interpret that as the day of battle itself (November 1st) where Aizen and his forces are defeated, or the day Ichigo woke up and lost his powers (December 2nd). The wiki goes with the former interpretation since he specifically mentions the battle, not him waking up and losing his powers, so the conclusion from that is that the timeskip begins in April - and this would also track because the Fullbring arc was intended as a "soft reboot" of the series, so with the original arc also starting in April that would be another storytelling parallel. So that's why we have it listed that way on the timeline.--Xilinoc (talk) 07:03, 12 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Make sense. I guess you don't mind if I replace the May to April. Thanks for the enlightenment.Yau JJ the Editor (talk) 07:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Re: Relationships, Potential New Section
Hmm, you have a very good point about the fact that Jin Kariya's entire personality section is extremely bloated and could use trimming. But I'm not sure if we truly need a "relationships" section for side characters like that... You know, perhaps bring it up with Xilinoc, in the meantime I'll try to make up my mind. Timjer (talk) 14:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Got it. Extra question, what other admin and content moderator in this wiki should I know so I can contact others instead? This exclude Xilinoc. And you are right on the side characters since sometimes their relationship is minimal. But main characters is hard to ignores because Ichigo relationships are very interesting as the Echo of the Force (Jedi Exile and Knights of the Old Republic 2 reference.) Yau JJ the Editor (talk) 14:32, 15 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Well, Bleach Wiki:Administrators lists the current admins. Though I'm not sure how up-to-date that is as Yyp has been inactive for some time now. I suggest aside from Xilinoc to try asking FutureEeveeKing13 or SunXia. Timjer (talk) 14:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Re: Relationship, Potential New Section
Hi there. So I saw that discussion, and I'm aware that the One Piece wiki uses this type of section for pretty much every character to a fairly useful effect - however, I'm not convinced we really need it here. Kubo doesn't write nearly as much dialogue as Oda does, so you don't get tons of relationships concretely established for most characters in Bleach like you do in One Piece, and consequently it would be largely stubs for most characters outside of Ichigo, Kariya, and a select few others. Additionally, when I overhauled Kariya's page a couple years ago, I made sure to up the detail and points of information across the entire article, particularly for his personality section, because what we had before was piss-poor, bare-bones, etc. - I consciously chose to detail the five key relationships he has with Ichigo, Uryū, Koga, Ichinose, and Yoshino because each draws out a distinct aspect of his personality that you don't otherwise see, and it's important to explain how their own personality and actions do so to provide context. Knowing that it's different from detailing his general behavior, though, I made sure to keep those paragraphs grouped together and located after the "conclusion" of his general personality paragraphs to mark the start of a different part of the explanation (and to bridge the gap between that and the "in combat" paragraph I gave all the Bount), and I don't see that as particularly confusing - people seem to have gotten by just fine not only with that page, but with several other pages across the wiki that have detailed specific character relationships in the personality section to outline part of that character's, well, character.--Xilinoc (talk) 06:21, 16 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, when I mean section, I meant this section [|examples] and this [|example]. Not the One Piece Wiki section I was talking about.

So it is ok to have relationships in the personality section? Could you give me examples of other wikis? And this wikis as well. Yau JJ the Editor (talk) 07:39, 16 May 2023 (UTC)