Forum:Canon

I'm not trying to change any policies with this post just opening up some fun discussion since this is a forum, but I wondered why most people consider Canon only from the Manga. I understand the main concept of Kubo drew it therefor it is Canon, the Anime he did not draw it and is not involved on a daily basis so it can not be canon. I understand that. But what I wanna know is why it is different then say star wars for example. there are books written by authors other then george lucas that become star wars canon because they are approved by Lucas. I would assume the same could be said about manga. I was reading interviews with kubo and he is given the amine on tape before it is aired, he sees the movies before they are made even giving suggestion like with the diamond dust rebellion saying to add, "execute hitsugiya toushiro" because he thought it would shock fans. so what im getting at is, they wouldn't do anything that kubo didn't like with the anime or movies because he sees them and gives some input albeit not on a everyday or probably every week basis. But i bring this up with the recent speculations of kouga and the kuichki family. I dont think they would add something kubo didn't like or would have planed on doing something down the road. Anyways i wanted the opinions of some people on apart from "if he didnt draw it its not canon" answer. IMO i look at the anime and movies and quasi canon cause even if it is minimal involvement kubo has sometype of hand in it. just wanted to specualate with other peoples on here. Shillagan 02:12, December 23, 2009 (UTC)