Talk:Soul King

Appearance
"He does not have any arms or legs.", that seems to be an incorrect statement, as his right and left arms are just detached, so we should rewrite it to something like "he is not shown to have any legs, while his arms are separate entities". The former statement made it sound like he never had his arms to begin with. Yatanogarasu (talk) 19:48, July 30, 2015 (UTC)


 * That logic doesnt follow. There are plenty of people in the world that have no arms or legs for various reasons. I dont think anyone describing them would assume that from the onset they never had any arms or legs to begin with. They would only assume that they dont have what they cant see and what is the story behind the reasoning for that. The same reason would apply here. Also we dont understand the circumstances behind why the appendages arent attached, the fact that they are separate entities is a completely other story and when be handled accordingly but that has no bearing on the appearance description of what we see of the soul king.--