User talk:MarqFJA

Welcome
Welcome to Bleach Wiki! Thanks for your edit, and thanks for joining our community! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.


 * Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help.


 * Questions? You can ask on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!


 * Need help? You can find it right here! You can also find a full list of help pages here.


 * Don't know what to do? The Community Portal has an outline of the site, and has links to pages to get you started!


 * Please sign in every time you edit, so that we can recognize you!


 * Here are some more pages you might find useful:


 * Policy - follow this to ensure harmony on the wiki
 * Manual of Style - a guide to how articles here are organized and written
 * Spoiler Policy - follow this to not ruin upcoming stories for those yet to read or watch the new chapter or episode


 * Sign your name in discussions by typing ~ , which automatically adds your signature and the date, so we know who's talking!

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Yyp (Talk) 23:01, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

Romanji query
Hey, since you seem to have knowledge of Japanese, I was wondering if you would be willing to address an issue that has been brought up on Shunsui Kyōraku talk page regarding the romanji of Bushō Koma. It's alright if you don't want to. Thank in advance whichever way. Tinni  (Talk)  17:59, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

No I wasn't going to ask you to translate stuff. ^.^ Thanks for responding. Tinni  (Talk)  19:02, January 17, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Not A Name
While i understand your pushing for technical accuracy Tomservo101 is right it has in most occasions when others address him they use the word Genryusai as a prefix to his name, acknowledging the title of honor. Originally every thing i had seen had his name listed as Shigekuni Yamamoto-Genruysai. Which didn't seem right to me especially since from what I understand Japanese dont use - in their name formations. When it became more apparent that it was a honorific that justified somethings for me. But Bleach character book souls on all pages that mention him give his name as Genruysai Shigekuni Yamamoto. so it was changed to reflect official printed version. Then it was confirmed later that it was a honorific. While again i understand your want for accuracy then names as all names on the site is in a western format. If you consider that it should be some other way that would be counter to that purpose. Salubri (Talk)  23:08, January 19, 2010 (UTC)

Re: "Hollow-Shinigami"/"Shinigami-Hollow" hybrids
Well thats interesting and new I'll have to talk to the other admin about what you have found, though it seems he didn't give an actual term to what such a being would be called but rather the process in creation. Using what you found cant be obviously used to describe a species. As far as the other stuff if you can find the chapter i will also ask Adam if he can check as well what the issue of Aizen's concept of the arrancar situation. Salubri (Talk)  18:33, February 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Katen Kyoukotsu
I saw you reply. I merely didn't want to continue cluttering the talk page further discussing that particular issue. Tinni  (Talk)  02:01, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: possible Resurreccion mistakes/mistranslations/etc.
I'm not very good with translations, but I've asked someone who is to give an opinion on it. -- Yyp (Talk) 23:01, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Enhanced Strength/etc., Immense Strength/etc., what's the difference?
It stands to reason that there are gonna be differences in ability between individual characters. The best way to gauge such things is by giving them a level that is easily understandable. What is commonly used in strength is Enhanced & Immense. On average Shinigami mostly have shown to be either average in strength as any normal human or soul would be. While other characters have shown greater strength hence the use of the term enhanced (i.e. more then average). In other cases characters have shown an excess of strength far trumping that of others so therefore its considered immense. You probably have noticed only certain characters have the distinction of Immense strength and rightly so after having seen them in action.Salubri (Talk)  01:30, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Well seeing as you seem to have an attitude about it im not sure having a conversation is what your looking for suffice to say there really needs to be no justification especially seeing as your not aware of some the dealings of the pages to question their integrity in a way that seems more to do with your personal preference or misconception of how the pages are to be done rather then accuracy. As far as Ichigo is concerned his strength class as immense was in error and has been corrected. As far as Yammy is concerned his page has yet to be overhauled and there are plenty of inaccuracies on the page that will be dealt when when the page is properly edited. As the 4th Espada Ulquiorra strength outmatches Yammy's ability to defend against such blows while he is unreleased.Salubri (Talk)  02:40, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

There apparently should possibly be something listed on manuel of style in reference to that, seeing as there is already some things in question and it could help maybe I'll see what can possibly be done.Salubri (Talk)  03:37, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Well I added the section on the Manuel of Style. Check it and see if that properly explains the situation.Salubri (Talk)  04:08, March 25, 2010 (UTC)

Talk Pages
Hi. Please note that the article talk pages are only intended for discussions about the content and maintenance of the article. Your post on the Talk:Hollow page has been moved to Forum:Hollows. -- Yyp (Talk) 20:22, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that page out - it shouldn't be like that. -- Yyp (Talk) 21:18, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

User boxes
No problems. Yes there is a small selection of them that can be found at: http://bleach.wikia.com/wiki/Category:Userboxes. A lot of them were made by me for the various projects and the committee. Indeed, most of the boxes are linked to editing status. The only two general support user boxes are the Gotei 13 support box and the Espada support box (I should modify that one to make it look nicer). I did do a mock userbox to identify myself as a Ichimaru Gin fan but it's not available for general use. I didn't make it into one because I didn't think anyone but me would be using it. :) Tinni   (Talk)  17:04, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

You don't. At least, you don't make user boxes like those user boxes when the box is just suppose to be for you/you don't know if anyone else will use it. The way those boxes are constructed are for easy sharing/use by multiple people. However if you want to just have something on your userpage that looks like a user box then you can recycle the wiki code of existing user boxes and stick them on your user pages, customising them by changing the pic, the words and the colour if you feel so inclined. For example, below is the mock userbox is made for myself regarding Gin. Tinni  (Talk)  22:08, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Censorship of Mila-Rose's Resurreccion form?
Its up on Talk:Mila-Rose. -- Yyp (Talk) 22:18, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Not receiving any e-mail notifications for watched pages, announcements, etc.
I don't use the weekly digest email feature, so I can't be sure. Assuming that your preferences are set correctly there is no reason that you should not receive the updates, but perhaps you could disable the settings and then re-select them. Don't know if that will help, but it is worth a try I guess. If you're still not recieving them after that, I suggest reporting it to the Wikia staff at Special:contact. If it is a glitch, or just something wrong with your settings, they'll be able to sort it out (hopefully). Welcome back, btw. Yyp (Talk) 11:09, June 15, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Recent edits to Tia Harribel's article
They can all come out I think, though if you can improve upon it you are welcome to try. The new bit in the P&A section is not referenced, the appearance bit doesnt read very well. And the History bit feels tacked on as if there was little attempt to integrate it with the text. The trivia is already gone. 20:58, August 19, 2010 (UTC)