User talk:Mohrpheus

Re:Character Statuses
I'm not in favour of restoring them right now and I don't know if there is support out there for doing this (atm). The statuses are a minor, trivial thing and having (very, very negative) arguments over something so small & trivial is not helping anyone. I have little doubt that the trouble will just flare up again. They were a distraction from doing actual work on the wiki as well as causing unnecessary agro. We have too much (more important) stuff on our plate right now with the masked thing and the new look etc. That's my view on it any. 22:58, September 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Discussion
Well allow me to apologize for jumping down your throat in public. Your right if there is an issue I should have brought it up to you here from jump. Basically apart of your job as not just as an active user who contributes greatly to the site but as a committee member is to handle those issues on your own. The reason i was mad about it is that it seemed that twice on two separate occasions instead of defending the content or the site and handling the situation in doing so. You basically sided with the person making the complaint without even checking whether the point was valid or whether anyone agreed with it before bringing it up as something that should be handled. The reason i bring up to you as the others dont seem to have that issue. All the other committee members handle the situation right then and there. A user who speaks up with get answered it doesn't need a second endorsement to do so. Everytime you do so its like saying if someone on your level is questioning it then it must need to change. As a dedicated user you should know the content enough to know more then most people who make mere assumptions. --Salubri (Talk)  02:27, September 30, 2010 (UTC)

None at all. Im just so tired of having to defend every single thing since the status issue and there's this new skin issue, where we might be losing content anyway unless we move. --Salubri (Talk)  03:17, September 30, 2010 (UTC)