Talk:Wandenreich Members

Reason
is this necessary? Whats the harm in giving them their own articles? they obviously will be given more information later on when we see them fight, so i dont see the harm. Plus we have far more irrelevant and minor characters with their own pages anyways.--RexGodwin (talk) 18:08, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

The reason is cause it is what the manual of style dictates. Other characters will be handled as well in the same manner. These random minor pages of low quality all over the place arent productive so from now on there are characters that are considered minor characters until they get more development. They wont be automatically getting their own pages any longer.--

It's rather annoying having to go through it, but I guess it's a fine precaution to take until they get more development. When we see their abilities in greater detail, and naturally see them fight, will they get their own pages by then? Serocco (talk) 20:24, June 26, 2013 (UTC)

As I stated with further development of character there will be a plan to move him/her to their respective pages.--

Will we move Loyd, Royd and Shaz, for example, on this page? Serocco (talk) 00:03, June 27, 2013 (UTC)


 * Lloyd possibly im not sure about shaz but rroyd will likely stay with his own page considering the significant part and thus the large amount of content on his page. These minor characters essentially had little in the way of story in the series such as lloyd and the other 2 killed by kenpachi but still figuring that out.--

I disagree with BG9 being present on this page. Despite the fact that he has only one speaking line, he stole Soi-Fon's bankai and fought her. I'm sure that BG9 will eventually get his own page, but I was just throwing in my two cents. Marioman53 (talk) 10:43, June 27, 2013 (UTC)

Unnamed Stern Ritter
Can we add unnamed Stern Ritter to this page like in Soul King Palace Residents? For example, there is this bearded Geh Geh Geh guy http://www.mangareader.net/bleach/543/15 http://www.mangareader.net/bleach/500/12

His distinctive way of laughing indicates this is the same character. SonMati (talk) 13:28, June 27, 2013 (UTC)

Askin Nakk Le Vaar
It is never explicitly stated/shown in the manga that Askin Nakk Le Vaar confronted Jushiro Ukitake.

The source[3] for this statement is false, too. In the given page there is no frame with Ukitake, on the following page you can only see his opponent from behind.

Rafer.Alston (talk) 20:50, June 30, 2013 (UTC)

I would have to say that the grounds for claiming Askin confronted Ukitake are tenuous at best. Maybe he did, but that back of head shot doesnt constitute proof for me. 22:18, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

BG9 and Black Quincy
do tell, why does Cang Du get a page when BG9 has had about the same amount of screentime? and can we add the black geh geh geh Quincy on this page?--RexGodwin (talk) 11:09, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

Actually Cang Du had more screen time, while BG9 has had a total appearance in 4 chapters (495, 496, 497 & 543) Cang Du has had 7 (495, 496, 497, 505, 507, 512 & 543) plus his battle with Toshiro was shown a bit more than BG9 battle with Sui Feng. Also we don't known the name for the Black Quincy yet so we can't add him. CoolJazzman (talk) 20:17, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

the old guy has no name either.....--RexGodwin (talk) 21:28, July 3, 2013 (UTC)

Revolver Ocelot is an exception because he has had a significant amount of panel time and we have seen enough of his abilities to put something together. Despite the likelihood of "Geh Geh Geh" being the same guy, we need more visual confirmation since we saw the lower half of his body in one instance, and the upper half the next. Mohrpheus  (Talk)  21:44, July 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * The black Quincy's name is Yajiuma. Its on page 17 of Mangastrem's translation. I think its the same for Mangahere. Askin says "His Majesty doesn't like infightig. Besides, Yajiuma's got his 'eye' on you."  ~ ~ Ten Tailed Fox   < t al k > 00:59, July 4, 2013 (UTC)


 * Stream's "Yajiuma" translation is wrong. In Cnet's (one of the more trusted translators we go by) translation, the line was "And besides... We should also consider the eyes of onlookers." Mohrpheus   (Talk)  01:27, July 4, 2013 (UTC)

Occupation and Affiliation
Hey I have been trying to add the Occupation and Affiliation of each of these Stern Ritters just like the ones with there own pages but from some reason they don't show after I edit they didn't come up.CoolJazzman (talk) 20:24, July 3, 2013 (UTC)


 * Thats because the minor template does not contain coding for occupation and affiliation. It therefore cant be added simply by typing the sections in their, they simply werent included due to space issues.--