Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-27140233-20151102183905/@comment-44061-20151103135251

Your basically trying to pick at random here. The point is the theories arent supported and in order to support them you overlook certain points of fact to fit your argument. Yamamoto is allowing one to see flames, the flames dont really exist. "Could be" doesnt mean "is" which is my point, this is a fact that is stated in the series. Also your advancing the concept of "wear". In this instance we mean actual form change of something over the clothes or new clothes. Not a weapon which is simply what Jakuho Raikoben is as well as Tekken Tachikaze. Komamura's bankai takes the the form of a giant samurai but he isn't wearing it, also it being linked to him doesnt change the fact that he isnt wearing it but controlling it. As i stated before Ichigo, Rukia, Renji and maybe Hitsugaya (whose form changed temporarily because its ice, which is easy to change, but more importantly because of the hollow influence at the time he got it back). Also to make the point that a bankai changes based on a wielders mental/physical state isnt a universal concept. Komamura had a special technique that isnt inherent to a shinigami but to one that comes from his specific tribe. He is the only one of his tribe to become a shinigami and he has a specific kind of bankai. In turn he has a one time technique that corresponds to his bankai that is unique to him due to how it works because of the unique technique he used to change himself. Huge exception, very unique still not something one can say he wears, that argument is about connection but more importantly only affects him. Ichigo you cant even use as a argument due to the rampant inconsistency and the fact of him not being a normal shinigami, if he was then you might have something. Both are special circumstances that arent reflective of a typical shingiami situation. Also once again the FGT is a technique of his bankai and not his bankai itself.