Talk:Ulquiorra Cifer

Number
I added to the trivia that Ulquiorra's Espada rank is said to be Cuatro instead of Cuarta, but was undone. I get it, maybe isn't relevant to the trivia, but when I delete the same trivia thing on Harribel's article, was undone too. So, why here can't go but over there can?--EvilDragonLord (talk) 18:00, September 23, 2012 (UTC)
 * Kubo makes spanish mistakes, this is nothing new nor noteworthy. However, Harribel introduced herself differently than the others, instead of saying Tercera (3rd) she said tres (3). This is noteworthy as it is not a spanish mistake but is something she did that no one else did.--

Actually, Ulquiorra introduces himself as Cuatro Espada (on chapter 271), even the article itself said so.--EvilDragonLord (talk) 19:14, September 23, 2012 (UTC)

I'm not going to take any position here, but Cuatro = Four as opposed to Cuarto/Cuarta = Fourth. Make of it whatever you find convenient. -- Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  06:12, September 26, 2012 (UTC)

he did i believe to Ichigo, to confirm his words. --Rukiakuchiki3 (talk) 00:12, January 26, 2013 (UTC)

Powers and Abilities: Wings
In his released forms, Ulquiorra's has wings that can be used to deflect and shield from projectiles. This isn't stated in the article. How should this be added to the article? (i.e. under what heading should be used?) 00:30, April 9, 2013 (UTC)

Good shout! It was added by another editor. --SternRitterÄs (talk) 15:08, April 12, 2013 (UTC)

Ishida's quote
Does Ishida's quote about Ulquiorra's reiatsu really belong on the page? I personally think it's enough to note that Ishida, a Quincy, was able to note the tremendous reiatsu Ulquiorra possessed; I'm not sure his actual quote right afterwards really adds anything that hasn't already been established. It also looks kind of informal. Avolling (talk) 02:23, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, it's one thing to have him sense someone's Reiatsu, but the quote itself points out how strangely different it feels in comparison to the Reiatsu of other characters. That's pretty important.--Xilinoc (talk) 05:54, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * I think it could be removed actually... the reference points directly to the page that the quote is on anyway, and the description could be reworded to mention its density. We don't need to go out of the way to include direct quotes for everything. Mohrpheus   (Talk)  07:03, February 5, 2014 (UTC)
 * I back what Mohrpheus said. 12:33, February 5, 2014 (UTC)