User talk:Nwang2011

Welcome
Hi, welcome to Bleach Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Ichigo Kurosaki page.

Here's a wiki tip for you -- you can sign your name on talk/discussion pages by typing ~ which automatically adds your signature and the date.

Check out Help:Contents for more tricks. Also, remember that a wiki is a community, and that you'll almost always find someone to help you if you're having problems. Don't hesitate to ask for help! ;)

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Salubri (Talk) 05:59, June 28, 2009

Grammar Edits
I have noticed u coming here the past couple of days & doing many different Grammar edits & just wanted thank u so much. U'or work is appreciated. :) Minato88 05:28, November 7, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Characters
Separate lines. I just try to put them the way the camera panned. So if it went from left to right, then I'd list the characters in that order. And really, no one's going to bicker over whether they saw such-and-such character half a second before another one, so if it's a bit out of order, it's no biggie. :) Twocents 07:08, November 8, 2009 (UTC)

Edits
Actually it is out, I'm admin it really wouldn't make sense for me to to violate the spoiler policy. Though I'm not responsible for affirming what sites people have access to either so i understand your confusion if you only ascribe to one that hasn't got it yet. Salubri 05:14, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Ok I'm not exactly sure why you're vandalizing pages but don't, removing references is vandalism here. Salubri 05:40, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

You may not have been aware but anything pertaining to fights, events, invasions, wars and battles. Are a personal project and i have already told others not to touch them as i have yet to determine the format or layout as to what i want the articles done, hence why i protect each one i create now, some older ones havent been but i would hope i wont have to. Thank You. Salubri 01:24, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

Committee
Hi, I am Tinni, the leader of the project and standards committee. I see from your comments that you want to be part of the committee. However, I was not aware you had made a formal nomination. I see that you requested for rollback rights but I believe the admin position is that that's only for committee member and to nominate yourself for the committee you have to go to the committee page. That being said, I would like to point out that currently there are three people seeking committee membership and none of the three had sufficient contribution to be confirmed on the first round of voting. They haven't been denied but the admins are waiting on more contribution from them. Certainly your eagerness to help with the references project is a good step to get membership. So my suggestion would be to nominate yourself and state that you are helping with the reference project and you commitment to making this wiki the best it can be for all Bleach fans. The admins will be taking a very close look at your contribution history and the better it is, the more chance you have. Good luck and thanks for choosing to help with the referencing project. Tinni  (Talk)  08:52, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Policy & Standards Committee
As affirmed by the other Admin they agree with the nomination. You therefore have been made a lieutenant on the wiki and therefore now possess rollback rights (side note: please dont abuse it, otherwise the other admin will come down on your head with a wrath and take it away). Also you are now the 4th Seat of the Bleach Wiki:Policy & Standards Committee also reached through the community sidebar or just community page. Familiarize yourself with the additions on there as well as the Bleach Wiki:Policy and corresponding policies if you haven't already. so discussions are easier and have more room they can be had on the discussion page of the Policy & Standards Committee. Congrats. Salubri (Talk)  16:23, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

Also I have a project that will be very important for the wiki in general, as someone needs to head it, maybe you would be a good candidate for the project in that regard. Contact me and I will give you the details. Salubri (Talk)  16:33, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

Congrats and Archiving
Well, congrats on ur promotion. U r now a Lieutenant on Bleach Wikia and u can now display the on ur userpage if u want. Just reminding u that Rollback rights r for undoing vandalism, threatening comments, spoilers, or anything inappropriate. If it doesn't fit in these categories, then the undo feature is what should be used. Also, please remember to regularly check the Committee Talkpage for updates and conversations with the rest of the Committee.

Also, as a Lieutenant u will probably need the Archive feature in the future. Instructions can be found here and if u have any questions about Archiving, about the Committee, or anything, feel free to ask me, Tinni, or Mohrpheus. Minato (Talk)  16:58, January 8, 2010 (UTC)

Project
Considering how well you have done on the edits and so forth. I think it is time to initiate the fights project and you should be the one to head up the project. The way I would work it out is that currently the pages are basically put together and i currently makes others when possible. But there are so many that to keep others from editing them before they are ready i have protected most of them. So what can happen is you can start from the soul society arc i can unlock five pages and you can do them at whatever pace you feel and then once they are done you can let me know and i unlock 5 more and so on. I just wanna make sure the pages are informed and detailed as well as properly referenced. There is a layout that i will put together for the pages as well pictures to be added. A good reference to use would be the saga pages as the point will most ultimately to replace them entirely on the sight. So every fight, battle, event should contain any information the saga pages on the site does. Any questions let me know. Salubri (Talk)  23:19, January 9, 2010 (UTC)

Well basically you can have more then yourself or the committee work on it, just be sure to watch the pages, I have pretty much done the info boxes on them. So for the most part others will be allowed to edit as well, the pages are largely locked but i think the plan will be for 5 to be opened up and after those are finished five more and so on. As for the layout i have listed how they are supposed to go in the layout page. Its to be a basic summary no different then if it was explained on a character article. There will be no specific deadline other then making sure all 5 currently open are done before the next 5 are opened. Ill obviously go over the stuff to make sure they are handled correctly so you have a understanding of what they are expected to look like as far as the finished result is concerned. Salubri (Talk)  01:41, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Ok first thing is inform me when your on or gonna be on and ill unlock the first 5 for you. You will be starting with The Ryoka Invasion. You will see that someone has already tried to do it but its not up to standard. What you will need to do is check the layout guide for (Events) and use that to note what should be placed on the article. You will obviously need to get pictures but thats after the article is set up and done properly and you will need to make sure the information is properly referenced. If you need any help in these regards then let me or another admin or committee member know. The other four pages up to you will be Ichigo Kurosaki vs. Jidanbō Ikkanzaka, Ichigo Kurosaki vs. Ikkaku Madarame, Yumichika Ayasegawa vs. Ganju Shiba, Uryū Ishida vs. Jirōbō Ikkanzaka. Take note that some of the battles will be relatively small and unimportant but they happened none the less so even if the information is small compared to other articles dont worry you did the best you could considering the circumstances and thats fine. Salubri (Talk)  18:46, January 18, 2010 (UTC)

So are you currently going to be on today then?Salubri (Talk)  18:18, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Ok well I have opened the 5 pages so you should be able to edit them now.Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  19:03, January 23, 2010 (UTC)

Project 2
Well I figured they really need to get done as the finished articles will take a bigger roll on the site. Im not really too concerned as of right now with the Ryoka Invasion article, but the project has to push forward. Hopefully you will be able to get more done as the project goes on.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  03:52, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Fight Summary
Hey, thanks for the message. I'd like to apologize for intruding on the project. I was just trying to help. If there is any other fight summery you'd like me to do, please let me know. Maggosh 14:46, March 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Quick Question (Out of Curiosity)
It's not an official policy, and as far as I'm aware, it is not an unwritten rule either. I'd say it's more to do with it being rare to get a good shot of the Shikai without its user. I think File:Katen Kyōkotsu, Shikai Image.jpg would show off the Shikai much better than the picture that is there, as the white background makes it a bit harder to see. -- Yyp (Talk) 12:53, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

The picture is good but one thing to remember it is a written rule that you never place a picture on the left hand side of the powers and abilities section.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  14:59, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Really? I must have missed that little detail and probably will need to re-read the rules again. Still, thanks for telling me that! - Mr. N 15:04, March 20, 2010 (UTC)

Fight Summary Edits
Its come to my attention after the fact that the edits your doing on some of the fights aren't in the correct format. It is supposed to come from an in-universe point of view. Never use the terms "in the manga or in the anime", we are not supposed to denote a difference. We also should never talk as if we are readers or watchers in real life watching a story, the account should read as from a someone really there in the world who happens to know all the techniques and motivations. Manga always takes precedent over the anime and in the case that the anime adds on to fights we continue from where it leaves off in the manga, write the anime portion in reference it and only acknowledge that it only happened in the anime, but only in the reference. We then go back to where the anime and manga continue along the same story using the manga again. None of the pages should be written from the anime unless they are anime only. Also The stories need to be fleshed out. Action for action and word for word is fine we aren't really doing summaries so much as explaining the fight in great detail. They also should all be in present tense regardless if they have taken place months or years ago. I have already listed two fights in the arrancar invasion that require me to go over them a second time, im not sure about whats in need of help in the ryoka invasion and i have noticed that currently Renji vs. Granz that your currently doing has the same problems. Hopefully we have it straightened out now.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  16:54, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

Don't forget to flesh out the information on the Vizard Training. It doesn't have to be incredibly extensive but as you see some of the sections are pretty small. Before Some pics are thrown in they just need a bit more information.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  15:39, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Toshiro v Luppi comments
Hi, Nwang

I'm sorry for the comments I made on your edits in the Toshiro v Luppi discussion page. I only spoke out what I thought was better for the article. Basically I wasn't so much criticizing your edits but more seeking an explanation for them, which I got from you and Salburi. If I was really certain of my position I would have simply revised it back to the way it was, but I wasn't so I took it to the discussion page. Regarding that, should I start writing all the fights in a play-by-play format from now on? Weedefinition  (Talk)  16:42, April 1, 2010 (UTC)