Bleach Wiki:Featured Article/Apr 11

'''Please, do not vote for a character ONLY because he/she is recently featured or you like him/her. Instead, vote for an article that is of good quality (i.e. it is informative, referenced properly, up to date, etc).''' (Note : Please, wait for six months before re-adding an already featured article to the list, characters that have been featured once in a year should not be featured again in that same year, thanks). Feel free to add characters we forgot to add, but consider that they MUST have been recently featured in the anime or manga.

The deadline is March 30, 2011. Any unsigned vote will be REMOVED before vote counting.

Votes
How to vote:


 * Vote by typing either of the following in the relevant sections:

Only one "Support" vote per user.

The "Oppose" option is to be used only to highlight issues with a candidate.

See the Voting Policy for more rules and guidelines on voting.


 * Apparently How to vote isn't clear. Everyone is asked to check the Voting Policy before engaging in votes. It is obvious some will engage in voting only to vote for the favorite character. That is not a Valid vote. Voting on what information is in the featured articles (i.e. voting because a character has revealed their Bankai or backstory), is not a Valid reason. Votes should be based on the quality of the article (i.e. nicely organized, in-depth information, properly referenced, free of speculation, decent grammar). Voting for an article obviously flawed and claiming it is better than one that doesn't suffer the same issue is not a valid vote, that is voting for more preferred character again.

Kūgo Ginjō

 * 1) I'm mixing things up. The same characters always get featured. Kūgo has a fantastic article, especially for just being introduced not too long ago. Taking a look at it, I was shocked to see it is one of the most well referenced articles we have. Not a single bit of information lacks a reference. For knowing so little about him, he has a very flushed out plot section, a history section as well as his fullbring section was just cleaned up a bit.--
 * 2) I also second God's support vote, as his article is of very high quality, a claim made even more outstanding by the fact that he is a relatively new character in the Bleach universe. Well referenced, plot background and history section have been written to the standard Bleach Wiki expects and strives to. Jirachiwish (talk) 06:21, March 20, 2011 (UTC)
 * 3) Even if he was introduced just recently, his plot section is very well built and the references have been added along the way perfectly, which is wonderful. I think a great job has been done in managing the bits of information on him that we've been getting each week, and the article has been put together really well, so imho, it deserves to be featured. -- Lia Schiffer   (Talk)  09:36, March 26, 2011 (UTC)


 * 1) A well written article but I think it's lacking in imagery, we all know I love my images in articles!! There's so much text, needs something more than just words!! Perhaps something to look into when get the chance!!  SunXia   (Chat)  21:18, March 20, 2011 (UTC)

Orihime Inoue

 * 1)  - I'm going to say Orihime here mainl because in the last six months it is another article that has been going through a major update and overhaul and a lot of work and effort was put into improving it's outdated standards and it is now looking in better shape than ever!!  SunXia   (Chat)  14:09, March 19, 2011 (UTC)
 * 2)  - I agree with SunXia! Orihime's article has improved so much over the last few months, and I believe that the hard work should be recognized. --Lemursrule (talk) 15:55, March 19, 2011 (UTC)

Deleted Votes
Any vote that is deemed invalid is moved here. Reasons why a vote may not be considered valid are set out in the Voting Policy.

Previously Featured Articles
(Bleach Wiki:Featured Article/Archive)