Bleach Wiki talk:Image Gallery

Picture Change Guidelines
As per the Image Policy, nominate and discuss changes to the profile pictures of the character articles here and only here. The typical requirements for a profile picture are that it shows the character facing forward, in their typical attire and should not be battle-worn. They should be centered, have good lighting, and be of good quality. Candidates also must have valid and complete and  templates attached to them or else they will be rejected.

Votes
How to vote:

{|align=right


 * }


 * Vote by typing either of the following in the relevant sections:

Only one "Support" vote per user. Votes will be open only for a week of the initial pic being placed. At the end of the week the highest rated pic will win. If no pick is a clear winner, than an admin with pick the pic. If another pic is brought up after the picture is picked then the voting begins again with the pic that has already been picked and the new pic or pics.

Cyan Sung-Sun
Lastly is good ol' Sung-Sun. As above, the Current has colors, but the Proposal is zoomed in/focused on her and has some more detail for her mask fragments.--Xilinoc (talk) 17:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) This is the one TB anime profile image I think works. Sung-Sun's character design is pretty black-and-white-focused to begin with, so the darker tones don't affect much, and the manga image needing to include part of Mila Rose and Apacci just to meet the size requirements for the infobox always irked me; now we have a version that cuts them out entirely! Oh, and the extra detail on her face is appreciated as well.--Xilinoc (talk) 17:21, 18 October 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) I wish the anime image were a little less fuzzy, but it still fits the profile picture guidelines better than the manga one.  Mohrpheus   (Talk)  02:28, 27 October 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) For me, the manga wins out only because of the distance of the shot. You get to see a bit more of Sung-Sun in the image. Plus the colors are more pleasing. The anime has no text bubbles, but that the only pro. Xeno Gotenks (talk) 15:58, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

NaNaNa Najahkoop
Bigger, better quality, shows his unique teeth better, no speech bubble... I don't see any real downsides myself. Timjer (talk) 13:54, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) As proposer. Timjer (talk) 13:54, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) I kinda prefer the yellow/gold visor, but w/e.--Xilinoc (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

BG9
I was pleasantly surprised that everyone's favorite totally-maybe-robot got such a good shot so early in the anime, but here we are. Focus and detail (plus the proper torso coloring) vs. brightness.--Xilinoc (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) I'm willing to overlook the darkness of this in favor of the chapter 640 spread-accurate yellow torso and higher/focus.--Xilinoc (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) What Xil said. Timjer (talk) 20:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Äs Nödt
I remember ol' Äs's profile image getting some heated debate back in the day because people were split on whether to show him from the front or side (to highlight the mask spikes)...so here's one for each crowd.--Xilinoc (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) Proposal 1 for showing his full head and being fairly close to/higher quality than the pic we're using now, though I do wish we had a brighter alternative...--Xilinoc (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Robert Accutrone
Commissioner Gordon finally debuts with his revised, Sōken-like mustache and his full head in frame.--Xilinoc (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) But of course!--Xilinoc (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Kinda wish it was a bit brighter, but good enough. Timjer (talk) 20:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Byakuya Kuchiki (2003)
This is the odd one of the bunch - I noticed that Byakuya had a good frontal shot during his Bankai activation, AND that our current image for his post-timeskip/2003 look is at night and sorta zoomed out. If you can excuse the blades in the background, I think it's a bit more on-model for him and a solid improvement overall.--Xilinoc (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) As proposer.--Xilinoc (talk) 20:10, 1 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) The blades in the background can be a bit distracting, but overall the quality and lighting is much better. Timjer (talk) 20:37, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

New wiki background and possible logo changes
I was playing around with some of the Burn the Witch assets I found and made some new wiki background concepts. I made a background, a "header banner" and a new logo. Do you guys like any of the new concepts?

-- 16:11, August 24, 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) Been wanting a new header banner for a while now but the editor kept glitching so I never got to fool around with it - your proposal looks great. Same with the new logo and background, as much as I love the final arc and as much as our current logo has grown on me, right now it's BTW time (I'd be open to bringing back this BG when the anime starts airing again, though, then maybe capping it all off with a "dual banner" of Ichigo/Rukia/Noel/Ninny after it's all said and done).--Xilinoc (talk) 16:29, August 24, 2020 (UTC)

Yeah I’m open for a “dual background” and I would have done one, but there isn’t any key art for the anime yet, so I think this will do fine for the moment. -- 16:37, August 24, 2020 (UTC)

Support the wordmark and banner, but not the background. Its time for a change I think, but it should be the characters and it should include proper Bleach characters first and foremost. While its only right that BtW be acknowledged since its the only new content right now, it shouldnt supersede the original which is 95%+ of what the wiki is about. 09:12, August 25, 2020 (UTC)


 * Agree with Yyp. I support the wordmark and banner as well. While I admit the proposed background looks awesome, it kinda detracts from the fact that this wiki is still primarily about Bleach, not its spinoff. Timjer (talk) 09:23, August 25, 2020 (UTC)


 * Fair points, both of you. I'll try making a background to satisfy all parties later, but for now I say move ahead with the logo and background.--Xilinoc (talk) 11:50, August 25, 2020 (UTC)

I can refine the logo a bit (I was doing it on the fly) and move on using the header if all parties agree.-- 20:33, August 25, 2020 (UTC)

I created another logo concept -- 20:08, August 26, 2020 (UTC)

Managed to add the banner pic. Took a surprising amount of cropping, resizing to get it positioned right. Im sure itll surprise nobody that it doesnt show up on the Discussion page... 14:02, October 15, 2020 (UTC)