User talk:Tinni

Re: Patrick espada
Will do. -- Yyp  (Talk)  12:06, December 29, 2009 (UTC)


 * No sure that I was all that nice, but I spelled out what he did wrong & pointed him at the manual of style. -- Yyp  (Talk)  12:27, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

Committee Page
I went ahead and made sub-sections for the nominations. I grouped them together based on my opinion of which I supported, opposed, and was neutral. I was wondering. Does Mohrpheus get a say about them? He is a Member, but he is just a seated member. Minato (Talk)  14:43, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

OK. I was just wondering. I'll give him a message about this then. Minato (Talk)  14:54, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Protection
Done. Thanks for reminding me. Arrancar109 (Talk)  05:03, December 31, 2009 (UTC)

Translation
Hey Yea i understand your meaning on that but if people don't get it then i challenge them to come up with a translation that is more justifiable. There is no doubt that the work adam does is thorough and he has helped multiple times. If someone wants to challenge it let them prove there skills cause i doubt most on here will rival his. Im personally not gonna give anyone a lesson in sanskrit or buddhist history/mythology you can feel free to do so if you feel like going out of your way. Im just so tired i having to explain to people who just aren't informed enough to even complain cause they don't have a idea about what they're talkin about. Salubri (Talk)

Kanji
I was thinking about something and figured it'd be best to bring it up now. Should I start including the Kanji of the characters names with there english names in the appearance section? We do in the powers and ability section and since there is a redirect to the characters in the summary it seems a tad redundant to just have their english spelled names in the section. Minato (Talk)  17:43, December 31, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Bankai translation (Sajin Komamura Talk page)
Hopefully the mix of English and Indic-derived words in the translation of Kokujou Tengen Myouou will not prove too confounding to users. This is, of course, part of the delicacy of translation itself. I proffered "Vidyaraja of Kalasutra's Heavenly Punishment" because I felt that a more extremely-literal translation such as "black-cord heavenly-punishment enlightened-king" would obscure the fact that the terms translated "enlightened king" and "black cord" are actually themselves translations of Buddhist terms, thus also omitting the richer nuance and depth that these Buddhist terms provide. After all, if someone "translates" rounin (frequently romanized ronin) as "wandering samurai," this too is a mix of English and Japanese(-borrowed English) words, but affords the user little trouble, I hope.

I've seen in some pages the "links with text" which provide links to Wikipedia pages on certain terms within Wikia articles. Perhaps this could provide the solution to any confusion: so-linking the words "vidyaraja" and "Kalasutra" to their Wiki articles. Either that, or maybe a quick sentence or two on Komamura's article, the "Bankai" section, itself.

Let me know what you think, and of course pass this suggestion along to others as you deem necessary. Thank you. Adam Restling 00:33, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Happy New Year
Wishing You a Happy New Year. Salubri (Talk)  05:15, January 1, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Thanks for bringing that to my attention i have fixed it all. While in the course of deliberating between whether the votes were following the rules me and Yyp came across a weird occurrence. Besides two users all the other users who voted for aizen never edited on the site and all seemingly joined the day of just to vote for him. Meanwhile all normal users voted in mass of hisagi and in much smaller numbers tosen. It looked a little weird especially when some essentially said the same thing over again. Yyp found it odd too and thus the votes are suspect at best. Seeing as she tried to contact one and never got a response or anything but it seems to be expected. Salubri (Talk)  08:30, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

...
look at the Ichi-Bya fight and u'll see the original getsuga tensho used in bankai -.- --Ice Kitsune 10:40, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

could you at LEAST mention the normal Getsuga attack that was used?--Ice Kitsune 10:52, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

yea but I'd have to find that ep on the internet -.- --Ice Kitsune 10:55, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

how do I reference?--Ice Kitsune 11:10, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Problem with the feature article picture
I've replaced it. I have to track down the other pages its on before I delete it, but won't take to long. -- Yyp  (Talk)  12:44, January 2, 2010 (UTC)


 * Weird, but it was still insisting that it was in use even after I removed it from the pages, even though the pages it said it was being used on clearly show your version. I got rid of it, but let me know if an image disappears & I'll restore it until I can figure out what's wrong. -- Yyp  (Talk)  12:51, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

Character Appearance
On alot of the Chapter pages, the area where its lists characters in order of appearance are left blank. Would it be a problem if I went through the chapters and listed them--Shiraha Manjitomoe 06:07, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Databooks & Omakes
Just wanted to say good work with the databook & omake pages. I saw your message on one of the databooks page about adding things to them. I'm not sure if there is anything else that can be added to them that is worthwhile. You seem to have everything covered. -- Yyp  (Talk)  12:09, January 3, 2010 (UTC)


 * Just checked and Ju-Ni have a raw of VIBES. No translation, but it's better than nothing. I'm downloading it now. If there are any good things, I might do a table showing sample content like you did for the others. -- Yyp  (Talk)  14:11, January 3, 2010 (UTC)

Committee Box
Hey Tinni, just wanted to say that I really like the committee box you made, but there appears to be something really wrong with the picture alignment. It might just be a problem with the browser I'm using, but I just wanted to check and see whether or not it was a problem others were having. Mohrpheus 18:26, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

Lol, turns out that it was just a problem with my browser after all - I was on a different computer. Thanks for the help though, I don't see any problems with how it looks now. Mohrpheus 23:26, January 5, 2010 (UTC)

Timeline
Hey im sure your familiar with the timeline page on the site well seeing as your the only one to seem to determine the current time passage in the series i was wondering if you can put something like a table or something together for me possibly discerning what month or period that the current arcs and or battles are taken place in. This will also be helpful in the regard of accurately determining the age of the human characters. There seems to be some unknown concept as to what age ichigo is 16 or 17 though i could have swore seeing really early in the manga him being 17. Salubri (Talk)  07:10, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Nominations
Whoops. I already contacted Serial. Also, I have Tom and Gold doing summaries as part of the initiation. I asked Yyp what should I do in regards to Nwang, i.e should I ask him to do a couple of Summaries, but I think Yyp missed the message. Anyway, Salubri said he was going to discuss these four on the Admin Talkpage, so I'll let u guys decide what to do with them. Minato (Talk)  13:55, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Difference between SOULs and Bootleg
It's cool. I'm actually going to make it my business to go around the articles and changing them anyway. I meant to do it awhile ago, but some other projects came up, especially reorganizing and referencing Shūsuke Amagai's page. I'll likely try to do it later today. Arrancar109 (Talk)  14:34, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Committee Nominations
Well, we voted on KiranTheBoi before you proposed the screening. He has two oppose & one neutral (plus the opposition from you guys), so I think we can call that a "no". About GODKING_OF_ICE_CERBERUS_WERE-GARURUMON, we were concerned about the amount of time he would be able to dedicate to the committee due to his admin duties elsewhere, but no firm decision was reached. Animeluvr seems to have fallen off our radar. The general consensus at the time was that s/he did not have enough edits to judge him/her fairly and no real substantial edits of the kind that would be expected from a committee member and s/he isn't on as often as we would like (though who knows, a simple request there might fix that), so we were considering putting him/her up for the initiation too to see if he/she was up to it. (S)he would still need to go through that before being approved I think. I'll bring those two (Garurumon & Animeluvr) up and see if we can get a firm decision. Either way, the other 4 (Nwang2011, Gold3263301, Tomservo101, and SerialSniper14) would be considered ahead of them. About those 4, I support all 4 of them (had been neutral on a couple, but having seen their recent edits, I support them now). I see Salubri has posted his support on the admin page too. We'll see what Arrancar109 & Twocents think. I'm not sure about Twocents though. I don't know when she'll be back, and I don't know how long we can defer a decision for. It has been quite a while now for some of the applicants & I'm sure they're wondering what's taking so long. -- Yyp  (Talk)  15:18, January 6, 2010 (UTC)