Bleach Wiki:Featured Article

Here you can vote for a high quality article to be featured on the Main Page. The deadline is midnight (UTC) at end of 29th June, 2012.

Rules

 * Any unsigned vote will be REMOVED before vote counting.
 * Vote for article quality instead (i.e. it is informative, referenced properly, up to date, well organized etc).
 * Please do not vote for a character ONLY because he/she is recently featured, because they are a favourite of yours or because a character has revealed their Bankai or backstory when another option has not. Voting for an article obviously flawed and claiming it is better than one that doesn't suffer the same issue is not a valid vote, that is voting for your more preferred character.
 * Please, wait for six months before re-adding an already featured article to the list. Characters that have been featured once in a year should not be featured again in that same year.
 * Feel free to add characters we forgot to add, but consider that they MUST have been recently featured in the anime or manga.
 * For further details, please check the Voting Policy.

Votes
How to vote:


 * Vote by typing either of the following in the relevant sections:

Only one "Support" vote per user.

The "Oppose" option is to be used only to highlight issues with a candidate.

See the Voting Policy for more rules and guidelines on voting.

Byakuya Kuchiki

 * 1) I support Byakuya because I feel he's the most up to date article. --Legato Bluesummers (talk) 11:32, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * 2) Byakuya has has a high quality article and you can barely spot anything wrong or any errors.--
 * 3) Has featured strongly in recent chapters and an amazing article!!

Rōjūrō Ōtoribashi

 * 1) I'll cast my vote for Rose, a well referenced, detailed article with all the workings of a good article--

Äs Nödt

 * 1)  I support Äs Nödt due to it being the most detailed article of the Vandenreich's characters. It's new information, has not been featured before and has additional room to grow.   11:48, June 29, 2012 (UTC)

Deleted Votes
Any vote that is deemed invalid is moved here. Reasons why a vote may not be considered valid are set out in the Voting Policy.


 * 1)  I am in favour of Äs Nödt because it has an extremely detailed article . It is a fairly new article and is completely up to date, it also has fully detailed references and is well organised. Snootymatt (talk) 16:45, June 29, 2012 (UTC)
 * User does not meet criteria to vote as set out in the Voting Policy (has not been actively contributing to the Wiki's articles this month).

Previously Featured Articles
(Bleach Wiki:Featured Article/Archive)