User talk:Black60dragon

The Hell Verse
Hi. First off, don't edit war with the mods/admins - we don't always provide edit summaries when undoing/reverting things, but that alone isn't grounds to try and override us, since we're doing so to maintain site quality instead of just for shits and giggles. If you want to contest an undo/revert, please bring it up on the talk page instead. Secondly, of all the movies, this is the one that Kubo ultimately had the least say in overall - if you scroll down to the Trivia tab of the Movie Notes section, you'll see that Kubo actually put out a notice saying that Pierrot and Shueshia drastically changed the content of the movie and the setting of Hell from what he'd originally envisioned, basically without telling him ahead of time, such that he all but disowned the adaptation itself and would eventually do his own version of Hell starting with the one-shot release last year. That notice we keep at the top of the page is to inform readers that the events of the movie aren't canon to the manga storyline (and Hell Verse most definitely doesn't fit anywhere in the chronology, even/especially with the tie-in chapter), not that Kubo had absolutely no involvement whatsoever since he almost always contributes designs or something. I hope that clears things up.--Xilinoc (talk) 02:20, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Hi. First off, it wasn't edit warring it just looked like someone was blindly reverting without explanation something I felt was incorrect (based on how the notice was written stating Kubo had no ivolvement, which isn't true or so I thought) and mods/admins don't look any different in edit summaries. Secondly, maybe you should? I will admit from what you have told me I was mistaken about his involvement and the intention of the notice, but also had you simply explained that in the edit summary I would have never tried adding it back. I run a few Wikis of my own and as a mod/admin I always try to explain why I am overruling or reverting things. Not that I'm trying to tell you what to do, but that is something I would make an effort about unless it's just obvious straight vandalism, like no edit summary needed just rollback all their edits. Hope you understand where I'm coming from as well, it just avoids these kind of controntations right from the start, rather than creating a misunderstanding :) Black  Dragon  17:57, 15 February 2022 (UTC)


 * Sure, I could do that; alternatively/additionally, you could exercise some critical thinking when editing on a wiki for the first time and realize that pages are structured/presented the way they are after proper discussion and consensus. It's one thing if you were going in and correcting a typo we'd all overlooked, but notice/warning templates stating that a piece of media isn't considered canon by the wiki to the author's storyline aren't thrown up willy-nilly on just any old page because we feel like it - there's a reason the movie content template is uniform across all movie-related articles, including the character and setting ones, and not just on Bleach: Fade to Black. If you disagree with that decision, you're more than welcome to start a conversation on a talk page, but edit warring is universally frowned upon across all wikis (and you should know only mods/admins/crats can rollback edits, as Sun did, instead of simply undoing them, which should be its own indicator). Bottom line is, we're under no obligation to put in 100% of the work for interactions like these, and it doesn't excuse you not doing 5 minutes of research before firing back. Please don't continue that way of thinking here.--Xilinoc (talk) 07:05, 17 February 2022 (UTC)