User talk:Weedefinition/Archive 1

Welcome
Hi, welcome to Bleach Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Hanatarō Yamada page.

Here's a wiki tip for you -- you can sign your name on talk/discussion pages by typing ~ which automatically adds your signature and the date.

Check out Help:Contents for more tricks. Also, remember that a wiki is a community, and that you'll almost always find someone to help you if you're having problems. Don't hesitate to ask for help! ;)

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Arrancar109 (Talk) 01:02, 26 July 2009

Chads line
That quote is acually in epsode 5, don't know if that will help or not but just letting you know.Icedeath 04:48, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Aizen-injury trivia
Well, I'm not sure if it's all the necessary. Granted, it's true, since nobody got any closer than Urahara did, but if someone does succeed, I don't see the point of keeping it any longer, nor do I see the point of adding "someone finally injured Aizen" in the trivia section as well. Heck, for all we know, by the end of the series, everyone's gonna have an Aizen-bashing fest. My point is, stating that trivia and then modifying it chapter-by-chapter can get really tidious. I mean, I'll put it back up if you feel it is necessary, but I don't want to see it anywhere once someone else does better. Arrancar109 20:55, October 13, 2009 (UTC)

Nemu
Despite the fact that it has been noted under her strength what she can do which allowed her to excavate szayel's lab in the hueco mundo arc of the manga a while ago. It is neither necessary nor warranted that you put up a fan based ability when its simply a mixture of her strength and speed being used together.Salubri 20:51, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Im not sure what other scene your referring too but if its anime only its not to be placed into the article, especially seeing that if you read the guidelines for the side Bleach Wiki:About. if it can't be referenced it will be deleted, while Nemu's page hasn't been fully referenced yet, that needs to be cited and if its something your recently seeing then the bigger issue is your apparently only watching the anime and not reading the manga (which must be the case since you dont know what is occurring the actual storyline written by kubo himself in the manga, as you didn't seem to know what scene i was referring too), then you should also know that the manga is primary source here not the anime which is only secondary source if it follows what is done in the manga. Salubri 21:58, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

To be honest with you I wouldn't bother because there is most likely gonna be a change in how we deal with information for filler on the site. Until that change takes place i would hold off but feel free to do so once the situation is properly handled. Though just so your aware that information wont be placed on the article but a linked page to that article once everything is handled.Salubri 22:37, October 22, 2009 (UTC)

Anime Summary Project
Hi there. This is Minato and I just wanted to say thanks for helping with the Summaries. I was wondering if u would be interested with the Bleach Wiki:Anime Summary Project. BollyW, Tomservo101 and Johnnylightning have signed up. Well either way, thanks for helping. The 4th Hokage 18:13, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

That is perfectly fine. Sorry, I wasn't really asking for a commitment. The page is just a way of coordinating events. At any rate thanks and good luck with school. The 4th Hokage 18:33, November 18, 2009 (UTC)

Firstly, thank u so much for doing the Charatcers in order of appearence. Now that page is close to finished. In regrads to being more thorough. That is actually not a good thing and being too thorough is breaking rule 2 of the Summary Page Article Guidelines. Do not worry about what u did and again thank u. The 4th Hokage 00:28, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

First up, I apologize for misleading u. After reading what u had I only needed to change the beginning, in rule with the 5th Guideline. When I left the first message I just noticed that the article had been lengthened and much of it changed. After reading it I didn't see any immediate grammar edits, but I will later read it very thoroughly. About the unknown Kido. I thought that the tech she used was Kido and that particular move is not listed anywhere on her Userpage, So I technically didn't know what it was and just assumed(which was my fault) it was an unknown Kido. Again sorry for the mislead and thanks, the page has for now been listed as finished. :) The 4th Hokage 01:03, November 19, 2009 (UTC)

Volume Summaries
Hey weede, its me Minato again. I liked that u helped me with my project, but unfortunately, I am now alittle overstaffed. However, the Volume Summary Project is in need of some help. So when u have a little time on u'or hands it would be great to help with the Manga Summaries. Thank U. Minato88 02:21, November 20, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Individual volume navigation template
There are no black boxes in that template for me (and I assume most others, since it would have been mentioned by others and changed before now). I just checked the code used and there is no code used for black in there. It might be an issue unique to you, but I'll see if anyone responds to your post on its talk page. -- Yyp  (Talk)  09:36, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome (though I didn't actually do anything). -- Yyp  (Talk)  13:34, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

Edits
I created the project to eventually get rid the arrancar saga page we have which is to long and cumbersome as well as riddled with fan based words. In any case i have asked everyone trying to edit them to not do so until i can determine the format and layout that the pages will use. Not to mention people have a tendency of putting information down without properly referencing them. Seeing as people seem to not fully know this i have locked all the pages in relation to the fights and will reopen them when a layout/format has been determined. Salubri (Talk)  15:43, December 26, 2009 (UTC)

Well there's no point now, don't worry about it for the moment we might use the information there when the situation is worked out. Salubri (Talk)  17:07, December 26, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Fat Ghost
Your welcome. I thought they were two separate injuries, which is why I added separately, but you are correct, it does seem to be just the one. Thanks for bringing his page up to date. -- Yyp  (Talk)  20:32, December 26, 2009 (UTC)

Re: List of hollows issues.
I'll post a response on the Talk:List of Hollows page. The Hollow that Kon helped kill is actually on that page (labelled as Millipede-like Hollow).-- Yyp  (Talk)  18:49, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

Re:Omake Characters
No worries. I need to find those eps, if u can tell me which they r that be great. I am assuming u have seen them in the new arc. I have too many eps to look over, summaries to proofread, and other corrections to be made, links to be corrected, and more. Tho thank u for helping. The Omake Section is for mentioning and linking that stuff and the new Omake Page under episodes(where the link should go)is the place to mention in detail what happened and who was involved. Minato (Talk)  17:04, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Actually, I made a mistake. Its the other way around. The link should be provided on the Omake Page with a brief description and it should be described in detail on the ep. Minato (Talk)  17:10, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Ah thank u. Minato  (Talk)  19:44, January 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Ganju's gang pics & List of Hollow
I'll have a look later on. Thanks. Also, I'm not sure if you saw my response on the Talk:List of Hollows, but you can add those if you want. -- Yyp  (Talk)  13:33, January 7, 2010 (UTC)

Seriously?
I find this very amusing coming from you. Especially given your posts are far more insulting then my use of the word hell in the context of a common expression. "What the hell" is a common expression or would you have preferred it if I had abbreviated to WTH? Seriously, if you want to talk insulting, try reading back some of your own remarks. You do not spare other peoples feelings, in fact, from what I have seen of your posts, you are completely oblivious to other peoples feelings. Just on that Orihime's talk page you will find a stunning specimen of one of your posts that insults both our intelligence and our work ethic. If your posts render me angry, it is because of your poor choice of wording in almost every remark that you make. Even your apologies contain more back-handed insults and a marked lack of comprehension of what you did wrong. Thus rending any apology meaningless. So let me return to you some of your own words. You can feel free to be offended if you want. My conscience is clear because I never meant to insult you. I for one actually mean it because I truly didn't think anyone took offence at "what the hell". Tinni  (Talk)  09:47, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

No the problem with your posts is that you have absolutely no comprehension of how you come across. No reasonable person in the world would interpret what you wrote as a truce. In addition, if you use phrases like "Are you sure the decision to leave it at that doesn't come from former neglect and latter laziness?" and "The trivia sections became an eyesore because you let it slip and sat on it for a long time until it was a complete mess, and when you finally decided to do something about it you over reacted so severely that you wiped out a lot of the most interesting trivia (eye of the beholder territory, I admit)." it's insulting. In short, when you use the phase you, expect people to take things personally because guess what, you are attacking them personally. However, since you clearly do not get it. There is no point is expanding any more energy on the matter. Tinni  (Talk)  11:19, January 11, 2010 (UTC)

Image Policy
Hi Weedefinition. Just wanted to remind you that as set out in our Image Policy, you need to add and  templates to any images you upload. I have added them to the image of Tosen. It is easy for anyone to add them to images from new episodes/chapters, but for pictures from the older ones, it can be very hard to figure out what episode/chapter they are from, so it is best if the person who added the image does it, as they know where it came from. Thanks and let me or an admin or Committee member know if you have any questions. -- Yyp (Talk) 12:16, January 16, 2010 (UTC)


 * You can fill them in either while uploading the image or by editing the image's page after uploading it. On the upload screen, there is a drop down menu with a list of options for the . However, there is no option for adding the . You have to add it yourself in the summary section. If you are adding them after uploading, you can add the rationale wherever you want, so long as it is on the page. -- Yyp (Talk) 13:00, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

No, it was my mistake. I checked it shortly after it was uploaded to see if it was added to any pages (which it hadn't been at the time) and decided to leave it for an hour. Then I checked again, but for some reason it still said that it was not being used on any page. As soon as I saved it, I noticed that it was in fact in use (hence me undoing the delete notice straight away). My browser must have loaded a cached version of it when opened the page the second time. -- Yyp (Talk) 19:08, January 22, 2010 (UTC)

Question about Glitch
Hey. I've noticed a problem recently with kanji being replaced by this symbol:. It happened again when you edited Kon's page earlier. It has happened too often now & I want to report it to central wiki, but I need to clarify something first (it's info I'll need to give so they can replicate the problem in order to fix it). When you edited Kon's article today, where you using the Rich Text Editor and what browser were you using? Also, did anything unusual happen during that edit? -- Yyp (Talk) 11:45, January 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * I haven't seen anything about the "mass of meaningless text" issue, but I guess people just abandon the edit when they come across that rather than saving it. I haven't used the RTE for several months due to its problems and finding it easier to just use the source code to edit. Do you have the RTE disabled in your preferences, or do you just switch to the source mode when the edit window opened? -- Yyp (Talk) 12:32, January 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * Well, if it only happens with the library computers then it is likely an issue with them. Perhaps they are an old version of IE that is not fully compatible with the new version of the RTE. In my experience, with the exception of issues with templates, most glitches occur as soon as the RTE is opened. Changing to source mode after that does not stop them, as they've already appeared. Which is why I stopped using the RTE. Unless central is able to fix these things, the only thing you can do is use the show changes button underneath the edit summary box to check for glitches like the kanji one before saving. -- Yyp (Talk) 12:52, January 25, 2010 (UTC)


 * Just checked with central again, and they have updated the software to solve some issues with non-English characters, so the kanji should be fine now (hopefully). -- Yyp (Talk) 19:52, January 25, 2010 (UTC)

Feature Article
Hi. In regards to your vote on the Featured Article of the Month, please note that reasons must be about the article and its merits (what makes it worth featuring/more worthy than the others). Your vote does not make mention of the article. Please ensure that any replacement vote discusses the article. -- Yyp (Talk) 09:50, January 28, 2010 (UTC)


 * I know, but we have had to be extremely strict to cut out the nonsense that has plagued the votes (and is seems to be working for the most part). It is supposed to be a feature for the articles, rather than a popularity contest for the characters after all. And yeah, it is 99.99999999999999999999999% certain Aizen will win it, and todays chapter only makes it more likely (its out on mangastream's site). -- Yyp (Talk) 10:16, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

As said above, reasons stated in a vote must be about the article. Please update your vote to reflect this. Bleach Wiki:Featured Article. -- Yyp (Talk) 11:05, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Response to your reply
(Sigh) I can take a hint.

I still find it annoying though.

Until next time...

Anon e Mouse Jr. Anon e Mouse Jr. 15:54, January 28, 2010 (UTC)

Edits
I didn't make the status section to place in long details of whats happening. Simply Active, Incapacitated, Injured, or Deceased are what are to be used nothing more. Salubri (Talk)  03:04, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Well this is the second time Im asking that you stop. Salubri (Talk)  03:07, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Not currently. Salubri (Talk)  03:12, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Actually you may have had the right idea but there are things that shouldn't be so specific. If a character is alive and not engaged in anything Active is fine. If they are engaged in battle then saying they are fighting a particular opponent is fine. If they have been taken out of the battle due to injury then Incapacitated is fine. Salubri (Talk)  03:25, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Yet where is he in the two most recent chapters. Seeing as everyone else is accounted for. Salubri (Talk)  06:04, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

As of two chapters everyone is accounted for except him. He is to be listed as Active until he is actually seen engaging in fighting. Everyone else was. We aren't saying the same of anyone else in the area not fighting. He may have moved to fight in that chapter but he isn't apparently. Not my choice Kubo's. Salubri (Talk)  06:55, February 7, 2010 (UTC)

Well thats a toss up we know she is treating Hiyori but there are alot of injured people, do we know she is getting to anyone else. So thats questionable what to put there but treating Hiyori is enough for now. So when it comes to fighting its fighting (name) when not shown engaged in combat active is fine. when healing its healing (name) and incapacitated for all others taken out of combat and deceased simply for those dead. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  01:25, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

ASP Link
As you can imagine, I've gotten tired of typing "Anime Summary Project" so I've been abbreviating it ASP. So there is the link; alternatively you could type in "anime summary project" into the search box on the left and it will come right up. The standards are up on section 3.1. I checked on that that link and yes, in my previous edit I got keyboard-happy and typed an extra [] on each side. But either way, thanks for contributing. SerialSniper14 (Talk)  07:42, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Re: List of Techniques
We already have a Techniques page, so perhaps it would be better to expand that than creating a new page (if there's anything missing off of it). -- Yyp (Talk) 16:31, February 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * I don't think we need something listing all the Zanpakuto techniques. That's covered quite well on the individual character pages and there are already category lists for them anyway: Overall techniques list, Zanpakutō techniques list & Resurrección techniques list, so I don't see the benefit of that. But for the rest, you can add them as sub-points under the existing headings (as below). -- Yyp (Talk) 17:05, February 21, 2010 (UTC)


 * Zanjutsu
 * Nadegiri
 * Hakuda
 * Hohō
 * Shunpo
 * Senka
 * Utsusemi
 * Kidō
 * Shunko

Discussion copied to Forum:List of Techniques. -- Yyp (Talk) 20:22, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

Ruling
They should remain separated because, even though the Arrancar also carry Zanpakutou, they don't function quite the same as a Shinigami's. So while the "Zanpakutou released:" section distinguishes the release between Shikai and Bankai, Resurrecion doesn't quite fit in there as a higher or lower level of release, as it is a different release all together. So by that logic, it should be distinguished by having a category to itself. SerialSniper14 (Talk)  05:23, February 26, 2010 (UTC)

I'm back
Hey Weede. I'm finally back. Yyp told me u have been helping with the Anime summaries and I wanted to thank u for that. I have seen ur question/proposal on the Anime Project page. I haven't answered that yet, but I will just as soon as I can. Minato (Talk)  00:32, March 24, 2010 (UTC)

Re: What about the fight pages?
Umm im surprised you didn't know the fights project has been going on since january 23. The Ryoka Invasion is already completed and we are currently working on the Arrancar Invasion. The main page can be found here Bleach Wiki:Fight Summary Project.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  00:58, March 26, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Last name basis
It certainly is not desirable, and in this case not acceptable either. My rule is always use the first name for those that share their surname with other characters (like the Kurosakis, Ishidas, Inoues, Kuchikis, Shibas, Kotetsus etc). For the rest, I don't really mind, but the first name seems to be used the majority of the time for most other characters. I sometimes alternate between their first and second names and their title when I have to repeat their name several times close together, but other than that, it's probably best to stick to the one name. There's no need for anyone to go around changing the names (bar mistakes/romanization issues). -- Yyp (Talk) 09:58, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Ichigo vs. Renji & Byakuya
The issue would be that its not currently attached to anything, there's no references for it and no pictures. We will most likely be back tracking to the beginning arc at which time we can handle the situation better. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  21:32, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

See you did some work on the fight. The main reason we skipped over the arc is because I couldn't think of a accurate and appropriate name to address the overall arc within the realm of the bleach universe. Ryoka Invasion, Arrancar Invasion, Invasion of Hueco Mundo, Zanpakuto Rebellion where in contrast easier. Would you happen to know what could be used as a name, the sooner we have one the sooner it can be put up for work.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  16:41, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Oh ok, well if you come up with anything let me know. Also thanks for helping out on the fights. I know they can tiring and frustrating to work on and most people don't have the skill or patience for the work so it appreciated. I know you had some confusion or issue with what we are trying to do with them. So if you have any questions just let me know. Also if all else fails try checking out completed fights and events they will show you the general format. I try and and check them all for completion so nominally they are up to what the point is if they have passed completion. In case you didn't know its not necessary to put down direct quoted conversation just observed conversation is fine. The other thing I would like to do completion on the hitsugaya vs luppi fight but i have run into an issue of the pics. There aren't any that i can find featuring the fight between the two. If you come across some that would help thanks. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  17:17, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Idk there's alot defense of Karakura town that doesn't seem to mesh with the start of the series. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  01:35, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Sorry about the mess
No worries. Yyp (Talk) 13:00, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Found you on imdb

ok then...
Who am i and no you wee always curteous Crimsonterminator1000 22:03, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

well done i guer i need to make my names more ambiguous Crimsonterminator1000 22:18, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Tōshirō vs Luppi Edits
To: Weedefinition

Ah, not a problem. I do appreciate the feedback. In any case...In regards to your question on writing all the fights in a play-by-play format. I would think so. The 'battle' section on Fight Pages should probably be done that way as should the 'prologue' and 'aftermath' sections. Since "we have largely done away with even trying to act like the information that we put down on the site is anywhere near being summaries and have decided to basically go full on with the articles. The fights are not only about the fights but the storyline in some ways." Although, I think that there can be some leeway if you find yourself summarizing a bit. I hope that is a suitable answer to your question. ^_^ - Mr. N 13:52, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Ichigo Kurosaki vs. Grimmjow Jaegerjaquez
Best case is that it should be given an average afterwards section and i guess i can put together a new page for that information your trying to put down as well as the information on Hitsugaya vs. luppi's aftermath section. That should deal with all the stuff that happens during Orihime's kidnapping and after. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  22:53, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Well there you go the page Good Bye Halcyon Days should work for your needs.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  23:59, April 6, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Article for Orihime's abduction
That...is difficult for me to say. I cannot really say that an article for Orihime's abuction is so much a fight as it is a plot point/plot article. I sort-of see where you are trying to go...but I do not think that it counts. I am also looking at the Anime Summary Project's definition for a fight (as I have seen talk of putting in fight sections for the Anime Summary articles) and an article on Orihime's abuction does not match very well. Of course, if you still think that there should be such a page, put up the topic on the Discussion section of the Fight Summary Project page. I hope that answers your question! - Mr. N 00:10, April 7, 2010 (UTC)


 * Never mind. Looks like you had Salubri take care of it. Sorry for the "late" response! - Mr. N 00:12, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Late Response
Hah hah. I understand. And I do admit that my responses are a bit slower (not only do I work sort-of "slow" but I have to take care of my academic assignments first as they are a higher priority so that takes up my time). ^_^ - Mr. N 00:35, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Kirikaze
I guess so. Its a named character with more than just one or two lines about him, so there should be enough to justify having an article about him.-- Yyp (Talk) 13:19, April 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re:The reiryoku/reiatsu thing
6min30 into the episode, Kazeshini states that Kirikaze absorbs Reiryoku. Difficult to tell, but in the same conversation I think Hōzikamru also says Reiryoku, but since that's so hard to tell, I'll put that aside. Both terms are used during the episode to describe the ability. Yyp (Talk) 12:36, April 8, 2010 (UTC)


 * It is a bit confusing because Zabimaru does say reiatsu later on in the episode when mentioning his ability, but Kazeshini definitely says reiryoku at the start, even though the subtitle says reiatsu. And I'm sure Hōzikamru says reiryoku too, though the subtitle says strength instead. Don't worry about the summary. It takes as long as it takes. I've done plenty of them myself and I know they can be a pain to do at times. I still have to update half the characters' plot sections about this episode. -- Yyp (Talk) 13:45, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Images
It's fine if it's only for your user page/blog. As for licensing info, I guess you would use the tag and for the rationale, credit the creator of the image and say it is based on Bleach by Kubo Tite. Help:Image copyright tags. Yyp (Talk) 07:47, April 10, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Gin Question
In Bleach Official Bootleg, it says that Rangiku and Gin joined the Academy about the same time. We can assume that they didn't graduate together as Gin only took one year to complete the Academy and no one has said Rangiku managed an equal feat. But they were in the academy together for that one year that Gin was in the Academy. I guess we can assume that Hitsugaya (he made the comment just before he and Gin fought actually) has no idea of Gin's and Rangiku's past together and thinks they are friends because they were in the Academy together as classmates. Not that before Gin and Rangiku joined the Academy, they were already friends, with Gin having saved Rangiku and living with her. So no, Gin and Rangiku met before they joined the Academy and both were just little kids in Rokungai. They joined the Academy together but Gin graduated early. So the sequence of events is Gin saves Rangiku by giving her food -> Gin and Rangiku move in together -> Gin and Rangiku join the Academy together -> Gin graduates and becomes 3rd Seat of the 5th Division -> Sometimes later Rangiku graduates and joins the Gotei 13. Hope that answers your question. Tinni  (Talk)  03:36, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Featured Article
Saw your post on Salubri's talk page. I've made the changes. TomServo101 19:22, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Not sure; you'd have to ask an admin how long it was before they accepted me to the P&S (and by default gave me rollback) after I applied. As for the template, yes anyone can edit it; the main page is locked, but the templates are not (done same thing on the episode summaries a few times). TomServo101 07:09, April 15, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Move
Well, yes, I did originally move it back, but I decided the move may be better after all. But since Salubri took charge of the fight project itself, he's probably the better one to ask at the moment, since the fight project in general has a lot of incomplete articles, and he's been working to start each article and sometimes improve some of them. Ask him about it, and if he approves, we can end up moving it back to Uryū Ishida vs. Cirucci Sanderwicci. Afterwards, since I made noise about it last time, if anyone wants to move it, they will have to discuss it first.

And yes, I've been touchy about this for awhile. When a user moved Muramasa's page without discussing it first, I was really angry about it, as if any article is moved, then any articles that link to it have to be modified as well, so they link to the correct page/have the correct content.

Anyway, I've ranted too much. So yeah, ask Salubri first, since he's the one in charge of the project, and if he approves, then we can do the move. <font color="teal" size="2px">Arrancar109 <font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)  07:46, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

I listed them as being there but they did nothing in that fight and it wasn't essentially about them. As you said of the issue with why it can't change I agree and there is a issue of space a relevance in the fight. They didn't use any attacks that we can even issue. Those who don't use actual attacks or use very little should only be listed once. I also don't particular care for work I put alot of time and thought into being summarily disregarded. The original way is fine. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  14:36, April 19, 2010 (UTC)

A Few Things
Hey Weede. Srry for not replying sooner. I haven't been on much. Anyway, I am still considering ur stuff for the project and I'm sure I want to use some of it, or at the very least tweak the format. I am going to bring it up on the Summary page under discussions and try and get some others to reply. Serial hasn't been on much either. I guess everybody's busy right now.

Aside from that. I've noticed ur talkpage has gotten long. So I figured I'd give u the instructions on how to archive. Link. If u have any questions, u can ask me. Minato (Talk)  01:00, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Ichigo v Ganju fight page
It was more of a scuffle then an actual fight. It should be entered under early stages before intruderz on the Ryoka Invasion page. If you could throw some of that in there and and them meeting Ganju's sister then that would be good.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  14:14, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Possible copyright infringement
No problem on my end. Yyp (Talk) 10:52, April 24, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Overlapping Content
It should be fine the overall arc page such as Arrancar Invasion is to provide a overview of the entire arc. In no way does it remotely contain the amount of informational detail as actual pages so it should be fine. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  14:15, May 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Scaring away good editors...
Didn't mean to insult foreigners. As for me being scared away... I came over from narutopedia after working on their templates to try to help here... and first edit i make a redirect to a duplicate template, i am reverted and told i did something wrong by an administrator. I followed his instructions... and I was ignored on the talkpage. - S im A nt 15:57, May 13, 2010 (UTC)

Just wondering...
Well, I was just thinking about it and, what was exactly wrong with my ediy? I mean, I know that the translated manga translated both Shibari and Hiasobi like a gerund, but I thought that were not just "slaves" about what says the translators. And we have a precedent with ALL the others commands being imperatives. But well, I dont want to start an editing war, so that's why I'm talking this now. Thx for your attention--Kind-Hearted-One 15:04, June 2, 2010 (UTC)

Re:List battles in character pages?
I'm not sure exactly how Salubri plans to integrate the fights with the character articles (or if they are going to be). Best ask him. Yyp (Talk) 13:14, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

Possibly I'll look into making templates for that sort of thing. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  13:36, June 3, 2010 (UTC)

About the Picture
Hey it's perfectly fine man, you can use it how you like. I made it myself and had to do some editing so they didn't overlap each other. I was debating to make them back to back but I actually like the way it looks now. Anyways, you're free to use it as you want =D TVthePunisher 15:54, June 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re:End of the Fake Karakura arc?
We'll have to see how it goes. It might stay in the current setting for a while or move to Yammy. Hard to decide on it right now. Yyp (Talk) 12:13, June 5, 2010 (UTC)

Reference Corner
I dont know. For some of things you mentioned they were either mentioned in passing or implied or stated from experience. They are easily referenced you just have to find them and reference them being stated. As for a reference corner I would have to know more about what it would be about. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  17:23, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

We have a reference corner. It's called the Bleach Wiki:Article Improvement Project. Tinni  (Talk)  17:26, June 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Redirects
No, no, it's mostly me being childish and sticking it to people who have something against redirects. On a more seriously note, I don't want editors thinking that they can't use perfectly legitimate redirects and also I don't see the point of doing the | thing when it is unnecessary. You can do whatever you feel like on the whole to use | or not the use the | issue. We don't have a policy governing it. Tinni  (Talk)  11:54, June 30, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Rollback request
Sorry, that should never have been allowed to happen. Even though I have a say in it if it is put up for voting, I can't actually grant you rights as I'm not a bureaucrat, just an admin (Salubri & Arrancar109 can), but if I remember correctly, it was decided that we would only give rollback rights to members of the policy & standards committee (its been a while since anyone has asked, so I'm not certain on this - maybe someone can confirm this?). If you wish to apply to be a member of the committee, you can post on the Bleach Wiki:Policy & Standards Committee's page, under the "Membership nominations" heading. Yyp (Talk) 13:41, July 1, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Committee Membership
Just to give you a quick update on your nomination for committee membership, after the current members discussed your nomination, I decided to forward you to the admins for consideration. Tinni  (Talk)  04:10, July 4, 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations
As affirmed by the other Admin they agree with the nomination. You therefore have been made a lieutenant on the wiki and therefore now possess rollback rights (side note: please dont abuse it, otherwise an admin will come down on your head with a wrath and take it away). Also you are now hold a Seat on the Bleach Wiki:Policy & Standards Committee also reached through the community sidebar or just community page. Familiarize yourself with the additions on there as well as the Bleach Wiki:Policy and corresponding policies if you haven't already. so discussions are easier and have more room they can be had on the discussion page of the Policy & Standards Committee. Congrats.--<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  17:21, July 5, 2010 (UTC)

Congrats and Archiving
Well, congrats on ur promotion Weede. I was going to support, but they moved into the next step before I could, but hey u r apart of the family now. U r now a Lieutenant on Bleach Wikia and u can now display the on ur userpage if u want. Just reminding u that Rollback rights r for undoing vandalism, threatening comments, spoilers, or anything inappropriate. If it doesn't fit in these categories, then the undo feature is what should be used. Also, please remember to regularly check the Committee Talkpage for updates and conversations with the rest of the Committee.

On another note, as a full-time member, u will probably need the Archive feature in the future. Instructions can be found here and if u have any questions about Archiving, about the Committee, or anything, feel free to ask me or another Committee member. Minato (Talk)  18:50, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Engetsu
hey i made a change to the Zanpakutō page and i belive that Kurosaki isshin´s Zanpakutōshoud be under Melee-Type Zanpakutō´s becouse he has the same attacks as Ichigo...

We can also speculate that Isshin´s bankai shoud be named Tensa Engetsu...

That is okay i will do that next time :-) Slowmotion91 23:13, July 6, 2010 (UTC)

Archiving
Hey I noticed you did your archive wrong. You archived it under the name WD and not Weedefinition. Just letting you know--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  01:59, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm, I dont know. That might be the best option. I still haven't gotten the the hang of archiving either (as made apparent by my long talk page I have yet to archive again)--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  02:09, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Key event missing
Huh...That is interesting. I am not sure if the execution itself warrants a page to itself but it might because Ichigo does (very) briefly fight against 3 lieutenants before going to fight Byakuya. And if it is not able to get its own page then it probably should be part of another event/fight. I do agree with you that there should be some organizing of the previous/concurrent/next business in the fight and event pages. We really have not done that since our main objectives have been getting the pages finished first. I will see about discussing this with Salubri. Also, about that talk link next to my name in the project page that goes to Salubri's talk page? I did not know that. I must have accidentally made an error when I was helping make the project page. Thanks for bringing it up!


 * Oh, and congratulations on becoming a committee member. - Mr. N 06:02, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Okay. I am not sure if you saw but I did leave a message with Salubri as well. To the best of my knowledge, it looks to be alright (he did tell me that "I suppose it can be addressed"). So, I think that the event page for Rukia's Execution will be created. I am not sure who will make the page, though. It probably will be Salubri (since Salubri did set up all the previous Fight pages). However, it might be me who creates the page (or even you because you had proposed the idea). However, I am not exactly sure if I have the authority (or ability) to make the page. Anyway, the point being is that an Event page for Rukia's Execution will most likely be made. ^.^ - Mr. N 23:29, July 8, 2010 (UTC)



Re: Grammar Corner
Yeah, I suppose I am the manager as it was created because of something I had started doing. Anyway, the change looks good. How would you like me to inform you when an article you put up is finished?--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  16:32, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

All right, Thank you--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  18:31, July 7, 2010 (UTC)

Manga Summaries
About the manga summaries, I prefer it that you did not write the summaries until you have a couple of translations available. Preferably, it is best to wait until Cnet and/or Ju-ni comes out with their translation. Which is what I do personally. The reason for this is that Mangastream is not the most accurate translator out there and often, someone else has to go in and correct the summaries if it is written based on Mangastream scanlation. The summary you wrote last week was corrected by Yyp, as you can see from the diff. I don't know if this weeks summary will need correction based on Cnet or Ju-ni releases but as there is no tearing hurry to write the summaries, it is best to wait for the more reputable scans. Tinni  (Talk)  11:04, July 8, 2010 (UTC)

Image Policy
The Image Policy has changed and has new guidelines please read and become familiar with them as they now determine how pics and gifs will be handled on the site from now on. It is also important that you help others follow them. thank you.--<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  11:44, July 9, 2010 (UTC)

Make sure you follow the policy on uploaded pics as far as what to do with them. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  17:06, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

I know i mean where to submit them for entrance into the image galleries. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  17:15, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

No side by side (gallery format in the bleach image galley talk page.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  17:35, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

Yes it is all official images and gifs are to be submitted for the galleries if not they will not be considered official on the site. Ill go make that a bit more clear on the policy page.

Check the image policy again i think you may have been confused on the deletion point hopefully i made it clear.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  14:02, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Named Hollows
Yes we should have the articles but it is a matter of creating them. Plus we can't just throw together an ugly, unstructured page, now when we have a backlog of ugly, unstructured page from before the site had rules imposed about article quality. So if you are volunteering to put the pages together, great! Just remember to follow the proper formatting. Dead_Girl is a good one to follow for a minor character with a handful of appearances. Also, don't forget to reduce the amount of text on List of hollow page as it appropriate. Fishbone D specially has too much text. Tinni  (Talk)  23:58, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

PS. You might also want to remember to add the trivia point that their names were only revealed in Bleach SOULs databook and don't forget the references. Tinni  (Talk)  23:58, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

PSS. Thanks for volunteering! Tinni  (Talk)  23:58, July 10, 2010 (UTC)

That's fine. Just add as a place-holder and I'll go through replacing them with the proper reference later. Tinni  (Talk)  00:35, July 11, 2010 (UTC)

It doesn't seem to be necessary as the SOULs referenced needed to be added for when the name was revealed but you seemed to have found a manga reference for the name. I totally forgot about chapter 13, page 11. So only Numb Chandalier and Bulbous G will need the SOULs reference for their name. Anyway, good job so far. The article looks great! Tinni  (Talk)  01:30, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

STOP! Don't do anything like that. Start a discussion on the articles talk page explaining what you have found and ask for better suggestions for name changes for the hollow first. We can sort out the Jubilini article for a earth-bound hollow after we find a proper name for that character article. Tinni  (Talk)  15:01, July 18, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Don Kanonji
Yeah, I took it to Adam and he said both are right. I just haven't gotten around to fixing it up yet as I have been working alot. I'll have it done by tuesday night sorry.--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  03:46, July 12, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Under Construction box
Just use the box. That'll categories the page and put a notice that its not done yet. Tinni  (Talk)  02:11, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

Well it's a wiki so they should be able to add to it if they want to. It's not good to get too possessive and refer to things as "my article". If someone does add the article in a constructive way, following the rules of the Manual of Styles, it is best to be grateful for the assistance. Tinni  (Talk)  09:05, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of pics
When you put up pics for deletion you state there are better quality pics and therefore the ones you put up should be deleted. Well i need to know where these better quality ones are because they aren't connected with the same name as the previous one and that means they aren't already cataloged in the image gallery. If the ones you want deleted are removed then there is a open spot on articles where the pic used exist. So you need to make sure the name is the same as the old pic otherwise its more work to find and replace the images elsewhere.--<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  18:59, July 13, 2010 (UTC)

OK im confused because looking at both of them the older one has better resolution then the one you put up so why would i delete that. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  02:15, July 14, 2010 (UTC)

Project Articles
Sorry for the delay. My work schedule has been quite insane as of late. Anyway, three of the current project articles are now done and I will do the others later today--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  16:02, July 15, 2010 (UTC)

Nnoitra's last name
Well you know how this works send it to adam and see what he says. Ask him about it also post it on the translation page. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  18:20, July 21, 2010 (UTC)

Resignation
Hey Weede I am resigning from the Committee. I left a msg here explaining. See u latr. Minato (Talk)  16:17, July 23, 2010 (UTC)

Hey, with Minato  resigning with now have an empty fukutaicho spot. I have started a new discussion on the talk page on this matter and am open to input. Just to be clear on the duties of the fukutaicho, in the past Minato has been the one recruiting for the committee. He was also in charge of the Anime Summary project - which at the time was one of only two of our projects. He also communicated more regularly then me with the other members to address issues they might be having and to help them follow committee and wiki policies. So, in the past, it's primarily been a people position. However, the new fukutachio can redefine the position to their own taste and within reason. Tinni  (Talk)  03:14, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Catagories
Im not sure what you mean you just put or whatever you want and then save the page. Go down to the bottom of the page click on the word now there and give a description of the category. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  23:10, July 24, 2010 (UTC)

Page Move
Better question is why are committee members that are not involved in the fight project dictating how the layout or workings of the project go. Nwang apparently had no part in this and i knew nothing of it either. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  23:42, July 27, 2010 (UTC)

Its an open debate that only three people where aware of. Also its a fight article so it is about a fight, be it naming or otherwise. Something like that needs to be brought up to the people in charge. I dont make the articles just so they can be ignored or set aside. Nwang or myself should have been the one to address the issue. We don't intercede on the projects of others hence why they have leaders. Being on the committee doesnt override that. If something was decided as the bases of the article improvement project then that should have been fine as both morpheous and Tinni are leaders of that page. But whene its under the review of another project that project leaders have to be along with it as well. Just because it was a "open" discussion doesn't mean its written in stone, seeing as key people that should have been in the conversation where left out. Projects are to work together if they have interconnected goals but P&S committee members are supposed to comply with the policy. It should have never been just talked between you three, you should have addressed on the fight projects page and it would have been handled accordingly and not told to those involved in the project after the fact. Thats like determining something about Grammar for the whole sight and not involving the grammar corner, its counter productive and undermining. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  00:17, July 28, 2010 (UTC)

Alright then. I saw your conversation with <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri as well as that debate in regards to the Demi-Hollow character. Yes, it is a little "late" but I am glad that you have informed me anyway. You probably should have included myself or <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px"> in the dicussion but what is done is done. Well, I suppose you can go ahead and move the page. And thank you. I hope that I do okay being Fukutaicho.- Mr. N 23:20, July 29, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Locked Pages
Well I locked the main ones Soifon, Shunusi, Vizard, lisa and Izuru's pages for the time being the others are small and due for official change the established pages i named minus the vizard one and lisa article are up undisputed in this. The other ones im not overly concerned about but as for right now revert any edits to the current article pages as well there is not to be any separate pages for the new characters as stated in the masked project. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  03:12, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you :)
Yea but of course all the Bleach stuff I want comes a week or to after my b-day...oh well! Thanks again hopefully I can have a new chapter to read on my b-day. --Lemursrule (talk) 03:27, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Forum move
Your forum post on 77 arrancar has been moved to Forum:Official Arrancar Discussions. 11:01, August 3, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Fights, Battles & Events
Thanks! Hopefully the page will help people keep the Bleach timeline straight. Tinni  (Talk)  04:47, August 6, 2010 (UTC)

Profile Pics
That actually isn't local to Shintaro(or at least I think not). I have been having trouble seeing all images on this site for the past two days. Sometimes they are there sometimes not. Im glad to know this is not just me--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  03:57, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

According to Ten Tailed Fox the problem is with all images and is across all Wikia--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  04:14, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I encountered the problem with it a few days ago and thought my computer was crapping out on me, but it is a wikia bug. Not all images are buggy, but most of them are for me and some other users. Once they install new servers in Germany (I think that's the place they said on the staff blog) then things should improve back to their original state.  <font #800080">~ <font color="#800080">~ <font color="#008000">Ten <font color="#000080">Tailed <font color="#808000">Fox   <span style="cursor:help;" title="Go to Ten Tailed Fox ' s Talk Page." data-rte-attribs=" style=cursor:help; title=Go to Ten Tailed Fox's Talk Page."><font color="#800080">&lt; <font color="#800080">t <font color="#800080">al <font color="#800080">k <font color="#800080">&gt; 04:17, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Yup, its a wiki wide problem which they are working to fix. We've been quite lucky with it only affecting a small number of pictures so far, but other wikis have apparently been suffering much more from it. Wikia is aware of it and (I think) is working on it, though as usual they could do a much better PR job with it. I have no idea what the cause is, but you can still view the image by clicking on it or going to the picture's page and clicking on it there. 10:56, August 9, 2010 (UTC)

Location Plot sections?
I have to bring this up to you cause Tinni brought it up to me and I agree with her. Im not sure where the notion that we were doing plot sections for locations came from but that by and large makes no sense seeing as the locations aren't characters. We list what we know of the locations and any changes that may occur to the location or anything of note and properly reference it. There is no real reason to make plot sections for them, especially considering the work that has to be done on various articles on the site as it is. --<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  21:59, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

Well she apparently had no idea about it and as for whats supposed to be there nothing more then direct information about the location. There doesn't need to be a long drawn plot by plot outline otherwise that needless editing. Its like explaining everything that happened at a football stadium, far to much information and not relevant. The information on what is important would either be its history, its features and any changes to it. Other then that a explanation of whatever significant thing that may have happened there more then a sentence long is far to much. THe Shinō Academy and Seireitei pages are good the way they are. The other locations should follow similar, in other words if they are given a paragraph of information thats fine if thats all they have. Locations we dont do plot sections or anything similar. Also its not really her fault if no one gives support or a go ahead then you need to take it someone directly, theres alot on the improvements page. That seems like a lack of communication again.--<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  22:43, August 17, 2010 (UTC)

I put the location article in the project list because the plot section was empty. I don't agree with location articles having plot sections but it is not for me to unilaterally decide that they aren't worth doing. However, since the consensus is that location articles don't need plot section. and you were the one who, apparently, unilaterally decided to add the plot section to the location pages, you are now tasked with going through the location pages removing them. Tinni  (Talk)  03:57, August 18, 2010 (UTC)


 * Never mind, I did it myself. I did also miss your original discussion topic on the Article Improvement page, my apologies. For future reference, if you don't get any response, it be to draw attention to the topic before acting upon it. As it happened, I didn't see the discussion but when conducting a review of the location pages, saw the empty headings and so added the articles in the list of articles for improvement because they were clearly incomplete and needed help. That doesn't, however, mean that I agree with the proposed addition. As I said, its not my place to unilaterally decide that something isn't doing. Location articles are fairly inconsistent in how they are treated and I am open to suggestion on how to improvement them but plot section isn't way to go I don't think. Tinni   (Talk)  04:17, August 18, 2010 (UTC)

Grammer Corner
Hey WeeDefinition, this is PrinceNero. I recently joined the wiki, and have signed up to work on the grammar corner. Are there any particular articles you would like me to start with, or should I just pick a couple off the list on the project page? PrinceNero (talk) 18:17, September 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Cast and Crew articles
I am not against the idea per say. It's just that we have so many articles that are labelled "needs help" or "stubs" and so many other articles that lack formatting and referencing that I worry that the cast and crew articles, which wouldn't necessarily be of interest to 90% of our readership, would just be a bunch of articles that never get maintained and which are largely clones of the wikipedia articles. I think a better solution is to link to wikipedia for cast and crews. We can easily do that by using the link formatting: Masakazu Morita, which would just show-up as Masakazu Morita on the page. That way, we give our readers a place to go to research the voice actors, directors etc. At the same time, we don't have to deal with the upkeep of the articles. Anyway, that's what I think. There is a old discussion on the forums on this topic: Forum:Voice Actors, you might want to revive that and get other peoples opinion. However, given that no one responded to your own Forum:List of characters by seiyū topic and Forum:Shouldn't we start doing "real world" articles? got very little interest, I do think that there is very little interest as a whole on this topic and a link of wikipedia is sufficent. Tinni  (Talk)  04:57, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

I think the best way to do this is to link the voice actors in the character boxes to wikipedia. I myself know almost nothing about the people who create bleach other than Kubo and frankly I don't care and I have always gotten the sense that this is how most of the others on the site feel. I would suggest making a blog post about it to get everyone's opinion but like Tinni said I think there will be low interest--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  05:05, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

Templates
Why are you changing the parameters of the zanpakuto spirit template. --<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  16:25, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Coding is delicate work, hence why im usually the only one on site that knows how to really do it. Might wanna undo it because even with what you add it wont show up in the box. Also it makes the box bigger and they already take enough space up. Also infobox for dolls doesn't seem justifiable. Zanpakuto spirits have a box but only zangetsu, hyorinmaru and zabimaru have it. The dolls idk they dont seem to warrant that plus those articles are being worked on slowly and there is no room in the powers and abilities section on a bounts page for the box. I dont know that there is a reason for while they talk and have personalities to them they still have less credability then an arrancar's zanpakuto who dont talk or have personalities at all. Idk thats a tuff one.--<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  16:41, September 15, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Missing Voice Actors
Sure, go ahead. Tinni  (Talk)  15:38, September 22, 2010 (UTC)

Forum
Hey Weede, Salurbi would like all members of the committee to vote on Forum:Should we use a Bot for large Scale Edits?. It is quite important--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  18:31, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Congrats
Haha, Thanks man--<font color="black" face="Verdana">God <font color="black" face="Verdana">(Pray)  20:47, September 25, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Shattered Shaft
The dates are July 21st to July 31st and the references is Bleach Official Character Book Souls, Page 261-264. Tinni  (Talk)  04:30, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Discussion on Wikia's New Look
Hi. I was hoping that you could take a look at User blog:Yyp/New Wikia Skin:What we can expect? and give some feedback when you have a chance. I'd like to gather as much input & thoughts on this change as possible so that I can present it to wikia (if you don't want something passed on to them, its not a problem). It would be great if you could post on your general impressions or specific things that you like/dislike or any suggestions etc. Thanks for your input, 11:46, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

Thats no problem. Thanks. 18:37, September 26, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Chain of Fate
The chain of fate issue is as such. There would have to be a interchangeable reason for this. I dont want the wiki to be in the practice of changing things because they have a japanese form to them. Chain of fate is what its known as and what would be looked up. This wiki is an english based changing everything to the japanese form isn't necessary for every thing. If there is precedent for name changing then has to be more then theres a japanese version. --<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  22:51, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

I would suggest checking those discussions, I had nothing to do with those changes and I dont know that any admin did either, but they were before a discussion was had on the necessity of changing names. Though I do know that Oken was printed a few times in the manga so thats fine as far as the others Im not sure. --<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  23:34, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Central 46 emblem
Chapter 168, page 1 (and good work on the page and the (quite a lot of) stuff you've been doing lately). Thanks, 20:47, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Page redit
Yea thats good thanks for fixing it.--<font color="00A693" size="2px">Salubri <font color="FFFFFF" size="2px">(Talk)  20:54, November 25, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
I remember when I got promoted that you said I deserved it more than you. Well right now you definitely deserve it more than me. You have been doing some great work lately and I just wanted to say keep it up. --<font color="#660066" face="Verdana">God <font color="#660066" face="Verdana">(Pray)  22:36, November 27, 2010 (UTC)

Re:Episode 299
Sorry about that lol. Anyway, I can't even do episode 299 right now because my computer keeps freezing on me for some reason. So yeah, you can do it, just hope no one else beats it to you again. TheDevilHand888 (talk) 04:43, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Quick question
Add to the end of their post. The code is in the toolbox underneath the edit window, so you can just click on that rather than typing it out. 23:07, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Revert Spree
I had a quick look, there doesn't appear to be any more out-of-universe language but probably best to have a closer look. As for the inactive label, I'll leave it up for one more week. After that I have a two week break for the holidays and so I'll take it down then. Following the holidays I should be settled in enough in my new setting to be able to start contributing to the wiki properly. Tinni  (Talk)  12:07, December 10, 2010 (UTC)

Pic Issue
Im not sure why its doin that but i would suggest not clicking directly on the pic. instead click the icon in the bottom right of the thumb. In the gallaries you click the pic then the icon in the right corner.--<font color="00A86B" size="2px">Salubri <font color="00A86B" size="2px">(Talk)  05:14, December 17, 2010 (UTC)

Zangetsu
Hey, it was decided a few months ago that Zangetsu's page would include his manga appearances. So where that user posted that question was fine--<font color="#660066" face="Verdana">God <font color="#660066" face="Verdana">(Pray)  00:14, December 22, 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas
I wanted to wish you a Merry Christmas. --<font color="00A86B" size="2px">Salubri <font color="00A86B" size="2px">(Talk)  18:28, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Just wanted to wish you a happy and safe "Bleach-tastic" Christmas. --Lemursrule (talk) 18:48, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas! I hope you have a wonderful holiday! <font color="teal" size="2px">Arrancar109 <font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)  19:15, December 25, 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas! Hope you are having a great holiday! Tinni  (Talk)  00:28, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

Merry Christmas man--<font color="#660066" face="Verdana">God <font color="#660066" face="Verdana">(Pray)  03:27, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

Thank you and Merry Christmas to you too! And a happy new year too! Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  05:06, December 26, 2010 (UTC)