Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-36952851-20180918223113/@comment-5171765-20180919110234

I dont know where you coming from with all this but youve reached some strange conclusions that are flawed. I think your taking a lot of things as proof of something when they are not proof at all, lack of proof of something that is implied as being proof of the oposite. I'm not going to disect every point you wrote cause its more time than I have to write this but I'll pick a couple of them.

One I can understand where you got it from is that Toshiro is not the reincarnation of any shinigami. That is not canon. It was made up by the anime not Tite Kubo (the actual author of Bleach).

Yoruichi not using her Zanpakuto does not in any way back up your conclusion. Yoruichi having become a captain proves she does have one and that she achieved Bankai with it. That is completely unjustified for you to say.

Ginjo may not have been shown with his Zanpakuto but that doesnt mean he didnt have one, just that we didnt see it. That could be because his Fullbring was what he needed to use for the ruse they had going and then it all went a bit mad at the end with Tite not writing it as well as he should have, what with the Bankai coming out of nowhere and all. Its not clear if that was supposed to be somehow Ichigo's latent powers or if Ginjo had it already.

Using Ichigo as the basis for any discussion on zanpakuto is not the best way to make a point. Ichigo (and Kenpachi) are exceptions to just about every rule Tite ever came up with for various reasons.