User talk:Jirachiwish

Archive 1

Re:Archiving
Yes, once you archive the messages, you can delete them off your regular talk page. To put a link just type User Talk:Jirarcihiwish/Archive 1 --

Quick comments on your Zanpakutō Rebellion fight edts
Hi, Jirachiwish I just wanted to make a quick comment, having been checking your Zanpakutō Rebellion fight edits. Perhaps, it is just me but it seems that a fair number of your sentences are possibly too long? I do notice that many of your sentences are very long as you frequently use many commas. I think that your sentences might risk being run-on sentences. It is just an observation that I made. I know that I often can put too much detail into my edits instead of being concise. Just thought I would mention that. ---Mr. N 04:28, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Re: Byakuya's Betrayal:Revealed
Hmm. I see. Well, here is what I think: Stopping at when Byakuya enters the Zanpakutō cave is a point that could be fine. But I believe that since Byakuya's "betrayal" is one of the key points in the Zanpakutō Rebellion arc, it might be best to summarize (if not simply mention) Renji Abarai & Zabimaru vs. Byakuya Kuchiki & Senbonzakura and Byakuya Kuchiki vs. Sode no Shirayuki and Renji Abarai & Zabimaru vs. Byakuya Kuchiki & Senbonzakura. You certainly could mention in the Aftermath that some of the results of Byakuya's "betrayal" were those two battles. Doing that would work since this event is somewhat of a precursor to those battles. Take a look at other Event pages (as I believe that I did something similar with The Armies Assemble: Battle at Fake Karakura Town) ---Mr. N  05:19, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Okay. I have made my check. Things seems to be in order (I might point out that my earlier feedback comment can apply to Byakuya's Betrayal: Revealed). I think that the section New Revelation, Dissension within the Kuchiki Clan! works quite well. As for the category titles, I had no issue with them. Sometimes, one has to improvise a bit to suit the article's events (especially if there are no manga chapter titles to use). "New Revelation, Dissension within the Kuchiki Clan!" might be changed to something like "New Revelation, Dissension within the Gotei 13" since you could make it applicable to the Gotei 13 as a whole (if you decided to do that). All in all, it is fine. ---Mr. N 02:23, May 9, 2011 (UTC)

Re: gif making
I've never made a .gif before, so I can't really help there. But Tinni posted a guide to making them in one of her blogs. She seems to be on here only very occasionally right now, so I don't know when she'll be able to get back to you on that. 10:42, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

Hey, saw your message. Sorry it took me so long to respond. I am actually currently overseas on work. Anyway, I see Yyp has already linked you to the guide I made awhile back. I also dug-up some other guides for you here is one and here is another. Let me know if you have any more question. Tinni  (Talk)  20:33, May 10, 2011 (UTC)

RE: Fight Images
Ok, I added images from that episode, also tweeaked the text so the images fit without so many blanked spaces!! Done!! SunXia  (Chat)  12:33, May 8, 2011 (UTC)

fight edit
Suffice to say I was unsure of using the "Turning point" in the fight summary. The vast amount of info you placed should be in other articles. --Salubri (Talk)  16:21, May 12, 2011 (UTC)

Well as you pointed out making the page is what you did on your own so how can you ascribe something being wrong with what I did when you jumped into it to quickly, thus the issue. My point being if you had payed attention to any of the other articles you would know you went into portions of there information. So its not about whether the info was correct but if it was all in the right place. The end defining the summary would be determined by the information that supposed to be on the other articles. Also I had already changed the article by removing the info and placing it in the proper articles. I was just informing you so that it was clear, but seeing as you brought it up If there are no standards for the work being done then whats the point of doing it, that should go without saying. --Salubri (Talk)  02:17, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

Well if you choose not to edit here thats your choice. As I said I was informing you of the situation. Whether you consider that constructive or an issue is up to you. --Salubri (Talk)  03:44, May 13, 2011 (UTC)

You are very capable though you have problems with some of the details but noting that would deter the work you do. If you weren't capable I would simply state that from the beginning. So overall your work is fine besides that. --Salubri (Talk)  06:25, May 13, 2011 (UTC)