User talk:Boredfan1

Welcome
Welcome to Bleach Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the New Portraits for the Femritter page, and thanks for joining our community! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.


 * Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help.


 * Questions? You can ask on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!


 * Need help? You can find it right here! You can also find a full list of help pages here.


 * Don't know what to do? The Community Portal has an outline of the site, and has links to pages to get you started! Also check out THIS BLOG for helpful information to help you understand the wiki and where you can start if you are interested in contributing here.


 * Here are some more pages you might find useful:


 * Policy - follow this to ensure harmony on the wiki
 * Manual of Style - a guide to how articles here are organized and written
 * Spoiler Policy - follow this to not ruin upcoming stories for those yet to read or watch the new chapter or episode


 * Sign your name in discussions by typing ~ , which automatically adds your signature and the date, so we know who's talking!

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! Arrancar109 (talk) 00:28, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

"Soifon"
Seeing as SunXia keeps deleting what I say, I won't leave the response on that thread

If the "claim" you're referring to is the Hepburn romanization of "Sui-Feng" as "Soifon", you only need to look at this image here. You can see in the lower right corner after "SUI-FENG" is "砕蜂" (the Chinese hanzi/Japanese kanji) and then after that is a tiny "ソイフォン", which are the Japanese katakana that read "Soifon" in Hepburn romanization. All I attempted to do was add the katakana spelling ソイフォン and the Hepburn romaji to the page (as well as to another Chinese name on the page). All I have been trying to say for apparently 4 years is that the page should say "" with a footnote pointing out one is Pinyin and the other is Hepburn romanization. Maybe it should even be formatted with Ruby because you can do that now and it shows up as 砕蜂ソイフォン. Because right now, Suì-Fēng's page is the only page on this entire Wiki that does not have the furigana/katakana spelling and Hepburn romaji of that spelling of the name despite the fact that every single Arrancar/Espada, Fullbringer, and Quincy-related term which is written in kanji with furigana/katakana spellings has the Hepburn romanization provided. Espada has it. Fullbringer has it. Blut Vene has it (or wherever that redirects to). But Suì-Fēng does not. I feel it has to do with the fact that the mods don't want to ever acknowledge the bad fan translation of "Soifon" again.— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 11:41, May 29, 2015 (UTC)

I also tried to point out Ichibē Hyōsube has the wrong title because Japanese doesn't use the ē in native Japanese words outside of "お姉さん" which is "onēsan", and because the e-e sound in the character's name is split across two kanji such that it's read 一いち兵べ衛え (Ichi-be-e).— Ryulong ( 琉竜 ) 11:44, May 29, 2015 (UTC)

User Issue
As an admin here I would point out that we have strict rules and guidelines that we follow here. They have kept this wiki from vandalism and erroneous content for years. Having said that we make it very clear on multiple fronts whats not allowed and we have plenty of users that seem to be able to follow the rules without issue or complaining about what other wiki will allow. I can't speak for other wikis, all that I know is how we do things here. In the case of the issue that you interjected into the user in question isnt a new user and has been here for some time and even then he was doing as he pleased with no regard to any rules. SunXia pointed out to him in this instance what he was doing wrong there was nothing arbitrary about her points. If theres a translation issue you place it on translation page and let it be handled by the translators from there. He in fact decided to dictate it what it should be regardless of input on that he moved pages and changed content. Then preceded to edit war more then once. The general fact that he isnt already banned is proof of giving him the benefit of the doubt but in fact your not helping any with the what i do on my wiki and this is what you should do interjections.--


 * I have no idea why you keep getting involved but here, see that thread, it was already closed there was no need to continue this. This is Edit Warring. This is Edit Warring. This is Edit Warring. This is Edit Warring. You may not like it, or consider it valid, but Edit Warring is against the rules, especially when its with members of the team. I was well within my duties as a Moderator to list him for blocking. And this is not the first time he was doing blockable offenses. So yes, stressing to him that he follows the rules is also valid. He has a final chance which is much more than fair given his attitude and actions. We consider the issue closed, you should too although, really, our rules are our rules, so when someone is listed for blocking, which happens after a warning(s) is given, it is not up for debate. We had a private discussion on the issue and it was closed.


 * One incident of rule violating is more than necessary for a block. But here as you can see he's not known for his peaceful attitude here, for years. Now stop getting stressed out over something that relates to the members of the team here and their duties.

RE: Edit
Hi Boredfan1. Let's calm down a second, which edit are you referring to?? If you are referring to this edit and subsequent edits after well first of all, you removed referenced information which is a...violation of policies here. You also removed the brief introduction for what an Arrancar is. This is the style we prefer to use on our Wiki, a brief introduction and then the bulk of the information in the Overview section below. Now you may think this looks amateurish but this is an opinion and its one we disagree with. Now its ok that you feel this way but you changed the style of an article without consultation and that is why it was reverted. Let's not blow an edit out of proportion, we all manage our Wikis in different ways and you edit conflicted with the consistency of our Manual of Style. Hope this helps.

I've read the rules and I didn't see that anywhere in there......though I do admit that I removed the brief introduction because not only was that introduction not helpful but it is basically repeating what should be in the overview below. If it is somewhere I missed, please link it. I'll go back over the article and figure out a suitable introduction but in all honestly, I don't really see the point since like I said, it says a lot of what is in the rest of the article though for some things it is useful. As for what I meant by amateurish, I mean the layout of most of the articles are quite awful, not the sections structures but what is in between them. It reminds me of what I use to do a few years ago and I am ashamed to ever have written articles like that, no offense meant to the writers. Even if they do conform to the rules, you have to admit, my edit generally looks much better. Also, a bit off topic, please note that when I edit pages, it's against the clock as my computer likes to randomly shut down so I have to edit multiple times to make sure nothing is lost as I rarely remember exactly what I wrote when the computer comes back and is often not as good but that'll eventually be fixed.=Lord of the bored, User:Boredfan1= 23:04, June 4, 2015 (UTC)


 * Okay we need to get one thing straight here before I continue. Every wiki is different. Each wiki has a different manual of style. Just because you and people on a wiki you are a regular on may think it looks "better" doesn't mean it is, and you don't set the rules here. What I see in your edit(s) is turning five smaller paragraphs into one large one with far less references, and turning the introduction at the top of the page into the incomplete sentence "An Arrancar". You also added in your own terms like "Pseudo Arrancar", and ended the entire (again, overly long) paragraph with the very clearly out-of-universe statement "[t]heir purpose is not explained, nor why someone is demoted to it from Espada rather than being killed and remains one of the known plot holes of the series", both of which are frowned upon by our manual of style.

Reference isn't everything and honestly, I was like I said pressed for time so I couldn't write it and find the references before the possible shutting down of my computer, causing everything I was working on to be lost. All articles are suppose to be written as paragraphs anyways, not a bunch of sentences that look more like notes than an actual explanation on the subject which is what was there before my edit and is the proper way of writing on and off Wikia regardless of what wiki it is. And I didn't go over it once it was finished because I was tired and it was late and I had just written the whole thing while moving the references that was already there and going back and forth between pages to help me make it as good as I could at the time. So if you don't like that there is few references even though I didn't delete any of the references that were already there, put the damn references in yourself! I'll fix it when I can and only when I can! As for Pseudo Arrancar, it may not be an official term but it is no different than Mock Arrancar as it means the exact same thing whether or not you wish to admit it. And as for the statements at the end of your complain, that is the utter truth and I have looked over the rules and there is absolutely nothing that I saw in there which says it is wrong. Sun herself only mentioned the introduction which I will fix so it's not a big deal. Don't make a big deal over this, I intend to fix it and everytime I fix an article I've written it's always much better than before, you just have too give me the opportunity.=Lord of the bored, User:Boredfan1= 23:40, June 4, 2015 (UTC)