User talk:Yyp



Greetings and welcome to my Talk Page. Feel free to ask me any questions here, or bring an issue to my attention. Please follow the rules set out in the User Page Policy when posting here, mainly:


 * All posts should be polite, calm and civil, even when you are in the middle of a heated discussion. No personal attacks are permitted.


 * Always sign your posts - you can do this by writing four tildes in a row ~ which will automatically leave your name and the time and date of your post.


 * Do not alter any post that is not your own.


 * Use appropriate headings to set out any new topic you wish to discuss. Add new headings to the end of the page.

Due to the unwieldy length this page can reach, posts left here will occasionally be moved to an archive. If a previous discussion you were engaged in is no longer visible on this page, then it has been archived and may be found in the link below:

Please update the Featured Picture, Featured Quote
It still shows the FP and FQ of january with Shuhei, Shuhei killing Tosen , and the quote of Komamura to Tosen. Please update !! Amagai88 08:52, February 1, 2010 (UTC)Amagai88Amagai88 08:52, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

Battle Charts
Turns out I misread what Adam said. Reiatsu and Kido are the same stat. Not Intelligence in Kido. I knew something was off when I looked at Kenpachi as we know he is not lacking in reiatsu at all. The actual version makes alot of sense at it seems to refer to reiatsu as it relates to kido not a declaration of kido level in general.Salubri (Talk)  21:42, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Unohana's combat data
It's Kidou and Reiatsu that are combined with the same stat # at the bottom of the graph: "鬼道 (Kidou)・霊圧 (Reiatsu) 100." Adam Restling 21:47, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Removing content
All right thanks. I'm going to wait on doing that for now though since I barely have anything on my talk page. Also thanks for the compliment :D TheDevilHand888 20:55, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Shukei on Reiatsu Page
What is Shukei (Read the Reiatsu article in the subsection about color. Sam B 08:02, February 7, 2010 (UTC)WhiteArmor

regarding the Kurosaki ichigo Picture
you should change it to this []

since this is the latest drawing style of ichigo...if youve noticed...they changed how he looks like 4 times now. this is the newest one from the Ichigo Vs Uliqiorra Episode the one you keep updateing is outdated...its from episode 114 thats like more than 100 episodes ago. please change it cuz its the newest style of ichigo and it just displayes the charechter as Kubo Tite Wants him to look in this Arc.

I Hope I'm Doing This Right...
Well, I changed the picture of Aizen on his page, and I'm sorry for causing any trouble, I wasn't aware of that rule, I'm quite the noob when it comes to Wiki things XD Can you forgive me?

Main Page
Ive been looking over the main page and having been thinking about making the featured boxes smaller by like half the current size. They seem to way to big and I was thinking abuut putting the box for the links to the wiki anime sites on the bottom. Also we should start a poll of some kind. Favorite zanpakuto and stuff just average polls but for the site, just something fun to do. We can put it under the manga and anime updates on the main page. Seeing as we have nothing but open space there. Salubri (Talk)  17:06, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Well we had one a long while ago but it was removed as it just no longer went with the page theme. But I can make one more in line with the site and it can go on the bottom. It will basically link to other anime/manga sites on wiki in general. Inuyasha, naruto, hellsing whatever else. Salubri (Talk)  17:18, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

Yo
Hey, it's me. Long time, no see. Listen, I was wondering if any significant changes have occurred since I was gone. My internet modem died last week and I had to get a new one, which was just delivered today. Arrancar109 (Talk)  06:21, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

User Ichimaro
I hate to butt in but I think you warned User Ichimaro in error. He actually did the right thing as he removed "File:Tanvi.jpeg|thumb|Tanvi is Karin's indian friend" that User:Toshiroichigo had added to Karin's page AFTER User:Toshiroichigo removed the contents of Karin's page. If you go back and check the history logs, you'll see that all Ichimaro did was removed that image, the adding of which should be considered vandalism and I think you should ban User:Toshiroichigo before the latter does any more damage. Anyway, sorry to butt in to official admin business, but I just hate it when people get warned for things they didn't do. Tinni  (Talk)  13:24, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

In that case, may I suggest a small change in how warnings are issued. I think it might be beneficial to give warnings the same way giving of warnings are recorded. You know, specifying the page where the violation occurred. Just a suggestion. Thanks for clearing it up, sorry again for butting in. Tinni  (Talk)  13:35, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

contact?
Hi,

can you contact me?

aksteele@gmail.com

i am trying to put together a wikia and have no idea what i am doing.

aaron

Hirokatsugoto 15:09, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Basically i am in a Second Life Bleach RP sim, and we have a big community and a wiki is exactly what we need to have people in touch with what is going on. We link to the Bleach Wiki in almost every notecard for members.

I actually would just like to pretty much copy the format of this Wiki, just erasing the canon-content and replacing it with our content. We are basically the Bleach universe but 200 years after the current storyline. We dont really have any of the same characters or anything, but the same format is in place. I know it sounds easy in my head to do this, but all the formatting and organization of confuses me. I have much content, i just need something to plug it into. I would even consider paying for help with this.

Hirokatsugoto 15:31, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Wikianswers Anime Widget
Hi Yyp,

Due to recent changes, the Wikianswers widget now sends questions to Wikianswers Anime rather Wikianswers. Can you change the following pages accordingly, so they redirect to Wikianswers Anime rather than Wikianswers:

MediaWiki:Answers widget user note Find questions about Bleach on Wikianswers Anime.

MediaWiki:Answers widget anon note Find questions about Bleach on Wikianswers Anime.

MediaWiki:Answers widget admin note Find questions about Bleach</a> on Wikianswers Anime</a>.

MediaWiki:Ask a question Ask a Bleach question

Thanks... ~ Akadirgun (userpage &#8285; talk) 17:36, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks mate... ^^ ~ Akadirgun (userpage &#8285; talk) 17:49, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Zanpakuto
Im not sure if your aware but I recently had a conversation on the zanpakuto talk page and something was brought up. The Illusions-type zanapakuto issue. We have it as a anime only category but im not sure why. The general catagories are Melee and Kido. Melee for those based on close combat ability and kido for those whose design is based around an ability. Alot can fall under the kido of course as expected. We have sub types that are more specific. Illusion is one but only has muramasa as it was stated in the anime, but as the anime policy states it doesn't conflict with what is known in manga to place aizen and shinji (currently under the general term of kido type) in the category. In fact on multiple times aizen's is said cause illusions thats what absolute hynposis is about affecting perception (mental manipulation via the senses). The same for shinji as aizen deduced it was an optical illusion. They are stated as illusion and thats the affect they make therefore thats where they should be placed. As for Izuru I thought for a while his is obviously kido. Yes it requires melee of rather physical contact but its design is undisputably built around its ability. The whole point of hitting an opponent when he fights is to weigh them down, he has stated as much he is at a disadvantage at range also the hook "raise your head" deal we have seen him use that so its obviously kido-based, until specifically classified under a sub-group. There maybe others if we think about it. But I wanted your thoughts on this. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  21:44, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

yea if the manga would just say it then it would really help or even a guide book (i wish they had another one more up to date). On the other hand the manga does portray or state it outside of saying the type directly so we have to make due i guess. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  23:41, February 10, 2010 (UTC)

Darker
Hey I notice that your on the Darker than Black wiki too. Im getting into it myself looks like theres alot of work to do there. But it would be a welcomed change from Bleach 24/7 I can juggle both. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  05:56, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks it wasn't specifically given on the anime. But I do deal well in powers and abilities and organization. I stick to my strengths. You know I did the powers and abilities on this site as well. When I first came here they were small condensed paragraphs. I also did all the major character powers and abilities sections in DC Database and Marvel Database when I used to work on the sites. If you have time check out bruce wayne, superman, wonderwoman, The authority (my absolute favorite group) or any main mutant on marvel I did all that organization and what not. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  16:24, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

Yea I don't get it myself. Some people dont appreciate anything. You try to do something beneficial and people just complain and most of the time they dont have a argument or even know why their complaining. Most people who arent even doing anything on the site they just like to complain for the sake of complaining. I mean I have no problem with a reasonable discussion but when people enter into them with no logical argument, complaining about the work because they liked the ability to add opinion over facts. Ridiculous. Hopefully you enjoy the work I did on the other sites though.<font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  17:21, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

About a breach:
You deleted an edit of mine on the "How can Aizen be defeated:" page with the message: spoiler-breach..

I've read the spoiler page and I don't see what content my edit had that it was a spoiler breach.. the chapter was already up in public so I'm allowed to comment about it or am I that wrong?

Shinzawai 17:07, February 11, 2010 (UTC)

A Few Questions
Hey Yyp you had left me a post in my page letting me know to contact you if a had any questions with the new policies and chages that occur in my absence.

A few things a would like to point out/ask about are the Chapters page, individual volumes page, and character info box. On the Chapters page the way it was originally set up was to have the picture on the left side with the chapters in the middle and the rest of the info on the right, this was to portrait the character who appears as said volume cover character first since when you open a book the first thing you see is the cover, the way it is right now is less appealing to the eye. Also it was stated that the titles of the chapters would be kept as the originally appear in weekly shonen jump as to mantain the clarity of the name of the article (Chapters) now you have a mix of orginal and revised for the takobon. and one last note one this is why are there links to a french page on the references this is a English wiki and i see no need for those french links.

On to the individual volumes having all the chapters under one page makes for those pages to be unnecesarily long not to mention that having all the info shrunk in scroll boxes makes it look very unprofessional and does not atract attention for some one to want to read the info. The navgation box also has a poor choice of colors. black on black or dark blue is not easy to read.

Lastly on the way the new character info boxes I find that there is information that is pretty much pointless to have such as marital status. In the world of Bleach nearly every character is known to not have a significant other in other words they are either single or widow, and their level of eduaction every shinigami has graduated from the academy and the rest of the protagonist are high school students again info that is redudant and not needed.

Let me know if you can help answer any of my questions. WhiteStrike(talk) 08:24, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

I did have a look at WhiteStrike's concern and I have been avoiding trying to comment because as far as I am concern, WhiteStrike's opinion comes down to personal taste. There is nothing wrong with either of those pages. Firstly, the chapter pages draw attention to most relevant part of the information, the actual list of chapters, which is what most readers are after when the click on the page. While WhiteStrike might find it more aesthetically pleasing to have the cover on the left side, it is not necessarily what the reader wants to see first. As for the volume pages, "long page" is only a problem with the content of the pages become unreadable. This is not a problem the volume pages have. In addition, there is nothing wrong with scroll boxes and while WhiteStrike might find them unprofessional, I do not and I would like to point out that no reader has ever complained about them. Moreover, having all the chapter summaries collected in the same place, is a very good thing as the reader gets all the relevant information without having to check multiple different pages the existence of which serve no real purpose but to take up space, be a maintenance nightmare and just plain annoying. I also don't see what WhiteStrike means with not attracting attention. The navigation colours I do not have problem with but might be a harder to read for some people but that's about it. I am sure these are not things WhiteStrike wants to hear but frankly I saw nothing in his comments that was anything beyond a matter of personal taste. Personal taste is a funny thing and what looks good to one person doesn't necessarily look good to someone else. What you have to ask is that are his concern something that would hamper readers? Frankly, I do not think his concerns with presentation are a concern to the readers. Moreover, I think readers would actually be disadvantaged if his suggestion for the chapter page was implemented. I am sorry WhiteStrike misses how it used to be done. But the chapter pages and the volume pages have been the way it has for month and certain were the way they are since I became active. After months of use and no complaints... well all I really have to say is that if the old style was so good, then it wouldn't have changed. I know I am coming across a bit harshly given that WhiteStrike just returned and that's why I was avoiding saying anything. Tinni  (Talk)  13:55, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

I would have to agree with Tinni on this one. As far as the other stuff, totally out of my realm for the most part. I dont normally deal with Chapters or Volumes but she does and has done so for some time I think she know what she is doing. As for the infoboxes they are a work in progress. You know full well somethings can easily be taken out and others no so much. Recently the Arrancar infoboxs where changed cause some info was unnecessary. I have yet to determine if anything should be changed on the others, they were hard to make and even harder to properly coordinate. So we'll see. <font color="4169E1" size="2px">Salubri <font color="4169E1" size="2px">(Talk)  14:47, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

I just wanted to add that with the anime summaries, they need a page of their own because the summaries are substantially longer then any given chapter summary. In addition, we have other things in the anime, like the powers and the omake. This is not the case for the chapters, which just has a summary, character in order of appearance, a cover graphic and of course episode cross links. Moreover, having the chapters collected together on the volume pages is the logical way to group them and how most fans would group them and given that chapter summaries are not as long as anime summaries, you hare to really ask, what benefit is there to have them in separate pages? More importantly, are they such that we can't do without them. Answer is, if they were on separate pages we would add pictures and maybe have things like trivia sections. Pictures on anime summaries help to break up walls of text, because those are so much longer. Pictures in volume summaries would be overkill given that most of them are not very long. Trivia only applies to some chapters and only note things like "the title changed between chapter and volume" or in the case of Harribel "her attacked changed between chapter and volume" etc, etc. They aren't really a major concern. So I am against any move to seperate the chapter summaries and give them pages of their own. Such a move simply cannot be logically justified. Tinni  (Talk)  15:11, February 12, 2010 (UTC)

Chapter 379
Mangafox titles the chapter as "No True Answer" so i was wondering if someone should put that in.Sam B 07:17, February 13, 2010 (UTC)WhiteArmor

Can you please protect Chapter 379 until April 04? That's when the next volume should comes out. There is no reason anyone would have to modify that page before then. I am getting so, so, so sick of reverting changes to that page. No one seems to read my comments on the talk page explaining why we are not going to "No True Answer". The problem is fairly pervasive and many folks in forums really, really, really believe that 379 is titled "No True Answer". So this is not a problem that's going to go away. So please for the sake of my sanity, just lock that page until April. Tinni  (Talk)  08:07, February 13, 2010 (UTC)