User talk:Yaujj75

Soul King edits
Look, I understand you mean well, but let me explain why me and Xilinoc undid your edits on the Soul King page. First of all, when Xilinoc asked you to reference your edits, he did not mean "copy paste a URL to a completely random Reddit post". That's not how we work around here. Secondly, your edits are not very necessary; they're just rewording existing lines that were already written well enough. And finally, your edits also contain some spelling and grammar errors. Hence why we prefer the older versions. Timjer (talk) 09:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Sorry, it is just that the wording can misinform people that the Soul King is destroying the world by killing the Hollows whereas it is actually Soul King stabilize the world and the five Noble Families seek to improve the stagnant world mentioned in the Reddit post. I am sorry I made a mess here. I just wish to make sure there is no misunderstanding. Yau JJ the Editor (talk) 10:09, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Actually, that is wrong. The SK did not stabilize the world by killing the Hollows, quite the opposite. To literally quote CFYOW: "However, it was not as though the stagnation of the world had been averted by the simple act of destroying the Hollows. The Reio continued in that way to protect the world that would have slowly melted into chaos." So you see, the world was already stagnant thanks to the Hollows. The SK's actions only made things worse. Timjer (talk) 11:00, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Yeah, that is the debatable part which the Reddit post argued. Perhaps the world is going to chaos but not in a immediate sense. The Five Families wanted to improve the world, not fix it although perspective to tell whether improve the world is consider a fix. Of course, the Soul King is neither improving or worsening the situation in my opinion. But I guess there are many interpretation to that quote, and I just follow one that I just read from the Reddit post. Yau JJ the Editor (talk) 11:39, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Well, I read that Reddit post by now, and I realized they have a point. While I cannot know what the OG Japanese version of the novel says exactly, I fully understand that even in official translations some of the nuances can be lost. Hence why I carefully reworded the SK article myself, to better represent what is most likely meant by the text without deviating from the translations too much. Timjer (talk) 11:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Thank you and sorry for the business. To be honest, I am not a great of an editor which I accidentally mess up the edit there. Have a nice day. Yau JJ the Editor (talk) 12:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)