Talk:Exequias

I'm seriously considering deleting the Template:Exequias, as it is of little value, imho. There is barely anything in it. Cavalaras redirects to Rudobon's page, which means the template effectively only links to Rudobon. The Exequias link at the top of it is of little use either when there are links to the Exequias page in the intro & charbox of Rudobon. Similarly, Rudobon is linked to from the Exequias page, meaning there is little (if any) point in having the navigation template. -- Yyp  (Talk)  20:48, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Merge with Rudobon?
This is a bit old, but seeing as the Exequias are essentially synonymous with Rudobon and his special ability, should the two pages just be merged? There is little information in this article, and it constantly repeats the fact that the entire group consists of Rudobon and his Calaveras. All of this article's info could be summed up in a section on Rudobon's page, and the Exequias link could just redirect to that section. Anybody else agree? Mohrpheus 19:41, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, I say go for it. This article is pretty poorly written anyway--Godisme (Talk)  19:47, April 23, 2010 (UTC)

I am in agreement with merging this page with that of Rudobon. It would put more "meat" on Rudobon's page and let's face it, Rudobon IS the Exequias as the other "soldiers" that make up the Exequias are just mindless drones under Rudobon's control. If they were individuals akin to the Faccion or something, sure! But they are not. There is no value in having a page just for them. Tinni  (Talk)  07:51, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Yup, it probably should be merged. It serves little purpose being its own article as the entire thing relates solely to Rudobon. Yyp (Talk) 11:01, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

I'm in agreements as well. Like everyone said, Rudobon IS the Exequias, so there's really no point in having the page any longer. Arrancar109 (Talk)  16:23, May 31, 2010 (UTC)

Well, since everybody seems to be in agreement, who's going to do the merge? I'd do it myself, but I really don't know how to do it smoothly (though I'd appreciate it if somebody pointed me to where I could find some instructions I probably missed). Mohrpheus 17:40, June 1, 2010 (UTC)

Most of the info is kind of relative to Rudobon, so yes, I think it can be merged/moved without any problems.

If you don't know how to merge the articles, can't you just copy and paste the bits needed over manually and we can tidy up then? Just a bit of a workaround...TomServo101 (Talk)  18:04, June 1, 2010 (UTC)