Template talk:ZanpakutōList

Update
Kyōka Suigetsu's Bankai name should say 'Not revealed' instead of 'Not yet revealed', according to Aizen's page. 08:29, January 7, 2014 (UTC)
 * Fixed.--Xilinoc (talk) 11:25, January 7, 2014 (UTC)

Coloring Fixes
There are some coloring errors I thought I'd let you know:


 * For Water-Type Zanpakuto, the first cell is colored with the hexcode #87CEEB, which is the same as the color for the Wind-Type Zanpakuto cells. It should be #0000FF.
 * For Lightning-Type Zanpakuto, only the first two cells are colored with the hexcode #035096; the rest are colored with #00755E, which is taken by Plant-Type Zanpakuto.

Hope that helps. /Antwan\ 13:03, December 5, 2014 (UTC)

Kanji correction
Can someone please correct the kanji for Sumitsukigasa and Raikū? They are incorrect as of now. Yatanogarasu (talk) 21:51, December 11, 2014 (UTC)


 * Fixed, thanks for pointing it out.--Xilinoc (talk) 23:37, December 11, 2014 (UTC)

Kenpachi's Sealed Form
Xil-san or any other person with rights to edit protected pages. We need to change a "Sealed Form" part of Kenpachi's Zanpakutō werse. Prior to obtaining name of his Sword, Kenpachi's sealed form is this "damaged" or chipped, worn-out Nodachi-variant sword which, later after slaying Unohana, thus unlocking his "sealed potential", granted him access to his Zanpakutō name and release command "Drink", that transforms said Nodachi-type sword into axe. 【I'm just... Mad | 語聞見】 10:01, December 16, 2014 (UTC)
 * Nothing in the manga has ever stated that is this his sealed form. Quite the opposite actually, Kenpachi said he was unable to seal his blade and thus it is constantly released. We have seen partially released Zanpakutō before;
 * Yumichika's blade only partially releases when he gives the wrong name and then fully releases from that state when he uses the correct name.
 * Ichigo, another person unable to seal his Zanpakutō has had a change appearance too many times.
 * Renji's Bankai has also changed from a partially released state to a fully released state upon learning the full name.


 * You may want to say that these cases were special but then why can't Kenpachi be special too since he stated himself that he is unable to seal his blade and that it is constantly released. We have seen in the manga what his blade looked like before it released and it looked nothing like the partially released Shikai that he originally presented as his Zanpakutō. Since the fact he stated he couldn't seal his blade, we know there are other cases of faux Shikai or partial Shikai/Bankai and we seen him with his original sword, we have to take those facts as they are presented to us. Refusing to do so only presents speculation "Maybe he was lying" or "Maybe he didn't know he had another Shikai" or "Maybe Kubo changed his mind". Unless the manga states that he's been able to fully seal his Zanpakutō all along and the chipped sword IS his sealed blade then we have to go by what is stated in the manga.


 * Sun is right, Staff have been over this throughly and it in fact is stated one way or another at least twice that it was a constant-release type. http://www.mangapanda.com/94-563-15/bleach/chapter-109.html, http://www.mangapanda.com/94-563-16/bleach/chapter-109.html, noting similarity to constant release zangetsu http://www.mangapanda.com/94-574-10/bleach/chapter-120.html, further affirming its in shikai by pointing out that it he only hasnt achieved bankai, http://www.mangapanda.com/94-574-12/bleach/chapter-120.html, regular sword by the tsuba at the time of getting the sword http://www.mangapanda.com/bleach/529/5, not long after getting the sword its in the form we have known for years http://www.mangapanda.com/bleach/525/8. Also to your first point not being able to seal a zanpakuto is the foundation of the concept of constant-release. Also partial releases is when a different/incorrect name is used and has nothing to do with uncontrollable large reiatsu or having no name used at all. Ichigo's changes have to do with his unstable heritage and not having an asauchi. Point being zaraki's case is not simple. His true strength was sealed off by himself subconsciously and he neither wanted nor was he consciously capable of communicating with his zanpakuto for a long time. Thats all learned and the only difference between him in Ichigo in that situation is ichigo had no seal and communicated with his power and learned the name. Despite the various changes it was always a constant release. we dont know how constant-release and true forms work as both characters in response to this have different circumstances.--

Users
Shouldn't the template also have a column for the users of each Zanpakuto? It'd be much more convenient. -- IStoleThePies  | Message Wall  |  Contributions  22:13, February 6, 2015 (UTC)


 * No because this page is for zanpakuto, if your a fan you know which zanpakuto belongs to which wielder. Also simply clicking on the name takes you to the wielder page.--

Ise Family Zanpakuto
Can someone please add the Shinken Hakkyoken to this table? I think it would be under Kido type, due to its ability, but could be unclassified for the time being. Yatanogarasu (talk) 07:44, November 13, 2015 (UTC)
 * Excuse me? Please update now that we have the kanji. Yatanogarasu (talk) 03:52, November 20, 2015 (UTC)
 * It has been added, thanks for the reminder 11:26, November 20, 2015 (UTC)

Not achieved
Shouldn't all the "Not achieved" Bankais be reworded as "Not yet achieved"? It'd be more accurate and consistent. --  I  S T  O  L  E   T H  E   P I  E  S  π  09:34, February 21, 2016 (UTC)


 * If a Zanpakutō has its Bankai listed as "Not Achieved" instead of "Not Yet Achieved", that means the owner is somehow permanently incapable of attaining Bankai - generally they're just dead (Kaien, every filler Shinigami villain ever), but in Jirōbō Ikkanzaka's case, he doesn't have access to his Shinigami powers anymore, so he simply can't achieve it at all. That's why we make the distinction.--Xilinoc (talk) 17:00, February 21, 2016 (UTC)