Talk:Love me Bitterly Loth me Sweetly

Chapter 449 character appearance
Regarding the unidentified Shinigami. The ending scene from the previous chapter continues as the beginning of this one. Since the mysterious Shinigami is listed as Rukia at the character appearance section of the previous chapter, shouldn't we put her in place of the unidentified Shinigami? --The Goblin (talk) 08:58, August 28, 2011 (UTC)


 * No, because we do not know that it was Rukia. All the captains & lieutenants, plus Hanatarō, gave their power to that sword, so it could have been a number of people. It should not be listed on the previous chapter either so I'll correct that. 09:56, August 28, 2011 (UTC)

Rukia's appearance (clarification)
I could be misunderstanding the rules for how chapters and volumes are listed, but shouldn't Rukia be credited instead of "unidentified shinigami" in this volume? It was a different circumstance when we were genuinely unsure as to who the shinigami was, but now that we know that it was Rukia that was travelling with Urahara and Isshin, shouldn't her name be put in the place of "unidentified shinigami?" Or should it remain "unidentified" since her identity wasn't known when the chapters was published?


 * We do not know if it was Rukia. Remember, many, many people put their reiatsu into that sword. It could have been any one of them. There was never any clear indication given that it was Rukia. People just assume that it is Rukia since she is the one who ended up with the sword.--


 * Indeed, many people shared their reiatsu, but the anime reveals the shinigami was Rukia. -- The Goblin   Talk   17:32, December 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * The anime has it as Rukia, but the manga gave no indication, so it should be left as it is. 21:24, December 27, 2011 (UTC)


 * But why? Rukia says the same lines as this Unidentified character in the manga so it's pretty obvious that it is her.--Nekosama (talk) 14:10, March 7, 2012 (UTC)