Bleach Wiki talk:Image Gallery

Picture Change Guidelines
As per the Image Policy, nominate and discuss changes to the profile pictures of the character articles here and only here. The typical requirements for a profile picture are that it shows the character facing forward, in their typical attire and should not be battle-worn. They should be centered, have good lighting, and be of good quality. Candidates also must have valid and complete and  templates attached to them or else they will be rejected.

Votes
How to vote:

{|align=right


 * }


 * Vote by typing either of the following in the relevant sections:

Only one "Support" vote per user. Votes will be open only for a week of the initial pic being placed. At the end of the week the highest rated pic will win. If no pick is a clear winner, than an admin with pick the pic. If another pic is brought up after the picture is picked then the voting begins again with the pic that has already been picked and the new pic or pics.

Äs Nödt
Currently, Äs' profile has it from a semi-side angle, is somewhat lacking when it comes to smoothness and detail, and has part of a text bubble on the right side. I've found two other panels that 1. display it a bit more from the front, 2. are smoother and more detailed regarding its face, and 3. don't have any text bubbles. While admittedly the first proposal isn't 250px, it's the only decent image I found of it facing forward, and if it's preferred I could try to find a larger version. The second proposal, though, has some more detail and is zoomed in a bit more.--Xilinoc (talk) 06:16, July 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Option 2 for being detailed and isn't blurry around the eyes as Option 1, and is more camera facing than the current one we have.
 * 2) Option 2. It's not facing forward like 1 is, but it also doesn't have those "camera zoom" lines distorting it.  Mohrpheus   (Talk)  19:24, July 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Sorry out of those I prefer the current one, not only its shape and size, but its angle too and those other two are also at awkward angles as well!!


 * Neutral - Of the two proposed replacements, 2 is the better and it shows a little bit more of her face, even if it is from an odd angle. On the negative side, there it still has a text bubble and the spikes are a bit harder to discern. 1 is rather lacking imo. The question is how much better is prop2 than the current pic. To me the answer is not that much better. I'm inclined to leave it be until a better shot comes along. 12:58, July 22, 2013 (UTC)

Bambietta Basterbine
While there's nothing blatantly wrong with Bambietta's current image, she's portrayed from a diagonal view, and her colors and the details of her face are a bit muted. The proposals are more detailed and not gray. The first proposal, as with the above discussion for Äs, isn't 250px, nor is the second proposal, unfortunately, but it is probably the best one in terms of her facing the camera, so if it's preferred, there's probably a larger version somewhere. The third and fourth proposals show her in her recent, more serious appearance, which seems a bit more accurate than, say, the cutesy little girl cutting through Shinigami soldiers.--Xilinoc (talk) 06:16, July 17, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) all proposals. The first two have some distracting stuff such as the other panels and sound effect symbols. The third she isn't facing forward as much as the current one and the fourth a good portion of her face is obscured by her hat
 * 2) Other than the shading there is nothing wrong with the current picture. She may not be directly facing the viewer, but you can see all of her face, which is the point of the facing the viewer criteria. Nothing is lost by her looking slightly to the side. Of the proposed pics, op1 is the only one I'd consider, but I am opposed to changing this at this time.  12:58, July 22, 2013 (UTC)

Shizuku
Okay, so this is something I've been meaning to bring up for a while now. Shizuku's current profile is...ehhhhh. He's looking at the camera with his face turned to the side, his scythe's handle is just...there for no good reason, and you don't see much of his face. While that last bit may not be possible in any frame due to his hairstyle, I think we can do better. Of the two possible replacements I've found, the first one shows more of his shoulders and chest and is brighter, but isn't as focused on his face and has his mouth open in surprise. The second one is more focused on his face and has him with a neutral expression, but is somewhat darker save for the left side. Either way, I think they're both better than the current one.--Xilinoc (talk) 01:01, August 7, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Of the two, I prefer Proposal 2 more, due to the neutral expression and the focus on the face.--Xilinoc (talk) 01:01, August 7, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) Option 2 as well, more natural expression better than current one!!
 * 3) Door #2 because it is a direct angle and looks better.

Haschwalth
It's that time again. Now, Haschwalth's current profile doesn't violate any sort of rule - he's facing forward, his face can be seen in detail, etc. - but the main reasons for me wanting to change it are 1. the background being a "cleaned" version, and 2. the rain, which mats down his hair and changes his appearance. The proposal has Haschwalth facing a bit more towards the camera, has a non-cleaned background, is more focused on his face, and - most importantly - doesn't have any rain, meaning his hair is in its natural state and there aren't water droplets in random places.--Xilinoc (talk) 04:26, September 8, 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) As proposer, I support this change.--Xilinoc (talk) 04:26, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 2) - It's an overall improvement. The current pic has rain on his face, so it is technically a problem. Arrancar109  (Talk)  04:30, September 8, 2013 (UTC)
 * 3) For already stated reasons.  Mohrpheus   (Talk)  04:34, September 8, 2013(UTC)
 * 4) As per Mohrph.
 * 5) I don't even think I need to say it.
 * 6) Better.  14:54, September 8, 2013 (UTC)

Cataloging
Place any images that are to be cataloged in the Image Galleries here.