Board Thread:Improvements and Issues/@comment-38534384-20190505131246/@comment-957629-20190505174459

You are comparing centimetres, which is a metric term, to feet which is not metric.

A foot is 12 inches, thus you cannot divide a metric number by a non metric number to get a result. SURE you can the number of FEET but not the number of FEET and INCHES as there are not ten inches in a foot so you cannot use decimalisation the same way that you would in a metric system.

4'9" does not equal 4.9 feet because that measuring system goes to 4'11" which is bigger than 4'9" and yet by your argument 4'11" would equal 4.11 feet despite 4'9" being smaller than 4'11" and 4.9 being bigger than 4.11

150 / 30.48 = 4.9 FT 150 / 30.48 =/= 4'9"

For comparison sake. That like saying 4 and half hours is 4.5 hours BUT that does not equal 4 hours and 50 minutes BUT 4 hours and 30 minutes because hours are broken up into 60 minutes, not tens. So to find the minutes you need to find 0.5 of 60 minutes which is 30 minutes.

SO you are converting from cm to ft instead of from cm to ft and inches. To get the inches you need to take the 0.9 and find 0.9 of 12 inches with is 10.8 which we then round up because we decided to round to the nearest half an inch. The nearest halves in this case is 10.5 and 11.0 with the halfway mark being 10.75 and since 10.8 is higher than that then it goes to 11 inches.

SO yeah, her height is correct.