User talk:Reikson

Welcome
Welcome to Bleach Wiki! Thanks for your edit to Barragan Luisenbarn page, and thanks for joining our community! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.


 * Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help.


 * Questions? You can ask on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!


 * Need help? You can find it right here! You can also find a full list of help pages here.


 * Don't know what to do? The Community Portal has an outline of the site, and has links to pages to get you started!


 * Please sign in every time you edit, so that we can recognize you!


 * Here are some more pages you might find useful:


 * Policy - follow this to ensure harmony on the wiki
 * Manual of Style - a guide to how articles here are organized and written
 * Spoiler Policy - follow this to not ruin upcoming stories for those yet to read or watch the new chapter or episode


 * Sign your name in discussions by typing ~ , which automatically adds your signature and the date, so we know who's talking!

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- WhiteStrike (Talk) 2009-05-08T13:54:03

hey
where did you get soifon's raikou muchi? It was not stated in the manga.--Agate genbu 15:56, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

I would agree i reverted it until theirs an explanation for where that came from. Salubri 16:07, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

I found a literal translation somewhere and then used this online engine in order to translate the kanji to romaji; Hornet Thunder Whip literally translates to Suzumebachi Raikou Muchi, and that Jaku-something or other thing was in parentheses right next to it. --Reikson 17:20, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Cero Metralleta
Please stop reverting the translation for Starrk's technique the correct translation is Infinite Ammunition Hollow Flash not All Bullet reloding WhiteStrike 14:19, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well as you put it you don't speak or write japanese so if someone is changing something back is for a reason. Not sure how you want me to prove that I am fluent so I'll just say this while I am not fluent I do live in Japan and for the sake of learning how to comunicate I do know how to properly look something up to translate it. Also if you keep changing this info it will be taken as vandalism and you will be block. WhiteStrike 14:50, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

Re: About Patros
Yes i know Dattebayo put that but there is no proof that his Resurrección is writen as "Lacking Wounds". Until Kubo says something about it then that's fine but if Dattebayo says something like that there is no proof. Also i have looked on alot of japanese bleach fansites and all they put is the katakana for Gerifalte so people from japan don't know how Kubo writes it.--Kisukeiscool100396 17:00, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

Speculation
Regarding your question to Twocents, anything involving a rumor is speculation. Ancient Chaos 05:47, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Ancient Chaos beat me to replying (thanks - I was a bit busy at the time), but yes, any time you have to use words like "rumor," that should be a clear tip off that it's speculation. Furthermore, the "inference" of facts not proven is also speculation. When making edits, I would suggest thinking to yourself, "If asked, can I provide references to specifice episodes/chapters, official materials, or official interviews to prove this?" If no, it's speculation and should not be added. Twocents 05:55, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

I cannot speak or read any language other than English. Perhaps, if you have a particular problem with my edit, you could address it to someone who can - perhaps WhiteStrike? Twocents 06:39, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: Question
I didn't reverse it arbitrarily. We capitalize Zanpakuto on here. Thus, I undid your edit because you uncapitalized Zanpakuto. Please refer to the Bleach_Wiki:Manual_of_Style before making future edits so we won't have this confusion again. Twocents 04:19, November 14, 2009 (UTC)

Re:Tosen
Just saying thank u. Minato  01:59, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

Yes i was aware that it was catalan, it whats spoken officially in andorra and parts of Spain. Salubri 02:13, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

RE:Shinji
The translation of the name (irritation) is enough what the meaning of the irritation isn't necessary its just whats used to describe the way in which irritation is meant by the translators, but not apart of what needs to be listed in the section. Possibly something to be listed in the trivia section. Also the translation is obviously incorrect as Aizen's zanpakuto doesn't control the nervous system but the senses. Not to mention the information of what he insinuates doesnt constitute ability and in any case it will just be removed next chapter for a actual description. Salubri 02:32, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

What he does is use 'absolute hypnosis' which is carried out via sight. Those that cannot see cannot be affected. Once they have been hypnotized their sense are affected in that it allows him to control what their senses perceive. Though the sense of sight appears as its primary function. Having said that the point is we had an issue with manga stream ands its translations being off what is actually said. The nervous system is something that has never been used to describe aizens zanpakuto's ability. Plus it goes to far into it medically seeing as the nervous system controls not only the senses but also pain and sense of gravity which aizen's zanpakuto is not said to do. These things are more the realm of unohana or mayuri while what aizen's zanpakuto does is a simple spell on the senses. Salubri 03:12, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

Tosen
whatever your doing with the kanji is not the right way to do it, thats why you follow the same form as previous ones. Salubri (Talk)  02:42, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Thats really not necessary there is more concern if the kanji is right, no one here is japanese so no one will care where anything begins or ends so reading it or being that detailed (which i cant say is a good thing because no one will think its right here we just dont do it regardless of the reason) is unnecessary especially when people find it and see that it is not apart of what is actually written down. Also i didnt take it out arrancar109 did which goes to show you its not just me. Salubri (Talk)  02:53, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Edit to Sajin Komamura's translation
I have no idea why you just decided to change Komamura's bankai translation, nor do I care. We had a discussion about it not too long ago and explanation for the translation was given on the talk page. Do not change it. Tinni  (Talk)  14:42, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

The fact that you have not been around lately has zero barring on what you did. You are not a new member of the wiki and as such should be aware that we do not randomly go around changing translations without discussion. As such you should have checked the talk page or, in the very least, brought is up on the talk page. As it happened. You made the change with zero explanation. You did not even put a comment down on the summary text box. It would seem to me common sense to at least do that when you are making a major change like completely changing the translation. I don't presume people to be aware of every single discussion that takes place on the wiki. But I do expect them to explain their actions when they make major changes. Tinni  (Talk)  16:52, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

Ok I have to say this. Given that your talk page is littered with warnings from multiple admins regarding your edits to translations and kanji, even if you did just dabble, you should be aware that any changes you make to those things would be reverted as soon as it was seen. Therefore, I really have to wonder why you would waste your time and those of others (given that all new edits have to be patrolled), by making the edits in the first place. I am always welcoming of those who want to make a genuine contribution to the wiki, however minor. I am not welcoming of people who show such callous disregard for very simple procedures designed only to keep erroneous information out of the wiki. Tinni  (Talk)  17:34, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

Someone who has 400+ edits since May does not "dabble". The problem (namely unilaterally changing translations without any explanation, which is not allowed) was pointed out to you. Accept it and learn from it. There is no need for pointless arguments. -- Yyp (Talk) 17:56, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

User Page Policy
It is against the User Page Policy to remove warnings from admins. Do not do it again. -- Yyp (Talk) 17:56, January 16, 2010 (UTC)

How to Add References
Adding references is a very simple thing to do. Just add   or   to the relevant piece of text that you are adding. -- Yyp (Talk) 17:43, February 3, 2010 (UTC)

Missing Kanji
You seem good at getting kanji up from screenshots. If it's not too much trouble, can you also get Shiyo and Konoka Suzunami's as well? I've got screenshots posted on the right so you don't have to dig them up from scratch. Arrancar109 (Talk)  18:22, March 13, 2010 (UTC)

Changes to translations are to be discussed first
Please note that any changes to the translations should be discussed first (or at the very least explained in the edit summary, if the explanation is short enough to fit in there). We might be putting up a project page dedicated solely to translation issues soon, put in the mean time, it can go on the relevant article's talk page. Thanks Yyp  (Talk) 10:08, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

I am getting really sick of repeating myself and I would really like to know why it is not getting through to you. DO NOT TOUCH TRANSLATIONS! You have in the past admitted that you go of what other people say in forums and the likes. You have no knowledge of languages yourself. That doesn't fill us with confidence. Indeed, even people knowledgeable in languages have the decency to bring up things in talk pages before they go around changing things. I have no idea why you think you are so special that you can't follow the rules or even basic etiquettes but it has to stop. You have got to get it through you head that changing translations is not "aesthetic improvement", it's pretty substantial change. So once again: LEAVE TRANSLATIONS ALONE! I don't know how much clearer I can be about this. Tinni  (Talk)  13:47, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

You said that the last time but then came back a few months later and went right back to unilaterally changing translations. Forgive me if I don't believe that you have gotten the hint. Tinni  (Talk)  13:53, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

That is not the point I was making, so I'll say it again: any changes to the translations should be discussed first. I am quite happy to have the translations corrected if they re wrong. But, just like every single other person on this wiki, you have to justify the changes by providing proof. Tinni has already said most of what needs to be said on this. Now drop the attitude and explain why your changes should be allowed. -- Yyp (Talk) 14:29, March 27, 2010 (UTC)