Talk:Side Story...Ichigo and the Magic Lamp

Kon
Should we count Kon in the characters in order of appearance? Even if he was an inanimate object I think he should be listed--God (Pray)  19:03, September 7, 2010 (UTC)

I'd say go ahead. It's really no different than listing the speechless Yoruichi. Mohrpheus (talk) 04:14, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Alright, I went ahead and put him in there as the magic lamp. If anyone objects they can take it out--God (Pray)  04:17, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

I disagree. Kon did not appear in that episode any more than Mayuri, Yamamoto & Komamura did. If we list him, we should list them too, which I don't think should be done. Kon is already listed in the trivia with them. I think that is the best way, rather than in the list of characters. 18:38, September 8, 2010 (UTC)

Kon had much more screen time and Ichigo actually said "Is that kon?" that is why I think he should be listed in the characters in order of appearance. While Mayuri and all the other cameos were seen, Kon was the only one mentioned and acknowledged--God (Pray)  17:12, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Isane Dream, End of Episode
Isane's dream is a direct reference to Manga 179, page 20. This scene was deleted (not used) in the anime version of the show during the actual part it should of been in. I think we should put some sort of reference. Even if it is in the Trvia section. As it is clearly the "same" scene. She awakens to a dream about fishcakes and walks outside to see Unohana sitting outside, even though there is change in the dialog the scene still holds the same concept. Just a thought, let me know what you people think. Ltjuno (talk) 17:08, September 9, 2010 (UTC)


 * It's not quite the same scene. It was done in the anime, but in an omake. And there are several differences. Firstly, Unohana verbally acknowledges Isane being present, causing her to fidget nervously. Secondly, after sitting next to Unohana, Unohana does speak with Isane (I think it was for her to take it easy or something like that). The scene's similar, not the same. Arrancar109 (Talk)  17:11, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

I know, that is what I am saying, it is not the exact duplicate, but it is clearly similar in some ways. I just thought I would throw it out there in case anyone didn't notice, and maybe put on the page about if you people think it would good. Ltjuno (talk) 17:16, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

In that case, I don't see the harm in doing that, just as long as they don't say it's the exact same scene. I think it depends on how the other users feel, but again, I personally don't see the harm in doing it. Arrancar109 (Talk)  17:18, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Ok I will wait for a few more opinions on it before I write anything on the page itself. Thanks for the advice Arrancar109. Ltjuno (talk) 17:20, September 9, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, if we put it in the trivia section it should be fine--God (Pray)  17:21, September 9, 2010 (UTC)