User talk:Godisme

Re:Troublesome User
All right, just one thing though is that I'm not sure if making those redirects in the arc links actually goes against the policies since I noticed that the newer episodes have those redirects, and I'm 90% sure they were added by Yyp. I would look in the history of those episodes and see who added the redirect, but for some reason my computer isn't letting me right now, since it's being REALLY slow right now and took about ten minutes just to let me go on your talk page. Anyway, once it starts going fast again I'll ask about this. TheDevilHand888 (talk) 23:30, October 25, 2010 (UTC)

Finally got the history section to go up for episode 293 and I was right that Yyp added them in, so I'll ask him about it. TheDevilHand888 (talk) 23:55, October 25, 2010 (UTC)

?
why though

sorry im new to the whole wikia thing but kenseis hilt is wraped in purple in the picture of him as a captain the light makes it look like its white i just want it done right. but im not trying to make you mad but he is my fav. char. so like i said i just want it done right.

thats because in the manga it has to be white cause in manga its black and white so they have to use white for a light purple color i know what im talking about.Xx-Tret-xX (talk) 22:58, October 29, 2010 (UTC) and why do i need to do this.

why cant you just leave me alone please.Xx-Tret-xX (talk) 23:12, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

ok sorry but if i include that in the manga the hilt is white wil you leave it.Xx-Tret-xX (talk) 23:19, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

well ill try as well but i cant promis much my computer sux.Xx-Tret-xX (talk) 23:23, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

GOT IT go to this site http://media.photobucket.com/image/kensei%20muguruma/ColliNyxie/Bleach/kensei.jpg?o=5    Xx-Tret-xX (talk) 23:30, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

You take a look at it yet?Xx-Tret-xX (talk) 23:39, October 29, 2010 (UTC)

RE: edits
Lolys page was an accident when I edited it. The internet froze up and I couldn't use it until I exit it out with a bunch of end now signs. About wonderweiss, the pictures were not in the wright place, and he needed a lot of text addition. I took the time to read the manga and edit it at the same time. And about the pictures, what do you mean about "not file". That's how I get the html codes to add it to the text, and there is no way I can add pictures to the text since there is only a left and right option....Morgan silve (talk) 12:45, October 30, 2010 (UTC)morgan silve

Should I even edit? Cause' everything I do is wrong somehow....Morgan silve (talk) 14:44, October 30, 2010 (UTC)Morgan silve

I was wondering was Isshin Kurosaki a real Captin of the 13 Squads because I realy don't know so that is why I am ask you is he was or not. It is something I have been wandering about for a while so can you tell me pleaseRukia Kuchiki 00:11, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Project for you
Hey Godisme I have something for you. Though you dont commonly do so and may even be a bit apprehensive about it at first I figured as your not in charge of any particular project this would be a perfect chance to get you to become a little more well rounded in site edits. Namely the Bleach Wiki:Fight Summary Project. I find there are increasingly overwhelming amounts of information on fights in bleach yet to be taken care of namely the anime arcs. In light of that to get them we need to finish the manga ones with the first arc agent of the shinigami being the only left to finish. One more fight really is all thats left if is one actual fight. But other then that what I wanted to see you work out is the main fight summary. In this case The Death Trilogy Overture: Death & The Strawberry. This is basically the overall rundown of what takes place in the arc. For an example of how to do it check the Ryoka Invasion. Its basically separated into different categories of storyline time. Prelude, Early Stages, Middle Stages, End Stages and Aftermath. The various stages should be no longer then 5 reference points when means simple summarizing of arc info. highlighting the main points. What I would like is for you and Lia both to collaborate on this. You should actually find that its not as hard as it seems especially if you use the information already provided by the fights and events within the overall arc. If you have any questions feel free to ask. --Salubri (Talk)  16:39, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

Is it really?
I was reading the community wiki's top blog atm, which had 46 editors. The topic was "Is it really illegal for people under 13 to contribute to wikipedia?!!!.' So yeah, is it? Luigi ○G. Lamborgini 

Here's the link then, cause I can't understand it, theres alot of yes's and no's I tried putting my opinion on it aswell.http://community.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Lssj4/Its_illegal_to_be_on_here_under_13%3F!%3F!%3F!%3FLuigi ○G. Lamborgini

Lets just say.....I'm a year under (between you and me), honestly how old do you think I am? I do seem thirdteen though don't I, please don't kick me off of wiki for the next 7 1/2 months! I really like contributing to this wiki, and wiki itself!!!=[ Luigi ○G. Lamborgini

Happy Tree Friends Wikia Needs Your Help!
I know that Happy Tree Friends is clearly erelavent to Bleach, but their wikia needs alot of help from other admins due to people trashing their site, and adding fan made media. The admins from their site are trying their best to prevent this, but they really need help. Heres a blog post so that you can see in: http://happytreefriends.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Dymandafan664/A_Message_to_all_the_Wikia_users_here_(expect_all_the_HTF_Haters,_ruiners_of_pages_and_fan_mans) when I was reading this, it was truley astonishing. If we help them, then there will be alot of friendship and help amongst their wikia and ours giving us both an opertunity to rely on eachother for certain things. The reason why I'm messaging you this is because I am not an admin, and you are. Please, http://www.happytreefriends.wikia.com needs your help! Luigi'○G.'Lamborgini

Re: Fight Summary
Whatever suits better for you. Based on the Ryoka Invasion article, we have to do a very short overview of the Fight Summaries involved in the "arc", almost like a newspaper report, very short and concise. I think if we divide it in Prelude, Early Stages, Middle Stages, End Stages and Aftermath, the Prelude would obviously be Ichigo vs Fishbone D, Early Stages would go perhaps up to the fight against Shrieker, Mid Stages from Mod Soul Incident to the fight against the Demi-Hollow, and End Stages would cover the rest. And the Aftermath would be a paragraph saying Ichigo got his powers back and everyone leaves to the Soul Society. Dunno, if I got it right, but I think that's the general idea of what we've got to do, in a very very short and undetailed way, only the most basic info. What do you think? Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  23:11, November 3, 2010 (UTC)

So one of us does one section and the other does the next? Sounds good to me. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  23:51, November 3, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I started with the Introduction, I tried to follow the pattern from the other "Conflict" articles, so I'll leave the Prelude to you then? Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  02:55, November 4, 2010 (UTC)

OK, BTW, someone addresed a question directly at you in Bleach Answers. I'm a bit pissed because I answered the same question 30 minutes ago, but this person apparently thinks I'm ignorant or something because he/she keeps asking the same question over and over again. Would you mind answering? Seems like my answer wasn't satisfactory enough. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  03:07, November 4, 2010 (UTC)

It looks fine imo. I'll work on the next section tomorrow, I have a paper due tomorrow and I'm not even halfway done (I've been neglecting it all day long and it's already 10 pm) Lia Schiffer   (Talk)  03:57, November 4, 2010 (UTC)

Don't worry, I understand how it is when your computer crashes, I've started working on the Early Stages, but I was not at home today, so I could only write a couple lines about the first fight (I've saved them in a Word document), I'll try to finish tomorrow. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  05:44, November 5, 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I was too busy the whole weekend and couldn't work at all. I didn't even touch the computer on Friday and got late at home on Saturday but I'm almost done (I hope) I'm just missing the last fight of the Early Stages. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  20:27, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

Well, the Early Stages is done (took me ages). No rush, I'll have a busy week too (I should be reading two books now!!), so I might be writing along the week in my Word and see how it goes. Writing super short summaries is so hard. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  01:37, November 8, 2010 (UTC)

I had forgotten about the reference limit. I made few cuts, I tried to do some more and it made no sense at all. So I checked the other conflict articles and noticed they comprise the references in chapters rather than pages, so I did that, and I managed to get inside the limit. I hope Salubri doesn't chop my head off for being incapable of hyper summarization. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  03:13, November 9, 2010 (UTC)

OK, I think it's OK, though I think some parts could use a little less detail, but I don't think there's much problem. I've already started with the End Stages, 'm just missing the Broken Coda and Shattered Shaft. I had written something much longer and then thought it was too long and started cutting like crazy. As for the pics, I wanted to wait til I finished writing everything before adding them, but yeah, I'll add them myself, don't worry about that. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  09:13, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

I am finally done with the End Stages. I think it looks too long, but if you read it, it just can't get any shorter. There are too many fights there. I'll leave the Aftermath to you then, and I'm adding the pictures right now. Lia Schiffer  (Talk)  10:37, November 15, 2010 (UTC)

Well Congratulations!!!, you two did it. So how does it feel putting together one of the event summaries, one of the hardest versions of the fight summaries. Im surprised you guys did real well. It came out perfectly. Good Job. It wasn't too hard I watched the whole process, you two didnt seem to need any help and it worked out real well with the two of you supporting each other. I only wish that other users worked at that level maybe the article improvement page wouldn't be full of articles that aren't getting handled. In any case I hope that you have relieved yourself of any anxiety you have about doing work like this. --Salubri (Talk)  02:34, November 16, 2010 (UTC)

Proper Image Place
new here where's the proper place?°Aizen° (talk) 19:08, November 7, 2010 (UTC)

bleach village in Namco Namja Theme Park
This is really cool, damn wish I could go. http://bleach.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Lemursrule/Bleach_village_in_Japan...OMFG_THEY_HAVE_GRIMMJOW_%26_GIN_ICE_CREAM! --Lemursrule (talk) 21:49, November 8, 2010 (UTC)

sorry i didn't mean it i just wanted to edit the page to help(sorry for sending this message so late i was kinda busy)

Re:Maintenance ?
Not that I'm aware of, but they don't tend to advertise it. Seems fine to me right now, but I had a lot of trouble with it over the past 2 or 3 days. Whatever it is seems to be sorted or intermittent. 23:24, November 12, 2010 (UTC)

Bleach Soul Ignition for PS3
I wrote some info on the talk page for video games. I think we need to create a ps3 section and a page for the game. --Lemursrule (talk) 19:50, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

Let me make something clear, here
I don't know if you noticed, but what I removed was something I put up. I had a simple question, and Yvp answered it for me. I felt that my question didn't need to be up there anymore, so I removed it. Why would somebody else need to read my question when it's now redundant? It's just a waste of space that's better spent on other things. I don't know if that's against user policy, but there's a fine line between removing somebody else's edit, and removing your own edit. If that's against policy, then that's just really, really, dumb. Aeron Solo (talk) 22:12, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

Ok, ok, geez, sorry. I had no idea that it was against policy. I only did it because it logically made sense. Well, now I know, and thank you, but this "attitude" you speak of only came from you sounding slightly wrathful. Not to rebuke you or anything, but sometimes a little "please" helps people talk a little nicer. Otherwise, we get defensive. I'm not trying to be your mother or whatever, but I got a little hurt from the tone behind your words. That's why the 'tude came out.

Thanks for the info! Aeron Solo (talk) 22:20, November 14, 2010 (UTC)

RE: Avatar
Yeah I did; thanks for the info and pic Godisme. Captain Brooks (talk) 17:10, November 17, 2010 (UTC)

Sekkiseki Negates Airwalking
You said it was said directly. Where? I've read and re-read the series and have yet to see that tidbit of information in the manga. Please provide a reference page. RecklessFire (talk) 05:36, November 18, 2010 (UTC)

I know the part you are referring to and it is the same part that I specifically triple checked before following through on my edit. Without proof, is this statement not just speculation? I don't know the policies like the back of my hand, but I'm pretty sure a factual site such as this doesn't allow mere guesses. If a reference page cannot be provided, then I don't see why it's even up there. Plus, as I provided, both Ichigo and Hitsugaya have demonstrated this technique for at least two panels each during their respective fights with Byakuya and Gin. If anything, that's proof against the current entry. RecklessFire (talk) 06:03, November 18, 2010 (UTC)

Okay. Someone else I know suggested the Bankai thing, but since his Bankai does hyper-speed combat, I don't see why it would just allow him to stand on mid-air. As for the flying device, which that same person brought up, I attribute it to speed. After all, Ichigo needed to haul ass, and which is faster; running on the air, or flying? Flying, obviously. As for Yoruichi's mantle, I think it's the same principle as the wand, not to mention neither require skill to wield, so it doesn't seem like something that would be necessary. Uh, let me know what you find out, I guess. I'd be surprised if I overlooked something like that. RecklessFire (talk) 06:16, November 18, 2010 (UTC)

Perfectly fine on the wait, I was busy myself. Thank you for confirming that for me~ RecklessFire (talk) 08:44, November 27, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Infoboxes
Well Ill check on that i haven't seen what i would use for that but if i had to guess that, but using the special human template. --Salubri (Talk)  01:45, November 21, 2010 (UTC)

yea that could work. --Salubri <font color="FFFFFF" size="2px">(Talk)  02:12, November 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Old Redirect
Thanks for notifying me. I went ahead and moved it (and corrected the links on the page). And FYI, the "Move" option still exists; the "Edit" button has an arrow next to it, which should have the "Move" option listed there. Again, thanks for notifying me. <font color="teal" size="2px">Arrancar109 <font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)  05:45, November 22, 2010 (UTC)

Promoting Feat. Votes in New Look
As we found out last month, one of the problems with the new look is site-wide communications. So to make sure that users see it, when you make your weekly blog please include a notice to the following effect:


 * Voting is open for December's Featured Article, Featured Picture and Featured Quote!


 * But remember to follow the Voting Policy otherwise your vote will not count. Main points - members must have been actively contributing to the wiki this month, must be members for over 1 month, must give valid reasons and vote for article quality instead of favourite characters.

Thanks, 15:43, November 22, 2010 (UTC)

Thats great, thanks. As I said to Lemuresrule, place it wherever you think is best and use whatever wording you wish - doesn't matter so long as its mentioned. Thanks again, 11:37, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Attitude
Regardless of attitude, it's ridiculous. Wikia are meant to be a team. Is it a team effort to revert someone's edit, when all it requires is a quick copy/paste job? If I was an admin, and I saw someone doing that, I would add onto their edit. Not just revert it and say "Oh sorry, you made a mistake. Sucks for you. Do it again." It's like being a teacher, and instead of helping a student when they get something wrong on an assignment, they rip it up and tell them to repeat it. I may not understand the method of how you guys run this place, it's pure common sense, and courtesy as well. If I was being rude in my statement, which I don't really see how, then I am sorry. But, regardless, my point remains. --Seireitou-shishō (My True Identity 21:19, November 23, 2010 (UTC)

Moves

 * and that, what it is ? Ju gatsu mikka (talk) 15:22, November 24, 2010 (UTC)
 * First, we don't have the all star characters, and so ? As long as I remember, it had never been an obligation on this wiki before creating a page on a new volume : we don't have it now, then we will put it it when we have it, that all.
 * Second, the title is not all we know : we know also the isbn number, the date of publication and the number of pages (222). With the last, we can can deduce the number of chapters (10). So what is missing ? Ah yeah, the all star that true and a good picture of the cover, anything else is here.
 * Third, what is different between cut + paste and rename it ? Well, at least for the second we have a part of the history is the article and not in the redirection, that's a little more respectful for those who wrote it but... And there is NO other difference. Ju gatsu mikka (talk) 15:41, November 24, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Site Question
I wouldn't know as far as I can remember the site has always made it so you have to be signed in if you wish to edit here. --<font color="00A693" size="2px">Salubri <font color="FFFFFF" size="2px">(Talk)  20:45, November 25, 2010 (UTC)

Yea no intentions of doing so, matter fact we never had the conversation.--<font color="00A693" size="2px">Salubri <font color="FFFFFF" size="2px">(Talk)  07:02, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

Its my understanding that limiting a wiki to registered users only is something that Wikia disproves of and only does in extreme cases of constant/regular vandalism over a period of time. It must be requested via Special:Contact. I don't know how bad it has to be before they will consider turning it on, but don't hold out hope for them doing it. 12:34, November 26, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!
It means a lot, coming from you :) WD   Converse  22:39, November 27, 2010 (UTC)

Grimmjow: MIA
Hey, Godisme,

Seems I did something wrong again. Anyway, I just thought we should mention on his page that Grimmjow is MIA, so to speak. Nobody actually knows what happened to him in the end, right? I just thought that should be explicitly stated for people who really wonder what happened to him (Not that we really know). Not to get worked up about it or anything, but could you tell me how I screwed up so I don't do the same thing twice?

Thanks!

Aeron Solo (talk) 01:16, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

P.S. if I seem to be questioning your judgement, I'm not. I just have a way of wording things badly, so sorry if you take offense.

New post:

All right, thanks. Things are a lot clearer now.

On a side note, how do you do the reference thing? I'm a little back-world on that. Just thought I'd ask quickly before I forget. Aeron Solo (talk) 01:26, November 29, 2010 (UTC)

Bleach Village in Namco Namja Theme Park (update)
Hey I wasn't able to find any videos inside Bleach Namja, but I got the next best thing. I found a new promo video showing the EXTREMELY LONG LINE to enter Bleach Namja, and I posted it in my food blog. Plus the current flame war between Ichiruki and Ishihime shippers about unconfirmed spoilers for the new movie is HILARIOUS! --Lemursrule (talk) 02:58, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Closing Discussions
Hey, Godisme,

How do you close discussions? I started a topic on the Soul Society forum wondering why the Sekisekki seemed to fail on several instances, only to read some stuff on your talk page discussing the said subject and I found that the discussion was pretty much pointless, since Sekisekki doesn't stop Shinigami from standing on the air. Just so no one adds to it, can you close it, or tell me how to close it?

Thanks!

Aeron Solo (talk) 12:36, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

I see...any way to permanently keep people from adding more pointless stuff to that section? Aeron Solo (talk) 17:36, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

I see...okay. Thanks for your time! Aeron Solo (talk) 17:52, November 30, 2010 (UTC)

Hey
Hey what happened I thought you was gonna do the new 'Bleach Wiki' logo, what happened.--<font color="00A693" size="2px">Salubri  <font color="FFFFFF" size="2px">(Talk)  03:19, December 1, 2010 (UTC)

Gin Ichimaru Edit, rockleefan411
Hey there, so I made a edit to Gin Ichimaru and you chnaged it I am guessing. I am sure it was the right thing to do but why? Wasn't that fitting for the Gin page?

Szayel Aporro Grantz: User of Gran Rey Cero? Plus other stuff
Hey Godisme,

Since Szayel Aporro Grantz was using a Gran Rey Cero in Hell, shouldn't we put that underneath his "powers and abilities" stuff?

Also, I brought up a subject under the talk section for Kaname Tosen that no one has bothered to look at. I don't want to bring it up directly, and I don't want you to tell me your thoughts on my talk page; can you please go to the bottom of "logic error" and read my question, then put out your thoughts right there? I just want to hear someone else's opinion.

Thanks!

Aeron Solo (talk) 03:37, December 2, 2010 (UTC)

Chapters Manga
Hi there

I saw you locked that section, but i see no harm on it

Could yuo please add this

cuz i found it and is confirmed

in here

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Bleach_chapters#Volumes_41.E2.80.93current

It states this:

thank you for reading

PortalDark clear

My Image
Is it acceptable now? I read the policy, but ignorantly thought it would be done for me. I'm new, and just want to add unique images when I get them. So adding the rationale, does that make it okay? It wont let me add it to the gallery. File:TesHoldsOri.png Hyuugaman (talk) 00:56, December 4, 2010 (UTC)

Blog Comment
Cant see it either. But when I went into my contributions and went to edit it from there, it told me that I dont have permission to edit my own post?!? Anyway, I've reposted it with the windows only bit added in. I'll delete the duplicate post if it does actually show up. 23:06, December 6, 2010 (UTC)

Episode 300
Hey by the way Kisuke dose use his shikai in this episode,and I,am not talking about his flashback fight with Yammy.He releases it when his Kidō doesn't work on Aizen,If you what a source go to BleachGet. com or just go to Kisuke's page.

Technical Difficulties
Weirdly enough, the Wiki's "new" width didn't become apparent to me until about an hour ago. Seriously, an hour ago, it was at the fixed width it had originally. I'm not sure what's up with that. Additionally, article history seems to have disappeared from the articles themselves, and I can't seem to comment on your blog (even though others had). I'm not sure what those guys are going with but it seems to be adding some minor problems. You noticed any of the other problems I listed? And have you noticed anything else as well? <font color="teal" size="2px">Arrancar109 <font color="teal" size="1px">(Talk)  19:20, December 9, 2010 (UTC)

RE:Image Attribution
I'll leave it to Yyp, I already left him a message about it. I dont really deal with that type of code and he does. --<font color="00A86B" size="2px">Salubri <font color="00A86B" size="2px">(Talk)  08:36, December 11, 2010 (UTC)

Battle with W.
I wouldn't bother with going to war with wikipedia. They deal in a level of jackass concepts that are epic to say the least. Basically they are the common Jack of all trades and master of none. There is alot of information they provide and alot they leave out. Short of finding a interview from Kubo agreeing with your points there is no way to get them to change. On the plus side the information they present on Bleach is no more then the basic stuff so it doesn't matter what they put as long as the information we place is accurate and trumps it thereby making us even more of a credible source for bleach information. Also on that note the issues you are running into seem to be a lack of intelligence and knowledge about most of the stuff the users on wikipedia place. Leading me to believe that they are just simply recycling information from elsewhere (more credible sources) and don't have any actual knowledge or research on the information they post up. Hence the bases by which most educational institutions will tell you not to use wikipedia as its not a credible source of information. This the focal point of the wikia pages we have the potential to be individually be more then what wikipedia aspires to be. In my view that aspiration is to be vaguely informative and greatly limited with users that aspire to that concept as well. --<font color="00A86B" size="2px">Salubri <font color="00A86B" size="2px">(Talk)  03:47, December 12, 2010 (UTC)