User talk:Minato88

Welcome
Hi, welcome to Bleach Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Bleach Wiki:Featured Article page.

Here's a wiki tip for you -- you can sign your name on talk/discussion pages by typing ~ which automatically adds your signature and the date.

Check out Help:Contents for more tricks. Also, remember that a wiki is a community, and that you'll almost always find someone to help you if you're having problems. Don't hesitate to ask for help! ;)

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Arrancar109 (Talk) 23:23, September 29, 2009

RE:Lisa Yadamura
It in fact needs to go back to dragonfly. I know the ancient spear that makes a direct correlation to her zanpakuto. It is part of three great spears held by the imperial royal family. Damesfly maybe a translation but im not sure that it fits with the style/shape and obvious name connections used.Salubri 16:47, October 2, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Oct. Featured Article
Thanks for understanding man. I really appreciate it.:)--Ethelion 02:20, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Rukia's pic
Sorry about that. A new pic isn't necessary, but it has crossed my mind. Yes, my main concern was how the image was aligned, but it's better to let people who are familiar with the character infoboxes handle it. If anything, I'll change it when I feel that a more suitable mugshot is found, as I have kept that image there before, and other mugshots have been turned down before, either because they weren't that good or they were old. Like I've explained to Tinni, I'm hunting for newer profile pics for many of the characters. Arrancar109 18:48, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Ichigo's Determination
I keep thinking there's a reason it hasn't been changed yet - maybe an admin had a really good reason for keeping it that way? But I can't recall exactly what that reason is. I'm thinking we should perhaps ask an admin to make an official ruling before we do something. No point in making changes if someone's just going to undo our hard work, eh? Twocents 19:10, October 3, 2009 (UTC)

RE:Kisuke's New Move
I already took care of it before you said anything, but thanks.Salubri 22:25, October 8, 2009 (UTC)

hey
been awhile since you posted on my forum just thought i'd leave a message and see what u where up to.Soul reaper magnum 22:10, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

alright thanks i'll have to check them out and i'll see what i can do with my page later. and as a side note if you have any ideas about other stuff you can put it on my forum even if it's not about vizard mask's or shisai's. just to see what you,me,and anybody else can come up with.Soul reaper magnum 15:59, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

i did a few things to my page. i'm not to good at this sort of thing but what do you think?Soul reaper magnum 16:00, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

k,thanks.Soul reaper magnum 18:46, October 11, 2009 (UTC)

RE:Question
i don't think they are Vasto Lorde. i was thinking that Wonderweiss was an attempt at Aizen trying to get a vasto lorde in his army. and if you think about it since they are the most powerful hollows they might not want to work for Aizen. it wouldn't surprise me if they try to kill him when they appear.Soul reaper magnum 08:46, October 12, 2009 (UTC)

new movie
any idea if there's going to be a new bleach movie this year?

what i meant was if you heard anything about a new one in japan. i'v noticed that the last three all came out in December of each year. and i'v all ready seen the dubbed second movie on youtube.Soul reaper magnum 20:45, October 13, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Momo's pic
I'm not sure how yet, since cropping can cause issues, but I'll try something. Arrancar109 06:27, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

what did Arrancar109 say? (I just got that! She's a Privaron Espada!)

thanks so much for this and for agreeing with me. Why does Arrancar109 think he has the right to change anything on this wikia, though? he's not the boss! Oh and also, another person who agrees with me that her name is Hallibel! Yay!

still it pisses me off when he deletes something useful from the pages I edit with no reason! it's not far! (yes, it actually IS "Hallibel" It said so on my DVR's closed captioning!) well anyway, g2g, see ya next week! I get to see my boyfriend next week!!! (yes, I'm gay!)

Response
Yeah, my response may have been a bit blunt to seem rude (which was not my intention), but what I said is essentially true. If we did correct Kubo's Spanish mistakes, then the entire wiki would have to go through an overhaul, as there are a lot of Spanish mistakes, not just this one. For example, Chad's Brazo Izquierda del Diablo and Brazo Derecha de Gigante should actually be Brazo Izquierdo del Diablo and Brazo Derecho de Gigante, and Ulquiorra's Cero Oscuras should be Cero Oscuro. We've established that we're not going to correct or alter Kubo's writings, as it would be inconsistent to what he actually wrote. Arrancar109 22:54, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Image Protection
I'm seriously considering protect existing images from "updated" versions, since:
 * A: 9 times out of 10, the updated images suck in comparison to the ones they're trying to replace.
 * B: The wiki system itself is glitched and attempts to restore old versions end horribly, as either the image gets screwed up, the thumbnail gets screwed up, or in most cases, both get screwed up.

Of course, the notable person who seems to ignore this is User:KariyaJin, and I have talked to him about it, but I'm not going to block him, since he really didn't do anything wrong. I can understand the need to update the images, but they aren't always good updates. But opinions vary, so I won't take action against him.

Before I get too much off-topic, I can't protect profile images if people are going to use images of a different name to change them. It would require protecting the article in general, and I can't do that if the article isn't under sort of problem that's getting out of hand (though I do admit that the "update images" thing is beginning to annoy me; still not good enough to protect an article though). Arrancar109 23:31, October 14, 2009 (UTC)

RE:Determination
Personally I took issue with that being under powers and abilities when it was put in. Determination is an effect of his personality not a ability or power. Otherwise every character would have it under their article. I say scrape it altogether and if not it should likely be placed under the personality section. Ichigo's page is a mess anyhow and i doubt I'll get around to it anytime as it requires to much work, alongside, Rukia, Renji Salubri 06:15, October 15, 2009 (UTC)

Ichigo
Sorry to butt in. But absolutely, positively not! I believe the Ichigo article already has a line or two on how many of the female characters seem to be attracted to Ichigo. That's enough. Calling him attractive and phrasing it the way you phrased is to fandomish. I would revert something like that on sight as well. It's a fairly redundant statement since the essence of it has been captured already within Ichigo's article. When Yyp has time to reply, I hope he will agree with me. Tinni 16:09, October 15, 2009 (UTC)

I'd suggest you run it passed one of the admins, though I feel that the exact wording for what you want to add would need to be chosen very carefully. Not sure what section it should go in either, as romantic feelings & attractive are two different things, with only the latter meriting a mention in the appearance section. If Renji did indeed say such a thing, then maybe it could go in, though you would need to reference it. PS: didn't see Tinni's comment, but I agree with him. And if it already mentioned in the article, then there's no need to add it again. --Yyp 16:09, October 15, 2009 (UTC)

No problem. The admins are Whitestrike, Arrancar109 and Salubri. --Yyp 20:15, October 15, 2009 (UTC)

Spur of the moment
Hi thanks for the response but the spur of the moment thing is more of a personality thing isn't it and i'm pretty sure something was written about him being reckless the spur part can be added after that but like salubri said his page needs a lot of work and it's not really up to us.--SalmanH 19:04, October 15, 2009 (UTC)


 * For me, I don't like to make mistakes, and another one I have noticed is that the word "Giralda", Dordonii's Resurección, is not a real spanish word. I have researchwed it, and it doesn't translate to anything.

forum
have you checked out the forum about ichigo's new mask? i was going to wright about it myself but some one beat me to it.Soul reaper magnum 14:01, October 16, 2009 (UTC)

Re: Espada Status
I wasn't bothered by it, but I was just asking Arrancar109 to see if it's true or not. I have some of my own details and facts about some of the Espada's status. I just wanted to know if I could put them up or not. --Oblivion1 19:39, October 16, 2009 (UTC)Oblivion1

Cool, thanks for the welcome!! But my only problem in the watercooler, is there are too many hard-boiled people who are too stubborn and won't change there minds regardless of what information there is. I would feel like I was wasting my time talking to a solid concrete wall. I'm kind of hoping I can talk to Arrancar109 about some of the changes, so that way he wouldn't have to go back and change them himself. But, again, that's me hoping. --Oblivion1 00:03, October 17, 2009 (UTC)Oblivion1

Dang!!! You're kidding!!! I knew there were some people who had some wild speculations, But that one about tops the cake... That's pretty bad. MY POINT PROVEN!!! --Oblivion1 00:51, October 17, 2009 (UTC)Oblivion1

Ha, I just read the conversation you had with him. Kinda interesting. I really REALLY wonder where he got those ideas from. The manga, I thought, was pretty clear on how Ichigo got his inner hollow, and that he is indeed a Vizard.(Though, is growing far beyond the level of the other Vizards) --Oblivion1 01:12, October 17, 2009 (UTC)Oblivion1

Re: Arrancar Saga/arc
I know, I'm not the guy you went to for this, but considering how much subsections each story saga was divided into, it would be better if we stuck to the current system. I'm not sure if there's a real difference between "Arc" and "Saga", but to avoid confusion, and HUGELY written sections in character articles, we should probably just keep the title as "Arrancar Saga", as I forsee we'd have to find a different way to modify the Synopsis sections in each of the character articles, and that might take too much time. Arrancar109 00:12, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

Re:Wonderweiss: Vasto Lordes
I'll do that. now i just have to find a way to wright it.Soul reaper magnum 20:01, October 17, 2009 (UTC)

RE: Espada:Vasto Lordes
I can't be too sure, but I don't believe any arrancar we've seen up to now, is a VL.(including Wonderwiess) I base this opinion mainly on the fact that their numbers are supposed to be very few.(10 or less) And that they're supposed to be more powerful than a shinigami Captain. Though this detail is very vague given that the power of Captains go from fairly pathetic, to almost god-like.

Wonderweiss is a topic I've seen a lot, and I know the evidence "for" him being a VL. (His size before he became an arrancar, his power despite not being an Espada etc. etc.) But I don't he is one otherwise I think one of the other Espada or arrancar would've mentioned it.(Especially those with a much more arrogant and boastful attitude) Also, every logical argument "for" him being a VL, I've seen a logical counter-argument "against" him being a VL. So it's hard to tell.

The other top Espada I don't believe were, because the power they displayed, and the point of which we're at in the story. Ulquiorra's second release can be explained as simply a higher level in power. Yammy is self explanatory by what he does (He eats and sleeps, and gets stronger) and Barragan seemed to just have a very unique and powerful ability. The only ones I could "vaguely" say might be, are Harribel and Stark. Because I don't believe they showed what they can really do, and I think their powers have the greatest potential for development than any of the others.

I'm not saying any of this is absolute. No one can say anything for a fact from the very little information we have gotten about the VL. The only way I believe we'll know for certain is by either verbal or "clear" visual confirmation. --Oblivion1 01:34, October 18, 2009 (UTC)Oblivion1

Mayuri - zanpakuto
No problem. Zan' is just my short-hand for Zanpakuto. I get too lazy to write the whole word sometimes, especially when I'm repeating it several times in a short space. --Yyp 20:06, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately there is no way of knowing if any admins are online, as there is no online status thing on the wiki. I suggest posting on Arrancar109 or Salubri's pages to ask about it, as there is no other way of knowing if they're online. WhiteStrike (the other admin) doesn't seem to have been online much recently. Otherwise, talk it out on the Hollow Ichigo Talk Page, and get other people's opinion on it and see if we can come to a general consensus, rather than having an edit war. My personal opinion is that the arm was ripped off (I know he had the sword, but he wasn't shown to have used it and I don't see why he would grab Ulquiorra's arm in order to cut it off. It seems to be more efficient to cut it off straight away, rather than giving Ulquiorra time to react.) --Yyp 21:18, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

Regarding the arm thing
I agree with you. I also don't care much about if got his arm plucked/cut as for what really happened and what should be documented in this wiki. As of right now it's too vague to say what happened either way because I don't know what verb Ulquiorra used exactly [in Japanese] when he was talking about his regeneration abilities his arm in chapter 351. I believe that will help to make things clearer unless of course it gives an indefinite meaning and can be translated either way. Let's just hope that is not the case. MasterDeva 21:53, October 18, 2009 (UTC)

From what i can see Ichigo does have his sword in hand and Ulquirra does loose a arm to him those are facts, whether or not it was cut off or ripped off can't be known as its not shown all you see is the arm coming off and in the part of the scene you dont see the sword, which maybe obscured behind his back. In any case it would seem to fit that it was ripped off as there is nothing to prove that it was cut off with the sword. Stating that he was holding the sword is not the same as stating that he actually used it to cut the arm off which cant be clear. What we do know is that from what is shown it appears that it may have been ripped off by sheer strength alone (logically for the purpose of showing the strength of the new transformation).Salubri 00:03, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

It's OK really. If anything I thought that we could use "Ulquiorra lost/loses his arm" until the specific anime episode aired on TV if we didn't come to an agreement. I can also understand that making multiple edits every day in the wiki can be a bit tiring and send you to overdrive, it's not that we actually got into a fight just stated different opinions. Don't worry about it. By the way what do you think of my reasoning regarding the issue!? I think it doesn't break any of the laws in Kubo's universe and I worded it as best as I could. Just wanting to hear/read your opinion on this one, as the epilogue, it really interests me. MasterDeva 23:17, October 21, 2009 (UTC)

Trivia section
Firstly, thanks for helping out in the campaign to rid the wiki of junk trivia. Secondly, >.< I mercilessly removed all but two of the original trivia from Ikkaku's page and dumped them in the talk page. They are all junk and I can't think of anyone who might find any of it useful. But people have a chance to explain in the talk page and if no one gives a good explanation well they will stay gone. I'll do something similar with Yumichika's page. So don't hesitate to mass remove most trivia and just dump them in the talk page with a message saying "This is junk but if you don't think so, please explain". Tinni 01:35, October 19, 2009 (UTC)

Censorship
I suggest that you revert my forum post back to Superchunky from Denver's revision, as it is a form of online censorship. I believe that you should do it yourself, as you undid a revision to which you had no right to. I also believe that Arrancar109 should have confronted me about it before you deleted it. If you do not, I will go to the authorities: Wikia. Adminhater 03:26, October 21, 2009 (UTC)


 * Naw. Removing vandalism is something we all should be doing if it does come up, so you did the right thing. I should probably do something now, but if he tries it again, that's when I'll do something. Salubri already deleted his forum, but I don't think he banned him, so I'm guessing he's not expected to come back. If he does post something as an attack on another user (seems to be me in this case), then I'll do something about it. Arrancar109 05:55, October 21, 2009 (UTC)