Board Thread:Improvements and Issues/@comment-38534384-20190505131246/@comment-38534384-20190505160950

My mistake, I meant to say 4'9" and I meant to say divide by 30.48 which equals 1 foot entirely. 150 divided by 30.48 is indeed 4 feet 9 inches, as no one grows to an even height perfectly. Using the traditional method of measuring height is inconsistent for the metrics system as it's more precise and accurate. When being precise about the height itself, she indeed fits 4'9". Even the conversion table for centimeters isn't a whole number. I'm just being sensible about the measurement of 150 centimeters flat. It's also common to use division of 30.48 cm to find the height of something from cms to feet. Most places don't use inches, some use meters, and some use feet and inches together. For example, I am 176 centimeters, and on the conversion chart, it'd be considered 5'9". But when solved through division, it's actually over 5 feet 7 inches, or 69 inches tall. You can see for yourself if you'd like, the conversion chart is off with it's measurements of height and length.