User talk:Godisme

Welcome
Welcome to Bleach Wiki! Thanks for your edit to Izuru Kira page, and thanks for joining our community! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.


 * Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help.


 * Questions? You can ask on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!


 * Need help? You can find it right here! You can also find a full list of help pages here.


 * Don't know what to do? The Community Portal has an outline of the site, and has links to pages to get you started!


 * Please sign in every time you edit, so that we can recognize you!


 * Here are some more pages you might find useful:


 * Policy - follow this to ensure harmony on the wiki
 * Manual of Style - a guide to how articles here are organized and written
 * Spoiler Policy - follow this to not ruin upcoming stories for those yet to read or watch the new chapter or episode


 * Sign your name in discussions by typing ~ , which automatically adds your signature and the date, so we know who's talking!

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Salubri (Talk) 16:20, June 6, 2009

ROFL
ROFL @ Harribel/Starrk comment.Blackcero 19:39, September 27, 2009 (UTC)

LOL
"Yo Harribel,Im happy for you and Imma Let you finish but Starrk had one of the best deaths of all time, of all time. Just saying." Hilarious!!!

Featured Article Vote
Please note that as set out in the Voting Policy, only users who have contributed to the wiki's articles in the month of the vote will have their vote counted. So unless you help improve the articles (perhaps you could help fix the errors you claim to have spotted on Matsumoto's page), it will remain in the deleted votes section. -- Yyp (Talk) 21:52, March 26, 2010 (UTC)


 * I did not remove it the second time - Salubri did. He obviously felt that it was not enough at the time. We're going on the basis of a minimum of 5 edits to articles in the month. -- Yyp (Talk) 08:24, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

A minimum of 5 per month each month not counting forums, blogs or featured pages for voting. As of last month you have 2 and prior to your actual vote you had 2 this month. Having no intention of editing beyond that until it affected your ability to vote. Besides the fact that you choose a page under an extreme changes because its severely lacking in a article page, something you acknowledge. The problem is you know that as well as you know only admin can touch the page currently. Most of the reasons your describe hold no weight as to why his page should be picked no editor will be touching the page in the next month and its failings are far greater then the page your opposed to. Legitimate reasoning is better then only picking one page cause you cant't choose another.Salubri (Talk)  23:59, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Its a vote on those featured recently not on any character. If it was allowed for any character it would actually promotes only voting for your favorite rather then a good article. Every voter would only vote for their favorites every time. People don't have to vote nor do they have to opposes any article. Its more about your reasoning which is why we have a policy on votes to eliminate favorite character voting. The biggest issue is your lacking in edits in feb. so whether you allowed to vote based on that ill leave it up to Yyp. But as it stands the reasoning you probably should change up. Alot isn't gonna be presented in Rangiku's page bit what is known is there, the fact being her's in fact is complete compared to Ichigo's so the comparison you have been drawing isn't accurate besides grammar which is true of any article. Salubri (Talk)  00:38, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Looking at your contributions list, you now have 11 edits to articles this month, each of which seems good. That's good enough for me to allow you to vote this month. However, the reasons you stated for Ichigo would need to be changed, as the page will not be open to general editors until the overhaul of it is complete (and that is quite some way off, as it is missing massive amounts of information and nearly the entire plot section up to chapter 379 is unreferenced, as are the Bount & Amagai anime arcs). -- Yyp (Talk) 09:43, March 29, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Signature
It's nothing all that special, we just added the colours in the wiki code in the signature text box. So for me the full code is Tinni   (Talk)  You can change things like colour and font by modifying the relevant bits. Hope that helps. Tinni  (Talk)  01:13, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Signature
If you haven't already found it, I have a link that might help, here it is - Help:Color. WhiteArmor 03:49, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Okay, awesome signature BTW. WhiteArmor 03:55, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Bulky. You can also use just three tidles to make the signature appear w/o the date it was posted, Example:I signed my post this way. WhiteArmor  (Talk)

Re: Isshin
I left it locked once I finished the overhaul of it in order to prevent spoilers and speculation being added to the page. It should be unprotected once chapter 398 is released. Whether it stays that way or not is another story. Too many people making too many changes in a short time can be quite disruptive and unhelpful, which I think is why it got locked in the first place. So don't be surprised if it is locked again to allow a cooling off period. With a bit of luck though (and a clear and unambiguous chapter from Kubo [here's hoping]), we might be able to leave it open this time. -- Yyp (Talk) 18:23, March 31, 2010 (UTC)

Blogs
Yeah i saw that, i wrote on Salubri's comment to Yyp and also i agreed with what you said on his comment to Arrancar. It really is reidiculous what he is suggesting, he shows a basic misunderstanding of the point of a blog section and furthermore he seems to imply what he believes takes precedenece over the many who clearly enjoy the blog section. GinIchimaru 02:31, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah i dont think he likes anyone who hasnt made a billion edits or who isnt an admin much. seems to have abit of a snobbish attitude towars this wikia. which is fine if we were actually hurting the content in anyway, but we arent, we are neatly tucked away in the blogging section. GinIchimaru 02:38, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

I think you strongly misunderstand that their are plenty of sights that offer all the talking needs that you want to engage in. The point of this site is to make a informed site based on Bleach material. In the past couple of hours there is nothing but a wall of blog when there is alot of work to do on the site in general. Now that its under scrutiny its an issue but if the site was all about that it would be bleach blog spot. Its not fair for those who actually do work on the site to have to be on equal footing with those who don't engage in the community work. You feel as though your entitled to do nothing but talk on blog but by policy your supposed to contribute here. As I said there are plenty of sites that cater to that sort of thing. Also no you dont have to have a million edits, but doing edits is the main focus that you have chosen to ignore as well as bad mouth me.Salubri (Talk)  02:53, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Actually I was more referring to GinIchimaru on both the bad mouthing and the lack of edits in general. But as far as your concerned you seem to feel as if I have some hatred for you and its not really that deep. In fact where I could have been a real stickler for the rules I gave leave to let you vote for the featured article and just ask that you ask Yyp to concur. so how you can even say im not fair or respectful and im totalitarian is uncalled for. The Policy (Bleach Wiki:What Bleach Wiki is Not) is very clear on the fact that this is not a social networking site and while the blogs are new within the past year or so, there is a significant problem when work tries to get done and there is nothing but blog comments when there is alot of work to do here. Its not a simple as just taking off them off with a click if that could have been done it would have been. You cant come on the site and remain an island totally unto yourself. This whole conversation you have made it seem talking on blogs is your world. Primarily you are to contribute not spend all day on blogs. There was a user who only came on to work on his page and he got warned by all the admin multiple times for it as he wasn't contributing. It eventually escalated to an issue. Whats worse then that is when your on the blogs and not even talking about serious bleach stuff. As I stated there are plenty of forums for that type of things. So I dont know what to tell you if you feel its totalitarian to ask that you contribute and be apart of the community instead of by majority playing around on a blog as if thats what the main focus here was. Respect the site, trying to sit in your own corner and joke around does not help the site any and is just about the same issue with those who do mess up the articles.Salubri (Talk)  03:23, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

I actually have turned off the blog comments but it is still an issue. I would ask that you think about it because the fact that it was a wall was only part of the issue. Active contributions are still needed and the main focus of the site. Thats really all I had to say on the topic so that you know and are informed. Salubri (Talk)  03:37, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Grammar
If your big on Grammar there are many articles that could probably use some help in that department. If your up for it see about gathering together some others with the same interest. We can work out something so that as a group the articles can get done without putting to much strain on just one or two people. That way all involved can do small or medium edits here and there without getting burned out in the effort. With only one or two people it can be overwhelming and then it never gets done.Salubri (Talk)  20:05, April 1, 2010 (UTC)

Oh I didn't mean multiple people working on one page but rather on various pages. A user to each individual page, just an organized effort when it comes to the group interested in grammar. Salubri (Talk)  20:40, April 1, 2010 (UTC)