Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-25579533-20160911050309/@comment-893506-20160911054149

Except we never make assumptions on articles. And really, the only way we will add as such is if Kubo confirms it via databook at this point.

Do not get me wrong. Everyone pretty much wishes more exposition was given to cover the vague details like this. But there was literally no follow up nor any real indications or implications that would have at least given the audience information.

Could they all be dead? Yes? Could they be alive? Yes. Was there any real evidence produced that could steer us to draw a conclusion as to which scenario has happened? No.

The way this wiki is and always has worked is that we list information based on what was presented, not based on what feelings we have. We do not know if a databook is planned (I'm personally hoping it is), but if it's covered there, then we can go ahead and list details from it on here. But until as such, the articles are staying as is.