User talk:Soulreaper1234





Re: Archive Trouble
I fixed it for you. The reason why it was appearing the way it was is because each paragraph (for some reason) had a spacebar space before you put in text. Let me demonstrate:

This is the way it looks when you begin a paragraph with a spacebar space before the text.

For some reason, when you moved everything, there was a spacebar space at the beginning of each paragraph for each topic on your talk page, which caused it to look like the way it did (as well as my demonstration above). It's fixed now, so it should be fine. Arrancar109 (Talk)  18:56, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Yep. That's all there is too it. Arrancar109 (Talk)  19:05, June 10, 2010 (UTC)

Referencing
As per our manual of style, you must reference all information you add. This is because without references, our readers don't know where the information comes from. We are also trying to get all unreferenced information off the wiki. That will not be possible if new unreferenced information keeps getting added. Arrancar109 is particularly strict about these things. As you might have noticed. Please use the following codes to add references. Let me know if you have any more questions about referencing. Tinni  (Talk)  14:22, June 11, 2010 (UTC)


 * Anime reference example:
 * Manga reference example:

If you are just editing existing information, then no there is no need to add references. However, if you come across a piece of information that is not referenced. Then we would really appreciate it if you would kindly add the reference while correct grammer/spelling. Tinni  (Talk)  15:13, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

No that is not necessary. Especially for things like plot information that come straight out of the manga chapter or anime. Powers/abilities tend to be more contentious, or rather how they are to be described can be contentious. But you should still feel free to go ahead and add new information as best you can. The trick is to not assume or speculate. Just write down things as you see them in the chapter/anime and add the reference. If there is a problem, someone else will go in and fix it/expand on the information or just bring-up a discussion in the discussion page. But certainly don't hesitate to add information. Also, I have noticed that you have been attempting to write chapter summaries but then getting nervous and reverting what you added. You don't have to be so nervous. If there is a problem with the summary we'll fix it. So you should just leave it in there. Tinni  (Talk)  15:34, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

That's what I am here for. Which reminds me, please be aware that we have a zero tolerance policy towards verbal harassment and we require cooperation from all users to keep the wiki abuse free. I noticed that you posted on the Blog where Arrancarthevillainiam cursed at another user and called them names, after he did the cursing. The offending posts have now been removed but please keep in mind that if in the future if you notice comments like "f--- you", name calling like "pr---k" or "m-g---t" and other such vile personal attacks, report them to the admins immediately whether they are directed at you or another user. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. Tinni   (Talk)  15:51, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

Things involving me doesn't matter. When I am right, I am right and no amount of ganging-up will help anyone or rattle me. However, as a frequent Blog user, you should keep your eyes and ears open for harassment, abuse and other unsocial behaviour on blogs. We can't be everywhere and the blogs are becoming a problem. Discussions can get heated, harsh comments can be exchanged and some people just have a direct, cynical way of expressing their opinion (I should know, I am one of them), that's all acceptable. But the moment someone makes a discussion personal and starts calling another user names or targets them in a malicious manner or otherwise gives the impression of harassment - the best way you can help the wiki community is to head for the nearest admin's talk page and linking to the blog and explaining what the problem is. In short, if you see something, speak-up. Tinni  (Talk)  17:00, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

Yes Kaien was older then Byakuya and Gin. No the Shiba family was the FIFTH Great Noble Family. There are currently four great noble families AFTER the Shiba family fell from grace. Tinni  (Talk)  17:19, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

It is a crack theory until proven otherwise, yes. We may never learn about the other two noble families or maybe we'll learn something about them soon now that the story has moved back to Soul Society. We can only wait and see. Tinni  (Talk)  17:32, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

Re: Aizen's form
I don't think it is so much that he wanted to become a hollow or whatever but become something new. His form does not really bear any resemblance to a hollow or vizard other than the black sclera. I dont think we can really say anything--God (Pray)  16:33, June 11, 2010 (UTC)

Response
We unfortunately have been down that road before. That system really wouldn't work. Mainly because there are a number of things that users would bring up and it would be overwhelming. Also information isn't based on personal opinion. What one person believes or thought happened is gonna be entirely different from what another person thinks. This is the result of alot vandalism on the sight that has to be fixed. The point is being impartial about the material and only placing what is seen or heard in the manga and by extension in the anime. Prime example if Ulquiorra states he is dying and fades to dust in the wind there is no debating the fact that he is dead. Such things would not contribute to the sight but cause an issue. Im not sure how this would help the sight, maybe im missing the point what exactly are you trying for with this implementation? --Salubri (Talk)  14:01, June 22, 2010 (UTC)

I get what your saying but alot of the issues of what is and isn't allowed are already in the policies. There should be no reason not to read them and everyone is held to the standard so people don't get to slide just cause they choose not to. The links for the pages are even automatically placed on the talk pages when people sign in. Its a fact of being part of the sight you got to follow the policies. There wouldn't be a need to do all you suggest if they were followed. Also as admin there is alot to do on this site everyday thats not counting real life. We wouldn't have time to actually go over and monitor and control all that on top of what we already do. Hence why we decided against doing a chat for the sight as well. I set up the vote to make a clear point about something serious for the entire wiki and also to explain the majority view of the sight to an outsider. What exactly would you have people bring up. Salubri (Talk)  14:37, June 22, 2010 (UTC)