Bleach Wiki talk:Image Gallery

Picture Change Guidelines
As per the Image Policy, nominate and discuss changes to the profile pictures of the character articles here and only here. The typical requirements for a profile picture are that it shows the character facing forward, in their typical attire and should not be battle-worn. They should be centered, have good lighting, and be of good quality. Candidates also must have valid and complete and  templates attached to them or else they will be rejected.

Votes
How to vote:

{|align=right


 * }


 * Vote by typing either of the following in the relevant sections:

Only one "Support" vote per user. Votes will be open only for a week of the initial pic being placed. At the end of the week the highest rated pic will win. If no pick is a clear winner, than an admin with pick the pic. If another pic is brought up after the picture is picked then the voting begins again with the pic that has already been picked and the new pic or pics.

Zangetsu
So, as you might know, the anime decided to pointlessly give Zangetsu yellow eyes instead of his original white ones. Normally it's a minor issues (unlike Nel's or Rangiku's hair colors...) that I wouldn't think is worth changing the profile pic for. Unfortunately several newcomers have over the times insisted on changing the description of Zangetsu to the anime version; and now apparently one of them decided to complain there's an editing dispute... Tl;dr how about giving Zangetsu an accurate manga profile pic? Timjer (talk) 15:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) So far, as proposer. Timjer (talk) 15:34, 7 June 2022 (UTC)

I do support this, since I think the profile image should include as many accurate elements as possible (hair, eye, even tongue color), but I've tacked on an additional option that better fits our usual profile image template - no intense lines, no gaping mouth, etc. Downside is it's not quite as big, but it'll still meet the size requirements for the template.--Xilinoc (talk) 17:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Proposal 2 is my choice - using manga colors is important, especially now that we have access to the colored manga and thus a lot more usable images for profile sections.--Xilinoc (talk) 17:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) I don' t understand why it is being a big deal in most Bleach continuity the anime version is how Zangetsu appears same with Nel and Rangiku. Anyway the original anime has been over for a while now and it is already mentioned on both trivia and description. However, I do understand the other side of this argument so why not add his manga image in his appearance section like what was done with Ukitake's or if not we could just have two tabs for manga and anime for the infobox. I vote for keeping it the way it is and instead either just adding it like I mentioned above.--Tuxedo12 (talk) 20:03, 7 June 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) Proposal 2. I've gotten used to the anime image but keeping consistency with the manga is important.

Loly Aivirrne
Time to ruin this page having 3,636 edits...okay, so the current profile image we use for Loly is much, much better than the abomination that preceded it for so many years (particularly as the latter wasn't cropped to where it is now), but it has one flaw: she's not facing the camera, and it looks pretty weird to have her looking down/to her right instead of directly forward. So, from the same episode, I've found a still of her doing exactly that which is also more easily centered. I think it'll work out.--Xilinoc (talk) 03:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) As proposer.--Xilinoc (talk) 03:22, 24 June 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) Same reasons as Xil. Timjer (talk) 06:15, 24 June 2022 (UTC)

Rangiku Matsumoto
So, I was thinking about adding this image to Rangiku's profile pics. Namely as one of her in the past (similar to what we have for Yamamoto). The only problem I have is that I'm not sure what to call it in the infobox ("younger", "past", etc.). Timjer (talk) 08:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) As proposer. Timjer (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) oh hey, that's what I added it for lol. Anyway, supported, and I was thinking of calling it "past".--Xilinoc (talk) 15:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Isshin Kurosaki
Similar idea as with Rangiku above. Timjer (talk) 08:34, 25 June 2022 (UTC)


 * 1) As proposer. Timjer (talk) 08:24, 25 June 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Also as "past".--Xilinoc (talk) 15:15, 25 June 2022 (UTC)

Cataloging
Place any images that are to be cataloged in the Image Galleries here.

New wiki background and possible logo changes
I was playing around with some of the Burn the Witch assets I found and made some new wiki background concepts. I made a background, a "header banner" and a new logo. Do you guys like any of the new concepts?

-- 16:11, August 24, 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) Been wanting a new header banner for a while now but the editor kept glitching so I never got to fool around with it - your proposal looks great. Same with the new logo and background, as much as I love the final arc and as much as our current logo has grown on me, right now it's BTW time (I'd be open to bringing back this BG when the anime starts airing again, though, then maybe capping it all off with a "dual banner" of Ichigo/Rukia/Noel/Ninny after it's all said and done).--Xilinoc (talk) 16:29, August 24, 2020 (UTC)

Yeah I’m open for a “dual background” and I would have done one, but there isn’t any key art for the anime yet, so I think this will do fine for the moment. -- 16:37, August 24, 2020 (UTC)

Support the wordmark and banner, but not the background. Its time for a change I think, but it should be the characters and it should include proper Bleach characters first and foremost. While its only right that BtW be acknowledged since its the only new content right now, it shouldnt supersede the original which is 95%+ of what the wiki is about. 09:12, August 25, 2020 (UTC)


 * Agree with Yyp. I support the wordmark and banner as well. While I admit the proposed background looks awesome, it kinda detracts from the fact that this wiki is still primarily about Bleach, not its spinoff. Timjer (talk) 09:23, August 25, 2020 (UTC)


 * Fair points, both of you. I'll try making a background to satisfy all parties later, but for now I say move ahead with the logo and background.--Xilinoc (talk) 11:50, August 25, 2020 (UTC)

I can refine the logo a bit (I was doing it on the fly) and move on using the header if all parties agree.-- 20:33, August 25, 2020 (UTC)

I created another logo concept -- 20:08, August 26, 2020 (UTC)

Managed to add the banner pic. Took a surprising amount of cropping, resizing to get it positioned right. Im sure itll surprise nobody that it doesnt show up on the Discussion page... 14:02, October 15, 2020 (UTC)