User talk:Darknesslover5000

Welcome
Hi, welcome to Bleach Wiki! Thanks for your edit to the Image:New mask.jpeg page.

Here's a wiki tip for you -- you can sign your name on talk/discussion pages by typing ~ which automatically adds your signature and the date.

Check out Help:Contents for more tricks. Also, remember that a wiki is a community, and that you'll almost always find someone to help you if you're having problems. Don't hesitate to ask for help! ;)

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Arrancar109 (Talk) 05:44, 22 March 2009

Just so you know
That wasn't me who left that message; it's actually a Wikia bot of sorts. It leaves me as the signer, for some reason. Arrancar109 05:47, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Vasto Lorde Ichigo
Well, firstly, it was written in a way where it seems like it implies Ichigo to be a Vasto Lorde. Granted, that was likely not your intention, but that's one of the rumors that needs to be dispelled, since technically, Ichigo's Hollow form is not even a Gillian. Secondly, as discussed very heavily on Hollow Ichigo's talk page (and/or on our Watercooler forum), it was never actually confirmed if we saw a Vasto Lorde-level Hollow/Arrancar or not. Yes, it is very well implied that Ulquiorra is a Vasto Lorde, and many fans (myself included) believe that the current top 4 Espada are made up of Vasto Lorde Arrancar, but if you really look at it, neither Tite Kubo nor the Anime really confirmed that Stark, Barragan, Halibel, and Ulquiorra are Vasto Lorde Hollows; we only assumed so. We don't know the full extent of a Vasto Lorde's power as of yet, because we haven't been confirmed to see one as of yet; there's only speculation that the top 4 Espada are Vasto Lordes. Arrancar109 22:38, 22 March 2009 (UTC)

Your Votes in Featured Quote
Hi. You have voted a total of five times on the Featured Quote page. As set out in our Voting Policy (please familiarize yourself with it if you have not already done so) and indeed on the vote page itself, users are allowed to cast one "Support" vote and one "Oppose" vote only. You have clearly exceeded this limit, and as set out in the policy, your votes have been moved to the deleted votes section. You are welcome to cast a new (and correct) vote, but you must stay within the rules. Thank you. --Yyp 11:13, November 26, 2009 (UTC)

Found at last......
Darknesslover? What happened to you?--Nanohano 01:30, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

The banning--Nanohano 02:41, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Ichigo
I know who used the black getsugo first but I am still not allowing that sentence in. If you have to use the word assumed, then you are speculation. In fact, allow me to highlight all the words that make the sentence you wrote speculation. In fact, if you read the sentence you wrote back yourself, you'll see that as it is presented. It is in fact speculation. Tinni  (Talk)  10:47, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

The black Getsuga Tenshō is assumed to be an invention of Hollow Ichigo, and this may be true, as during the fight with Byakuya Kuchiki, Ichigo used an attack the looked almost like the original Getsuga, and didn't use it's black variant until after Hollow Ichigo used it.

PS. If you really wish to say something about Black Getsuga being Hollow Ichigo's invention, you can do so but you have to reference it to episode 121 where Ichigo says the black getsuga was originally hollow Ichigo's technique AND not make the sentence sound speculative. If you do that, I have no problems with you putting the sentence in. Otherwise it stays out. Tinni  (Talk)  10:51, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

For your benefit I have found the relevant clip for you on youTube. A bit you are looking for happens 57 seconds in. This is keeping with my new policy of helping people edits wiki better as opposed to just fixing things because the latter doesn't teach anything. Please remember to use proper referencing style for anime episodes. Thank you. Tinni  (Talk)  11:05, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

ptk6zsOwv2M

Per the manual of styles referencing section, the anime references take the form. Tinni  (Talk)  11:19, January 2, 2010 (UTC)

Talk pages
Talk pages are not forums. The topic you posted on Starrk's page had nothing to do with this article and has therefore been removed. You can find it in Forum:Coyote_Starrk_and_Lilynette_Gingerback. Tinni  (Talk)  02:36, July 9, 2010 (UTC)