User talk:Aizen sorrow z

Welcome
Welcome to Bleach Wiki! Thanks for your edit to Forum:4th Bleach Movie page, and thanks for joining our community! There's a lot to do around here, so I hope you'll stay with us and make many more improvements.


 * Recent changes is a great first stop, because you can see what pages other people have been editing, and where you can help.


 * Questions? You can ask on the "discussion" page associated with each article, or post a message on my talk page!


 * Need help? You can find it right here! You can also find a full list of help pages here.


 * Don't know what to do? The Community Portal has an outline of the site, and has links to pages to get you started!


 * Please sign in every time you edit, so that we can recognize you!


 * Here are some more pages you might find useful:


 * Policy - follow this to ensure harmony on the wiki
 * Manual of Style - a guide to how articles here are organized and written
 * Spoiler Policy - follow this to not ruin upcoming stories for those yet to read or watch the new chapter or episode


 * Sign your name in discussions by typing ~ , which automatically adds your signature and the date, so we know who's talking!

Please leave a message on my talk page if I can help with anything! -- Salubri (Talk) 05:17, December 25, 2009

Re: Tosen
sigh Dude that wall of text actually hurt my eyes. There is such a thing as paragraphing and up until now both of us had been paragraphing and put spaces between our points. Why you mashed everything together this time is beyond me but that's what happened and it's too early in the morning for me to deal with that. But if it makes you feel better then go ahead and think you "won". But as far as I am concerned, what you proved was that fans made erroneous assumptions about power-levels and not to mention look down compulsively on the power of Vice-captains. Tinni  (Talk)  01:32, December 27, 2009 (UTC)

Clearly you think very highly of yourself. In addition, my point regarding Bleach fans were that some of them are too prone to assumptions and speculations and then getting angry at the development in the story because they contradict their assumptions and speculation. I am not describing all Bleach fans, merely making an observation about some of the fans I have encountered. That is all. Tinni  (Talk)  02:12, December 27, 2009 (UTC)

An apology! Now that is amusing. Well please do keep expecting it. Tinni  (Talk)  03:09, December 27, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry to interject but Hisagi was capable of beating tosen because the guy wasn't using his reiatsu to "see" which in my own opinion seems similar to sonar or if we're talking in bleach terms Prequisa he was using normal sight and he was overconfident focusing too much on his own power an Komamaru. Hisagi was very weak from his battles thus barely noticable I don't think that a professional like Taito (Tite) would make an impossible situation like that, on a last note you should really sign your posts people get annoyed if you don't by which i mean sysops.-- SalmanH  (Talk)  19:00, December 27, 2009 (UTC)

like someone already said this is for the curious that are looking at my page a fact is something that has been stated previously, since the things i said are quotes they are facts (mostly) that someone wants to reject them or say that never happened well its fine as i am not gonna look for them again i have to many other animes to watch and they are long naruto, one piece, katekyo hitman, zatch bell, etc. also facts can be made trough observations, example: ururu has never fought against a shinigami but taking the fact that she could force an arrancar to release his resurrecion and that renji was surprised at her strength it is quite obvious that she is much stronger than a normal shinigami, making this almost as reliable as a fact even tough it has never been proven in a real battle

like wise i got somereally non-sense battle comparisons that someone told me like yamataro could defeat yammi, in a battle between these two hanataro probably wouldnt even get to fight as the spiritual pressure yammi has is huge especially in his resurrecion form as he needs to gather around double his already huge reiatsu meaning that with his spiritual pressure hanataro would just colapse, and this is not speculation as that happened when hanataro encountered kenpachi (wich had on his eyepatch seal)even if hanataro did manage to not be crushed by his spiritual power he would not gather enough energy in his shikai to kill yammi as ichigos getsuga tensho was not enough to seriously damage yammi another awful battle comparation: ichigo vs momo in a fair head-on battle ichigo would win without having to use his sword as he is faster than any vice-captain even in his shikai, by the time she said a kido spell or released her sword she would already be hit, not to mention that ichigos spiritual pressure is huge, more than twice a captains he could just unleash his reiatsu and do what yamamoto did to nanao and beat her with spiritual pressure, considering this where a one on one battle without her given like a kilometer distance to cast a binding kido spell or sneak attacking him in other words if the battle was fair she would not make even ichigo use his sword to attack

Blog
You're not in any trouble over it, but regarding your blog User blog:Aizen sorrow z/ESPADA VS CAPTAINS, please don't write all in capital letters like that. It is the Internet's equivalent of shouting, not to mention it makes it harder to read. -- Yyp  (Talk)  13:37, December 27, 2009 (UTC)

Signing Your Posts
Hi. Please remember to sign your posts on Talk Pages (& forums), so that other people can tell who you are. It is a fundamental part of discussions on wikis and is stated in several of our Official Policies, as well as in the welcome message you received. Also, do not remove content from a Talk Page. You may strike it through by adding the tags, but do not remove it (the exception being to remove abusive or threatening comments, or anything else which breaches our policies - which should be reported to an admin). -- Yyp  (Talk)  11:31, December 28, 2009 (UTC)


 * You seem to have not noticed or chosen to ignore my previous message. Do not remove content from a Talk Page. It is in violation of the User Page Policy. And please remember to sign your posts (if you are unsure how to, it is explained in the welcome message above). This is your second warning. I suggest you familiarize yourself with our policies if you have not already done so. -- Yyp  (Talk)  22:29, December 28, 2009 (UTC)


 * Aside from being disrespectful to the person who posted the message, it can be seen as an attempt to silence other users. And as stated in the Bleach Wiki:User Page Policy, "removing content (in particular criticism) is viewed as an attempt to whitewash your reputation and it demonstrates an unwillingness to comply with the rules". -- Yyp  (Talk)  22:44, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure what you are on about, but I (and the other admins) all archive our talk pages periodically. The policies are all accessible through the sidebar, under the community heading, but you should have no problem if you do not remove anything, (side note: if you think there is something that merits being removed, its best to ask an admin first, so that we can look into whether any action needs to be taken against the person who posted it) and are calm/civil in all discussions. -- Yyp  (Talk)  23:20, December 28, 2009 (UTC)


 * Sorry for the delay, I was dealing with something else and didn't want to leave it until I had finished, as I have little time left here tonight. I don't know what or who exactly you are referring to, but perhaps you should take it up with the person you seem so hesitant to name. What one person considers alright, might still be judged inappropriate by another, and in that case Admins make the final judgement on it. If it was an Admin's page that you posted on, then that admin, would be entitled to exercise their own judgement on whether or not to remove it. I don't know, as I do not know the details nor what that admin's thought of your comment were. Only they do. -- Yyp   (Talk)  00:16, December 29, 2009 (UTC)