Bleach Wiki talk:Chronology Project

Time Skip
Quick question, should we add years, since the time skip. I am assuming that all of the events in the main bleach storyline up to chapter 423 take place in 2001, so now in the bleach storyline it should be exactly April 14, 2003. Should we update this. --Lemursrule (talk) 02:42, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

Hmm... good point. I think we will have to restructure the "present" section entirely and divide it up according to Ichigo's school year. You know, "1st year of high school" and "3rd/final year of high school". But I am open to suggestions. Tinni  (Talk)  09:32, October 30, 2010 (UTC)

May I Please Join?
I don't know if you have to ask to join, but may I please join? ♥Phoenix feather!♥  21:07, February 20, 2011 (UTC)

Two separate timelines
Hey its been awhile since I have even touched this, but after hearing the possibility of starting the project again had me starting to think, "Why don't we have two timelines, one for manga time and one for anime time." I started to think "well maybe because of the Amagai and Zanpakuto arcs it is nearly impossible to do that?" Then I further thought "well, why don't we have a manga timeline, an anime timeline that includes anime-only time differences (ex. Episode 1 taking course over a day and a half, whereas in the manga it is one day) and the Bount and Regai (groans) arcs, and alternative timelines for the Amagai and Zanpakuto arcs?" Tell me what you guys think. -- 19:40, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * Hmmm I see what you are thinking the only thing IS that When Ichigo went to and returned from Hueco Mundo, things changed like in his mask that is obviously not represented in Amagai Arc and Muramasa Arc, I think because of that I hate them more plus the awful characters!! Anyway, so if had a Manga-only timeline, and an Anime-Only timeline should it leave out the manga parts in the Anime-only just including major instances like saving Rukia, like a bracketed branch of Hueco Mundo and FKT Arcs?? See its difficult to see for sure and obviously you will get the over the top members that might start picking at things!! But I think this could work but on separate pages or, tabs at the top??
 * I think the idea could work so long as they are clearly separated. The problem of course lies in the Amagai and Zanpakuto arcs where they don't really happen anywhere and likely could only be chronicled in a days since start format. That said, I am not opposed to doing so, we just need to settle on how to do it first.--

Perhaps we can have one titled on the lines of "Main Anime Storyline" and another named "Manga Storyline." Perhaps we could label the Amagai and Zanpakuto timelines as "Alternatative Universe Storylines." Sorry I am sucky with names right now.Perhaps as Sun stated we could you different tabs." -- 19:55, June 21, 2012 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't call it the "Main Anime Storyline" as the implication there is that it is the main timeline, I would opt for "Main Timeline" being the manga, "Anime Timeline" being the anime and "Alternate Timelines" for the two filler arcs.--

Don't apologize for giving ideas in Lemurs, you're a valued member, your ideas count!! Chin up!! Right at this point there might be three timelines, because if one is just Manga-Only and then Anime-Only, then there will need to be an Alternate Universe one with a name and those can have the arcs the directly conflict with the information in canon due to the Ran'Tao thing and Hueco Mundo thing, we know these cause the disambiguation!! Some anime-only happens in Hueco Mundo as well so this might be the best course of action!!
 * The anime itself covers a lot of the manga, aside from some obvious filler arcs and a few other episodes that conflict the chronology. I think a better alternative for an anime-only timeline would just to list any differences, as Lemurs suggested, because including what's canon also would somewhat rehash the manga-only timeline, if you ask me. Part of me suggests making two timelines, one purely about the manga and the other on the filler arcs that aren't consistent with the canon chronology. We can include anime-only events in the Manga Timeline, just mark them as such to let readers know it's not actually canon, if this works out for you guys.


 * I see your objection but there are still events in the arcs that conflict with even the anime-only information and if it's to be an accurate chronological timeline we need to exhaust all possibilities!! :)
 * The problem with that is what Lemurs stated earlier, the anime took some liberties with the timeline itself. Things happen on different days in the anime than in the manga. Sure, there are some definitive dates given but a bunch of others are going to be different in the anime.--
 * That's true. If this can work, maybe for the timelines, have it set up in a similar format as wikitable sortables then? though with something more similar to the toggle feature. One part shows how the manga chronicles the events and another how the anime does, for the canon arcs I mean.

Rukia age
There is an issue with the Hisana and Rukia portion of the project. I know in the manga Rukia gives a figure that would lead one to infer that she is 150 or around that, but that claim after all this time makes little to no sense. It would mean that she is older then Byakuya and that Hisana her older sister was even older. We do know that 110 years ago Byakuya was roughly a teenager, so Rukia would have to be younger then that, about the same age as Renji, Izuru. But older then Momo or Hitsygaya. The problem is that Kubo does storyline without completely planning it out. This was stated in the first chapter without really going into the rest of the Shinigami or the Gotei 13 at the time as they were not placed as existing concepts for some time until the arrival of Renji and Byakuya at the end of the arc. Basically after all this time the figure originally given couldnt possibly be true, otherwise Rukia would have been about 40 when Kaien her mentor became the lieutenant of the 13th Division 110 years ago. --


 * We still don't have a grasp on Shinigami aging. Yes, that figure does seem off when considering all of that, but we still don't know exactly the rate at which Shinigami age as compared to Humans. 40 years of age as a Shinigami could be equivalent to teenager in Human years or even younger. We've always known that Byakuya is one of the younger captains. I don't think we can conclusively say that figure is wrong until we know more about Shinigami aging.--