Forum:Byakuya Kuchiki

This thread is for discussing Byakuya Kuchiki. Any other threads about him that are created outside of this one will be merged into here. Tinni 17:37, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

Byakuya Kuchiki - son of Kōga Kuchiki ?
Could Byakuya Kuchiki be Kōga Kuchiki`s son ?

I am saying this, because in the Bleach wiki entry of Byakuya Kuchiki says : ".... He (Byakuya Kuchiki) would spend countless hours training, in preparation of taking over the leadership of the Kuchiki family and the 6th Division from his grandfather, Ginrei Kuchiki." And also, in the anime , about Kōga Kuchiki is said "...(Kōga Kuchiki)was also a member of the Kuchiki noble family, having married into it." and later the Bleach wiki entry on him states " ... his father-in-law Ginrei ..."Amagai88 16:01, December 16, 2009 (UTC)Amagai88

I am certainly waiting for Byakuya to call Koga "father". I also want to see the face of his mother. She must be so pretty! I also wonder if Kubo is willing to do a omake manga chapter that makes official Koga's relationship to the Kuchiki family. Tinni 17:17, December 16, 2009 (UTC)


 * speaking of Kubo, does he also give ideas to the anime writers, especially this filler? i wish Koga would be a canon character. --WinterFox 03:33, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

I find it difficult to believe that Kubo would let the anime people wildly veer off from his picture of the world he created. Particularly with information as relevant to one of Bleach's most central characters as who Byakuya's father is. This fact may never raise its head in the manga but its still out there in the anime and who would want to create competeting and contradictory storylines? Great Cthulhu 03:48, December 17, 2009 (UTC)


 * Kubo is consulted by the anime studio and Koga may well be a Ashido Kanō, who was originally developed by Kubo to appear in the manga but was dropped due to time issues. Kubo included his development information with manga volume 261. Maybe, he'll do something similar with Koga. Assuming Koga was developed by Kubo and I think he was. He did develop the Zanpakuto spirits, so I don't see why he couldn't have developed Koga at the same time he developed Muramasa. That would be the kind of thing Kubo would do. Tinni 07:29, December 17, 2009 (UTC)


 * I am happy to hear this, Tinni. So, are Koga, Muramasa, Ashido considered or will be considered canon characters already?--WinterFox 23:44, December 17, 2009 (UTC)


 * Firstly, Koga and Muramasa have not made an appearance in the Manga yet, so no they are strictly anime-only. Ashido has information included in his article where we explained that he was developed by Kubo for inclusion in the manga but was dropped due to time issues and that his development material was included in volume 29. As far as the wiki is concerned Ashido is still anime-only. But I know that among fans he is consider quasi-canon as he and and the forest of the menos is part of Kubo's vision for Bleach. But yes, unless Kubo draws it in the manga, it is not canon. Just because Kubo does produce special things for use in other mediums all the time. Like special stories for games. Characters for awful filler arcs like the Bount (just thinking of that arc makes me so angry!!!!). So unless he draws it, it's not canon. Tinni 02:11, December 18, 2009 (UTC)


 * PS. Colourful Bleach chapters are considered Canon because Kubo did draw them and have them publish as a humorous supplement to his world in Shonen Jump Monthly. Tinni 02:11, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

Just to point out another anime-only character who was also designed by Kubo. Jin Kariya. Minato (Talk)  23:55, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

Unfortantely no one is considered a canon character unless written and drawn by Kubo in the manga to be technical. There is a possability if there is some signifcance to Koga being a part of the family we may see this revelation later down the line in the manga making it canon information. Salubri (Talk)  00:23, December 18, 2009 (UTC)


 * i see. if characters are shown in the manga omake, will they be considered canon?--WinterFox 05:38, December 18, 2009 (UTC)