Bleach Wiki talk:Image Gallery

Picture Change Guidelines
As per the Image Policy, nominate and discuss changes to the profile pictures of the character articles here and only here. The typical requirements for a profile picture are that it shows the character facing forward, in their typical attire and should not be battle-worn. They should be centered, have good lighting, and be of good quality. Candidates also must have valid and complete and  templates attached to them or else they will be rejected.

Votes
How to vote:

{|align=right


 * }


 * Vote by typing either of the following in the relevant sections:

Only one "Support" vote per user. Votes will be open only for a week of the initial pic being placed. At the end of the week the highest rated pic will win. If no pick is a clear winner, than an admin with pick the pic. If another pic is brought up after the picture is picked then the voting begins again with the pic that has already been picked and the new pic or pics.

Nelliel (child form)
It's a picture change for Nel, one of my favorite characters! Shinjutsuke (talk) 13:46, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) As proposer. Shinjutsuke (talk) 13:46, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Actually, the proposal was the original picture we used until we agreed that it wasn't accurate and we replaced it. See, the manga and the TYBW anime give Nel green hair, as Kubo intended. But the anime pic you propose shows her with blue hair instead, which is less accurate. Timjer (talk) 14:41, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) Yeah, I'm content sticking with the manga where she isn't crying as much.--Xilinoc (talk) 17:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) Both proposals are nice, but for now the current version is the most optimal IMO. Xeno Gotenks (talk) 04:46, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Senjumaru Shutara

 * 1) All for it; so much better. Timjer (talk) 21:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) No contest! Xeno Gotenks (talk) 04:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) Absolutely, so glad we finally have a shot of her with detail on the face.--Xilinoc (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) I think the proposal looks better than the current image.Shinjutsuke (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Kirio Hikifune

 * 1) All of the yes. Timjer (talk) 21:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Again no contest! Xeno Gotenks (talk) 04:37, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) But of course!--Xilinoc (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) Shinjutsuke (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Ichibē Hyōsube

 * 1) Proposal 2; at least it does not have his thumb in the way. Timjer (talk) 21:18, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) For now Proposal 2, though hopefully something a bit more straight forward comes along. Xeno Gotenks (talk) 04:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) I'm actually gonna go against the grain here and pick Proposal 1 - while I don't love the thumb (believe me, I wish there were a frame of that shot without his hand raised), I do prefer him looking directly at the camera and not having his B E A R D dominating the shot (Proposal 2 is better suited as his portal pic, imo).--Xilinoc (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 4) Gonna go with Proposal 2 here! Shinjutsuke (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Tenjirō Kirinji

 * 1) Many of these are great, but I must choose Proposal 3 since it has a good angle on his face and I like his facial reaction. Proposal 4 would have been perfect, but the thumb is a bit too obstructive. Xeno Gotenks (talk) 04:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) I have to go with Proposal 3 as well - my goal was to find a shot that showed his ridiculous pompadour in addition to his face at a reasonable angle, and that's what best fits the bill right now.--Xilinoc (talk) 08:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 3) Going with Proposal 3 because of his Pompadour. Shinjutsuke (talk) 17:29, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Jackie Tristan
Greatsage (talk) 19:04, November 29 2022 (UTC)
 * 1) Defintley have to go wth the proposal, character is angled better and unlike the current you can see the character's facial features clearer.
 * 2) Off-model.--Xilinoc (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Isshin Kurosaki

 * 1) Found this one while rewatching the series, its higher quality and you can see the entire face if not we can post to image gallery.Greatsage (talk) 19:17, November 29 2022 (UTC)
 * 2) Very off-model with a weirdly long face.--Xilinoc (talk) 20:09, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

New wiki background and possible logo changes
I was playing around with some of the Burn the Witch assets I found and made some new wiki background concepts. I made a background, a "header banner" and a new logo. Do you guys like any of the new concepts?

-- 16:11, August 24, 2020 (UTC)


 * 1) Been wanting a new header banner for a while now but the editor kept glitching so I never got to fool around with it - your proposal looks great. Same with the new logo and background, as much as I love the final arc and as much as our current logo has grown on me, right now it's BTW time (I'd be open to bringing back this BG when the anime starts airing again, though, then maybe capping it all off with a "dual banner" of Ichigo/Rukia/Noel/Ninny after it's all said and done).--Xilinoc (talk) 16:29, August 24, 2020 (UTC)

Yeah I’m open for a “dual background” and I would have done one, but there isn’t any key art for the anime yet, so I think this will do fine for the moment. -- 16:37, August 24, 2020 (UTC)

Support the wordmark and banner, but not the background. Its time for a change I think, but it should be the characters and it should include proper Bleach characters first and foremost. While its only right that BtW be acknowledged since its the only new content right now, it shouldnt supersede the original which is 95%+ of what the wiki is about. 09:12, August 25, 2020 (UTC)


 * Agree with Yyp. I support the wordmark and banner as well. While I admit the proposed background looks awesome, it kinda detracts from the fact that this wiki is still primarily about Bleach, not its spinoff. Timjer (talk) 09:23, August 25, 2020 (UTC)


 * Fair points, both of you. I'll try making a background to satisfy all parties later, but for now I say move ahead with the logo and background.--Xilinoc (talk) 11:50, August 25, 2020 (UTC)

I can refine the logo a bit (I was doing it on the fly) and move on using the header if all parties agree.-- 20:33, August 25, 2020 (UTC)

I created another logo concept -- 20:08, August 26, 2020 (UTC)

Managed to add the banner pic. Took a surprising amount of cropping, resizing to get it positioned right. Im sure itll surprise nobody that it doesnt show up on the Discussion page... 14:02, October 15, 2020 (UTC)